Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015262
Original file (20100015262.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100015262 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his branch or class shown on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  He states the following:

* he did not join the National Guard
* he applied for health benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs
* the Department of Veterans Affairs told him that he was not eligible for benefits because he had joined the National Guard
* he joined the Army for 2 years and received an honorable discharge due to family issues

3.  He provides a copy of his DD Form 214 in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  His DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 April 1969 for a period of 2 years.

3.  He was honorably released from active duty on 14 May 1969 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), chapter 6, by reason of hardship and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Standby) on the following day.

4.  Item 4 (Department, Component and Branch or Class) of his DD Form 214 shows the entries "Army," "RA" [Regular Army], and "UNASG" [unassigned].

5.  Letter orders published on 11 June 1969 discharged him from the U.S. Army Reserve effective 11 June 1969.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  The version in effect at the time directed to enter "ARMY" in capital letters and the component and branch in which serving immediately prior to separation in item 4.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 11 April 1969 through 14 May 1969.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Standby) after he was separated from active duty.

2.  Due to the fact that he did not complete initial entry training, he was not awarded a military occupational specialty or assigned to a specific branch.  Therefore, item 4 of his DD Form 214 properly shows his branch as unassigned.

3.  His service record does not include any evidence which shows he served in the National Guard.

4.  Based on Army Regulation 635-5, the DD Form 214 is meant to reflect his status as of his last day of active duty on 14 May 1969.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 is correct as currently constituted and there is no basis for granting his request.  The Department of Veterans Affairs may be confusing the term "UNASG" with "ARNG" (Army National Guard).

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015262



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015262



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017273

    Original file (20130017273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. when he was released from active duty under the 1988 Reduction in Force (RIF) Early Transition Program, he transferred directly to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR); b. the USAR transfer demonstrates his desire to remain on active duty and meets the requirement of an "extended enlistment," thereby warranting award of 730 active duty points for the period from 2 May 1988 through 1 May 1990; c. on 4 January 2008, he transferred from the USAR Individual Ready Reserve (IRR)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004875

    Original file (20140004875.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests retroactive unit vacancy promotion to captain (CPT) in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) with back pay and allowances as well as retirement point credit. The applicant provides: * 2009 USAR Appointment memorandum * ARNG Retirement Points History Statement * Email exchange * BSN-STRAP Contract * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 62E (Application for Federal Recognition as an ARNG Officer or Warrant Officer and Appointment as a Reserve Commissioned Officer or Warrant Officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017995

    Original file (20090017995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his military records be corrected to show his rank as sergeant. The applicant's Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 12 September 1971, shows he was discharged from the USAR in the rank of specialist four. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provided none which shows he was promoted to sergeant prior to his discharge from the Army National Guard or the USAR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017947C070206

    Original file (20050017947C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant served a period of qualifying service for award of the National Defense Service Medal and the ROK-KWSM. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the United Nations Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the ROK-KWSM,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001122C070205

    Original file (20060001122C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NGB Form 22, National Guard Bureau Report of Separation and Record of Service, he was provided on his discharge shows his rank, pay grade, and date of rank to be: SP4/E-4/6 March 1969, the same rank, pay grade, and date of rank shown on his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 15 December 1969. These orders show the applicant was discharged in the rank/pay grade, Specialist Four/E-4. These items show the applicant's rank and pay grade on the date of his release from active duty was SP4, E4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005787

    Original file (20120005787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 10 April 1974, Office of the Adjutant General, USAR Components Personnel and Administration Center, St. Louis, MO, published Letter Orders Number 040378 transferring him...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00529-02

    Original file (00529-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he resigned and was discharged from the Naval Reserve on 20 November 1994. b. We recommend approval of his request for resignation from the Naval Reserve, with an effective discharge date of 20 November 1994 November 1994, be expunged from his Naval records, including any failures of selection, transfers, and accumulation of years of commissioned service. Because - oneously affiliated in the Selected Reserve November 1994 not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014306

    Original file (20080014306.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Since the applicant served in the Army National Guard after his release from active duty, there is no basis for amending his DD Form 214 to show this service.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130015684

    Original file (AR20130015684.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall length and quality of the applicant's service and the circumstances surrounding the discharge (i.e., the applicant was branched aviation from ROTC, he was scheduled for BOLC classes, on 9 March 2008 and 25 April 2008; however, those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009899

    Original file (20080009899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, he requests that the orders reassigning him to the Standby Reserve (Inactive) be revoked or a waiver granted so he could appear before the FY 2008 Army Reserve Judge Advocate General's Promotion Selection Board. Additional instructions included in those orders stated, "You will be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible) one (1) year from the effective date of this order unless you provide the MSO election requesting to remain in the IRR." The evidence of...