Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014926
Original file (20100014926.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	

		BOARD DATE:	  23 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014926 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that her uncharacterized discharge be changed to a general discharge under honorable conditions.

2.  The applicant states the following:

	a.  she indicates she had only been 18 years old for 10 days when she left home to begin her military career, scared and excited;

	b.  she provides a summarized history of her initial entry training indicating she loved basic training; however, the great demands of physical training went far above and beyond what should have been considered normal during advanced individual training (AIT);

	c.  during AIT, she suffered verbal abuse and relentless harassment from her drill sergeant who would often pull her out of formation, take her to his office where he would "smoke" her until she became sick for no reason, follow her around and call her names, scream at her, and degrade her at every available opportunity;

	d.  although the drill sergeant knew her mother was fighting breast cancer, he would call her mother a "f___ing whore" and said her mother would die before she got to see her again;

	e.  after returning from a weekend pass, seeing that nothing was going to change although she sought help from others, she departed absent without leave (AWOL) as her only means of any relief;

	f.  upon returning to duty she was told that she would be transferred to resolve the situation with her drill sergeant; and

	g.  after she signed the transfer papers, she felt like she had been tricked because she had been put out of the military and was on a plane going home.

3.  The applicant provides the following:

* self-authored statement
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* two letters of support
* Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States letter

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows that she enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 August 1993.  She completed basic combat training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, and was further assigned to Fort Sam Houston, Texas, to attend AIT in military occupational specialty 91B (Medical Specialist).

3.  The applicant's record shows she never advanced above her entry grade of private/E-1 while serving on active duty.  Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was awarded or authorized the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Army Service Ribbon
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar

4.  On 9 December 1993, the applicant's unit commander informed her of the intent to process her for separation under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations).  The unit commander cited the applicant's record of AWOL and inability to adapt to the Army as the basis for the action.  The applicant acknowledged receipt of the separation notification and her understanding that if approved, she would receive an uncharacterized discharge.

5.  On an unknown date, the separation authority approved the applicant's separation for performance and conduct while in an entry-level status (ELS).  The separation authority directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of chapter 11, Army Regulation 635-200, and that her service be uncharacterized based on her ELS.

6.  On 16 December 1993, the applicant was discharged accordingly.  At the time of her separation she had completed 4 months and 8 days of active military service.

7.  The applicant provides letters of support from her sister and stepfather.  These individuals indicate the applicant's drill sergeant went beyond protocol and was abusive to her as well as other women during AIT.

8.  There is no evidence indicating the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade to her discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

9.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 3-9 contains guidance on ELS separations.  It states that a separation will be described as entry level with uncharacterized service if the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service at the time separation action is initiated.

10.  Chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an ELS.  An uncharacterized service description is normally granted to Soldiers separating under this chapter.  A general discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions and an honorable discharge is rarely ever granted.  An honorable discharge may be given only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests that her uncharacterized discharge be changed to a general discharge.

2.  The evidence of record confirms that separation action was initiated on the applicant while she was in an ELS status prior to completing 180 days of continuous active military service.  The record further shows the applicant's separation processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.

3.  The record also shows the applicant's service was described as uncharacterized as a result of her being separated while in an ELS status.  A Soldier is in an ELS status, or probationary period, for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The issuance of a general discharge to members in an ELS status is not authorized and an honorable discharge may be granted only in cases that are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  Given no such unusual circumstances are present in the applicant's record, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support any change to the characterization of her service as uncharacterized.

4.  Finally, the evidence of record contained no documents showing the applicant ever made any reports of verbal or any other type of abuse towards her or harassment against her by her drill sergeant during her tenure on active duty to corroborate her claim.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x_  ___x_____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014926



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014926



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007315

    Original file (20120007315.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his entry level status (ELS) performance and conduct discharge to show his service was honorable instead of uncharacterized. It states that a separation will be described as entry level with uncharacterized service if the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service at the time separation action is initiated (emphasis added). It states that the SPD code of "JGA" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001411

    Original file (20110001411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his entry level status (ELS) performance and conduct discharge to show his service was honorable instead of uncharacterized. On 10 February 1986, the applicant's unit commander informed him of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, due to ELS performance and conduct. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's separation action was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000037

    Original file (20110000037.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 February 1994, the applicant's unit commander informed him, the applicant, of his intent to process him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11, by reason of entry level status (ELS) performance and conduct. It states that a separation will be described as entry level with uncharacterized service if the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service at the time separation action is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000170

    Original file (20120000170.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her character of service as honorable instead of uncharacterized. She completed 5 months and 9 days of active service and her service was uncharacterized. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9606172C070209

    Original file (9606172C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He again failed the physical training test. A 2 November 1993 counseling form indicates that the applicant failed the diagnostic physical training test on 11 September 1993 and six physical training tests thereafter, and that the counseling official, his company commander, was recommending that the applicant receive an entry level separation. On 2 November 1993 a counseling form completed by a medical service corps officer indicates that the applicant was referred for entry level...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005459

    Original file (20130005459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Paragraph 3-9 provides that an uncharacterized separation will be described as an entry level separation if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry level status, except when: (1) When characterization Under Other Than Honorable Conditions is authorized under, the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case. Her separation action was initiated prior to the completion of 180 days of continuous active duty service; therefore, she was separated in an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064034C070421

    Original file (2001064034C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In regards to the accusation that she threatened DS B___, she believed she had been subjected to unfair and harsh treatment under DS B___’s supervision. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074128C070403

    Original file (2002074128C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. There is no evidence of record showing that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for a change to her discharge within its 15 year statute of limitations. The Board finds no such circumstances present in the applicant’s record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110021234

    Original file (AR20110021234.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that she had many negative experiences with her drill sergeants and 1st sergeants and as a result of this, she was unable to successfully complete her cycle. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110003308

    Original file (AR20110003308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldier’s initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the Soldier from retention in the service under the provisions...