Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015435
Original file (20100015435.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	  23 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100015435 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Army Good Conduct Medal be added to his 
DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 6 March 1969.

2.  The applicant states his military record was excellent.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a:

* court order changing his and his family's last name
* certificate of achievement
* brief history of his service achievements

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 March 1966 for 3 years.  He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded the military occupational specialty of 11E (Armor Crewman).

3.  The applicant completed a tour with the 1st Reconnaissance Squadron, 
2nd Armored Cavalry in Germany from 1 August 1966 to 13 July 1968.  He was promoted to specialist five/pay grade E-5 on 15 June 1967.

4.  On 6 March 1969, the applicant was released from active duty.  He had completed 3 years of active service that was characterized as honorable.  
Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  There are no orders in the applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal.

6.  There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Records do not show indiscipline or lost time.  His records do not contain any adverse information.  His record shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service.

 7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have been awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant's records do not show indiscipline or lost time, he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service, there is no record of a commander's disqualification, and he was promoted to specialist five in less than 2 years.  Therefore, the preponderance of the evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 7 March 1966 to 6 March 1969.   

BOARD VOTE:

___x___  ___x_____  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period of service from 7 March 1966 to 6 March 1969
* amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award)




      _______ _  x _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015435



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015435



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003326

    Original file (20130003326.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940. The applicant's records do not show any indiscipline or lost time, he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his period of military service, and there is no record of a commander's disqualification. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010465

    Original file (20100010465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, his item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows his duty military occupational specialty (MOS) was 11B (Rifleman) from 1 May 1969 through 7 January 1970. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Army Commendation Medal....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009072

    Original file (20140009072.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar * Bronze Star Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge 7. The applicant's records do not show indiscipline or lost time, he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his military service, and he was promoted to sergeant in less than 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015644

    Original file (20100015644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of 3 years from 5 January 1966 through 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003804

    Original file (20090003804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Orders in the applicant's military records show he was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds received on 3 February 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016023

    Original file (20110016023.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. He provided and his service record contains evidence which shows he served in Vietnam. Based on the evidence of record, item 30 of his DD Form 214 should be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011979

    Original file (20110011979.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded him the Air Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007899

    Original file (20110007899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in the RVN. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this badge. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21 April 1966 to 20 April 1969, b. adding the following awards to item 24 of his DD Form 214: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * four bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002831

    Original file (20090002831.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal for his period of service from 12 July 1966 to 29 June 1969; and b. adding to item 24 of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006764

    Original file (20080006764.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show that his DD Form 214 does not show all of the awards and decorations the applicant was awarded or was entitled to based on his service in Vietnam. The applicant's records show that he was wounded twice. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 2 July 1968 to 17 December 1969; b. awarding the Purple Heart (First...