Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014992
Original file (20100014992.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  6 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014992 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM) and all other awards he may be entitled to receive.

2.  He states he flew in air support missions in the Republic of Vietnam from 
12 November 1969 to 6 June 1970 and logged in over fifty hours of flight time.  He maintains he was recommended for the award on 12 June 1970, but the recommendation was not followed up on due to his separation.

3.  He provides the following:

* DD Form 214
* Recommendation for the AM
* Numerous documents containing flight hours
* USARV Forms 131 (Awards and Decoration Qualification Record)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of 


justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 December 1968.  He completed the required training and he was awarded Military Occupational Specialty 81B (Technical Drafting Specialist).  He was honorably released from active duty on 18 September 1970. 

3.  His DA Form 20 shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 
23 September 1969 to 18 September 1970.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 34th General Support Group (GSG).  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) shows he was awarded the Basic AM by Headquarters, 34th GSG and the Army Commendation Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster) (1OLC) by General Order Number 53, Headquarters, 34th GSG.  The entry "No" is listed under the issued block in both the AM and the ARCOM (1OLC) lines indicating that the medal was not issued.  

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Army Commendation Medal, and the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  His military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the AM or the ARCOM (1OLC). 

6.  The Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), a web based index containing U.S. Army general orders issued between 1965 and 1973 for the Vietnam era, does not contain orders awarding him the AM or the ARCOM (1OLC). 

7.  He provided a partially illegible document that appears to show he was recommended and approved for the "Basic" AM for the period November 1969 to June 1970.  He also provided numerous documents that appear to show flight 

hours of several officers and warrant officers.  Additionally, his USARV Forms 131 show the date, hour, and missions performed.  Although several of the entries on these forms are illegible, it clearly shows the applicant accumulated over 50 hours of flight time.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the AM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

9.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows while the applicant was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 34th GSG the unit was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 51, dated 1971.  The same pamphlet provides for the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all units that served in Vietnam between 20 July 1965 and 28 March 1973 which were subordinate to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam by DAGO Number 8, dated 1974.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  This same regulation states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.  It shows he participated in four campaigns during his tour in Vietnam: 

* Vietnam Summer - Fall 1969, 9 June - 31 October 1969
* Vietnam Winter - Spring 1970, 1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970
* Sanctuary Counteroffensive, 1 May - 30 June 1970
* Vietnamese Counteroffensive Phase VII, 1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's military personnel record and the web-based ADCARS do not contain orders awarding him the AM.  However, his DA Form 20 indicates he was 

awarded this award.  Additionally, USARV Forms 131 and the recommendation for the award of the AM substantiate his entitlement to this award.  Therefore, in the interest of equity and justice, it would be appropriate to show he was awarded the AM and to have this award added to his DD Form 214.

2.  The applicant's DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the ARCOM (1OLC) by General Order Number 53.  Therefore, he is entitled to have this award added to his DD Form 214.

3.  Evidence of record shows he is entitled to wear the Meritorious Unit Commendation and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards.

4.  Evidence also shows he participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

   a.  deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the ARCOM and the Vietnam Service Medal; and

   b.  adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the AM, ARCOM (1OLC), Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars, the Meritorious Unit 

Commendation, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014992





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014992



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003084536C070212

    Original file (2003084536C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was awarded the Air Medal (AM) with 13 oak leaf clusters (OLC) during his first tour in Vietnam (28 August 1966 to 1 July 1967); however, he never received any additional awards of the AM during his second tour in Vietnam (May 1969 to May 1970). He had served 20 years, 1 month and 23 days of total active service and was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the AM with 13 OLC, the Aircraft Crewman Badge, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002617

    Original file (20110002617.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by: a. deleting the current VSM and ARCOM entries and b. adding the Vietnam Service Medal with 4 bronze service stars, Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013714

    Original file (20140013714 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show 15 additional awards of the AM (i.e., the AM with Numeral 16) because he accrued 763 hours of combat assault or combat support flight time. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded more than one AM. e. However, based on the evidence of record (i.e., certification by the operations officer that the applicant accrued 453 flight hours) and the conclusion they were category III...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016109

    Original file (20080016109.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the applicant has provided three BSM Certificates, orders for only two of those awards are in the applicant's records. The applicant's contention that his award of the Air Medal with 12 OLCs should be added to his records has been noted; however, he has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the available evidence of record that he was awarded 13 awards of the Air Medal or that he was entitled to 13 awards of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000701

    Original file (20080000701.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MPRJ is void of any orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for, or awarded the AM, and of any flight records documenting his flight hours and types of flight missions performed in the RVN. It is also void of any flight records documenting the amount of hours and category of missions the applicant completed in the performance of his aerial flight duties while serving in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013278

    Original file (20100013278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized to wear the: * National Defense Service Medal * ARCOM * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * AM * Vietnam Campaign Medal [properly known as the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)] * BSM 10. As a result, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active service from 22 January...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021193

    Original file (20090021193.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains (and he also provides copies of) three separate general orders showing he was awarded the Purple Heart (First Award) for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 24 August 1969. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014691

    Original file (20070014691.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Third-Party Statement; a USARV Form 131 (Awards and Qualification Record (Air Medal)); Separation Document (DD Form 214); Correction to DD Form 214 (DD Form 215); and Awards Regulation Extracts. The record shows the applicant's record was administratively corrected and a DD Form 215 was issued documenting these corrections on 30 March 1997. The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was ever recommended...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008532

    Original file (20060008532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following members, a quorum, were present: The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to show his entitlement to additional awards of the Air Medal (AM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing his entitlement to the Air Medal 3rd Oak Leaf Cluster (4th Award); b. awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024572

    Original file (20110024572.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records do not contain official orders awarding him the Aircraft Crewmember Badge or any additional awards of the Air Medal. USARV Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the award of the Aircraft Crewmember Badge and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.