Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015286
Original file (20100015286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100015286 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his second Silver Star be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states he earned both so they both should be shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214; an award certificate for the Silver Star, dated 19 January 2001; the narrative of a Congressman when he presented the Silver Star with Oak Leaf Cluster to the applicant on 31 August 2001; General Orders Number 154, dated 15 June 1951, which awarded the applicant the Silver Star for his actions on 14 and 15 February 1951; a list of his awards, decorations, and badges; a certificate of achievement, dated 31 July 1968; and Korean War Branch Bulletin Winter 1995.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he entered active duty on 4 December 1940 and was honorably released from active duty on 7 July 1945.  He reentered active duty on 27 August 1948, served continuously without any further breaks in service, was promoted to the rank of command sergeant major, and was retired for years of service on 31 July 1968.

3.  General Orders Number 154, dated 15 June 1951, awarded the applicant the Silver Star for his actions on 14 and 15 February 1951.  The narrative in those orders say, in part, that while "in command of a section of tanks which was covering a road which ran into the regimental perimeter…a large enemy force overran the friendly forces positions, causing them to withdraw in disorder.  With complete disregard for his personal safety, [applicant] left his position of comparative safety, and under a hail of enemy small arms and mortar fire reorganized the confused men into a new defensive position, halting the enemy's advance."

4.  On 22 October 1963, the applicant submitted a letter requesting the Silver Star medal set to accompany General Orders Number 154 and asked if there was any record of him being recommended for the Silver Star for action on the Chung-Chong river line in North Korea on 27 November 1950.

5.  The applicant submitted an award certificate for the Silver Star, dated 19 January 2001, and the narrative of a Congressman who presented the medal to the applicant.  The Congressman, apparently reading from the narrative from the applicant's Silver Star orders, said the decoration was awarded for the applicant halting an attack on 25 November 1950 which resulted in 14 enemy killed and 87 enemy captured.  However, the applicant did not submit orders for this Silver Star and no orders are contained in his military records.

6.  In the processing of this case the Board's staff contacted the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Awards Branch.  HRC confirmed the Awards Board awarded the applicant the Silver Star in 2001, but it did not retain a copy of the order awarding that decoration to the applicant.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Silver Star is awarded for gallantry in action against the enemy.  The required gallantry (spirited and conspicuous acts of heroism and courage) must have been performed with marked distinction.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The Silver Star certificate would normally be insufficient evidence to add a second Silver Star to the applicant's DD Form 214.  Orders are required to add decorations to a DD Form 214.  However, HRC confirmed the Awards Board awarded the applicant the Silver Star in 2001.

2.  It is obvious that the two Silver Stars are for distinctly separate acts on different dates.

3.  In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate to add the applicant's second Silver Star to his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 July 1968.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by 
amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 July 1968 to read "Silver Star with First Oak Leaf Cluster."



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015286



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015286



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002181

    Original file (20130002181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At first, the enemy could not see them. Like he said, he never saw the enemy. For awards of the Silver Star and below, the Army Decorations Board may disapprove the award recommendation or recommend forwarding the action to the Senior Decorations Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016523

    Original file (20080016523.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Furthermore, there are no General Orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Silver Star. The applicant submitted a copy a certificate, dated 9 November 1968, that shows he was awarded the Silver Star for gallantry in action on 3 April 1968 in the Republic of Vietnam. As [Applicant] reached the lead elements, he immediately took the fallen mans’ (sic) machine gun and began placing a devastating volume of fire on the enemy machine gun position in order for the men from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009265

    Original file (20100009265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, promotion consideration to a higher rank, and the records of the 7th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Infantry Division awards ceremony that occurred on the 153rd anniversary of the regiment. In the letter, the commander stated the applicant had indicated he received the Bronze Star Medal while stationed in the Republic of Korea on 30 January 1951. In support of his application, the applicant provided the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005448

    Original file (20110005448.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a letter to the applicant, dated 19 October 2010, Chief, Military Awards Branch, HRC, stated on 26 August 2009, the Commanding General, HRC, disapproved forwarding the recommendation to the Senior Army Decorations Board and affirmed that the previously awarded Distinguished Flying Cross was the appropriate award for his action. A letter to LTC B_____, dated 22 February 2011, from the Army Review Board Agency stated that in order to initiate a review of the applicant's military records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000499

    Original file (20090000499.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 24 July 1968 to show his previously awarded Silver Star, Purple Heart, Vietnam Service Medal (with 3 bronze service stars), Meritorious Unit Commendation, and Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; b. correction of his DD Form 214 to show the inclusive dates of his assignment in Vietnam; and c. award of the Army Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609660C070209

    Original file (9609660C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He “then shifted his forces to meet an enemy attack from the east and successfully halted the attack forcing the enemy to withdraw.” An evaluation report rendered for the period in question also commended the former servicemember’s actions on 23 August, noting that he drove a 1/4 ton vehicle through the compound carrying wounded personnel to the aid station while “exposing himself to automatic weapons fire at close range.” Orders awarding the Army Commendation Medal with “V” device were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005117

    Original file (20120005117.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also indicated the Decorations and Awards Board, 8th U.S. Army Korea, recommended award of the Distinguished Service Cross. The Distinguished Service Cross is awarded to a person who, while serving in any capacity with the Army, distinguished himself or herself by extraordinary heroism while engaged in action against an enemy of the United States not justifying award of the Medal of Honor. The highest awards for valor are, in descending order, the Medal of Honor, the Distinguished...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011686

    Original file (20080011686.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, an authorized agent working on behalf of the former service member (FSM), requests that the FSM's Air Medal with "V" Device be upgraded to the Silver Star. The applicant provides, through the office of a Member of Congress, an undated facsimile (fax) transmission sheet which was used to forward the application to this agency; a letter from the Member of Congress addressed to this agency, dated 21 July 2008, providing details regarding the FSM's brave service to this country;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011939C071029

    Original file (20060011939C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011939 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Lieutenant Colonel (then Lieutenant) S___ had recommended the applicant for award of the Silver Star. The applicant provided a 12 July 2006 letter from a former platoon member who also stated that during a fierce...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001708

    Original file (20140001708.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 9 September 1968 to show all his medals and awards to include the: * Silver Star * Soldier's Medal 2. The evidence of record shows that he was awarded the Soldier's Medal for an act of heroism that occurred on 31 October 1968 and this award is reflected on his DD Form 214, ending 9 September 1968. He provides a memorandum, dated 14 July 1970, which...