Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014937
Original file (20100014937.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    4 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014937 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was promoted to staff sergeant.

2.  The applicant states he was assigned as a personnel noncommissioned officer (NCO) in the rank of technician 4th Grade (T4).  The company commander assured him he would be promoted to staff sergeant prior to discharge in March 1946.  He further contends that personnel NCO's in the European Theater of Operations (ETO) were normally given the rank of staff sergeant, particularly those who were in company redeployments back to the United States.  The applicant was inadvertently overlooked for this promotion in order to expedite the redeployment process.  The applicant does not feel there is an injustice, only an oversight caused by the need to expedite personnel for discharge.  The applicant does not seek entitlements other than the honor of receiving a fourth stripe to the rank of staff sergeant which would make an old Soldier very proud indeed.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge), WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record), and a letter he wrote to his Congressman.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, the documents provided by the applicant are sufficient for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows:

	a.  he entered active duty service on 2 June 1943;

	b.  he served in the ETO from 30 April 1944 to 2 March 1946;
	
	c.  he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 502 (Personnel NCO);

	d.  he was assigned to the 947th Ordnance Motor Vehicle Distribution Company;
	
	e.  he attained the rank of T4; and

	f.  he was honorably discharged on 16 March 1946.

4.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 100 shows he served as a personnel NCO for 18 months in MOS 502; and worked in a company orderly room and performed various clerical duties. 

5.  Army Regulation 615-5, then in effect, provided that enlisted soldiers who were eligible for promotion would be recommended in writing, approved by the appropriate authority, and orders issued confirming the promotion.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his military records should be corrected to show he was promoted to staff sergeant prior to discharge because his company commander had assured him he would be so promoted.  He further argues that it was normal for personnel NCO to be promoted to staff sergeant, especially when they were redeploying to the United States.  

2.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant had served as a personnel NCO for 18 months in the rank of T4.  Unfortunately, there is no available documentary evidence showing that he had been recommended for promotion to staff sergeant prior to discharge.  Without his service records or other supporting documentation, the Board cannot make an appropriate determination in this case. 

3.  This action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in his service to our Nation.  The applicant should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014937





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014937



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018390

    Original file (20120018390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her original request that the WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Records and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show his grade as that of a sergeant (Sgt) or staff sergeant (S/Sgt) instead of Technician Third Class (T/3). His WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record) shows he held the grade of private first class for 7 months and the grade of T/3 for 10 months. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014837

    Original file (20130014837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his WD AGO Form 53-55 shows in item 6 that his organization was Company B, 4th Tank Battalion, 1st Armored Division; however, he never served in that unit. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007834

    Original file (20130007834.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 30 (Military Occupational Specialty and Number) of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show his specialty as 745 (Rifleman) rather than 345 (Light Truck Driver). Item 30 of the WD AGO Form 53-55 in effect at the time showed the Soldier's MOS at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant held and performed in an infantry MOS (745) during his service in WWII as shown on his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007578

    Original file (20100007578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army medical records from 1941 show the date he was wounded in action as 14 October 1943 and not 18 September 1943 as shown on his WD AGO Form 53-55. There are no general orders in the available records that show award of the Silver Star. The applicant contends that her father's WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show the Silver Star, his rank as a S/Sgt, and the date wounded as 14 October 1943.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010281

    Original file (20080010281.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for correction of his records to show his military rank as sergeant (SGT). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011335

    Original file (20120011335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable) to show his grade as Technical Sergeant (T/Sgt) instead of "PFC" (Private First Class). All enlisted and noncommissioned ranks were reduced from 128 different insignias and several pay grades to only seven rank insignias and seven pay grades, which were numbered in seniority from 1st Grade (highest) to 7th Grade (lowest). ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020761

    Original file (20100020761.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) and Honorable Discharge Certificate to show he was a member of 75th Division and that he served all of his combat time with this division not the 29th Division. The applicant provides the following documents: * An email testimony from a former unit member * A self-authored statement * Honorable Discharge Certificate * WD AGO Form 53-55 * WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004750

    Original file (20080004750.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005883

    Original file (20140005883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests on behalf of her father award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correction of her father's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show this medal. The FSM's complete military records are not available for review. Section 21 (Medals, Decorations, and Citations) of his WD AGO Form 24A (Service Record), for the period 6 April 1946 to 13 April 1947, does not show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014150

    Original file (20130014150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) to show he was awarded the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal, Bronze Star Medal (BSM), and Purple Heart. The National Archives WWII Prisoners of War Data File, 7 December 1941 to 19 November 1946, lists the FSM as having been captured in the European Theater on 11 July 1944. As a result, the Board recommends that all...