Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014772
Original file (20100014772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  22 March 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014772 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an earlier effective date for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC).

2.  The applicant states his promotion consideration of 8 September 2008 was denied due to being educationally unqualified.  He provided the necessary information but due to processing delays it was not received prior to the suspense date.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his completion of the Command & General Staff Officer Course (CGSOC), Intermediate Level Education-Common Core (ILE-CC), and his DD Forms 214 for the period ending 2 April 1995 and
14 September 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant served on active duty from 30 October 1985 through 1 March 1995 with transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).

2.  He was called to active duty on 15 September 2005 and he served until 14 September 2007 with transfer to a USAR Troop Program Unit as a major.

3.  The applicant completed ILE-CC on 21 August 2008 and CGSOC on 25 August 2008.
4.  The applicant was originally not found eligible for promotion by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 LTC Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) due to not meeting the educational requirements for promotion.

5.  During the processing of this case, on 12 January 2011, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Officer Promotions Special Actions, U.S. Army Human Resources Command.  The advisory official recommended that the applicant's request be denied.  The rationale was that the applicant was reconsidered for promotion to LTC by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 2008 criteria.  He was selected for promotion and given an effective date of 17 December 2009 based on his assignment to an LTC position on that date.  Therefore, he does not have a basis for promotion consideration by a subsequent SSB.

6.  On 19 January 2011, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not respond.

7.  Army Regulation 135-155 prescribes the policies and procedures for promotion of Reserve officers.  The regulation provides that unit officers selected by a mandatory board will be promoted provided they are assigned/attached to a position in the higher grade.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he was notified that his promotion consideration on 8 September 2008 was denied due to being educationally unqualified.  He provided the necessary information but due to processing delays it was not received prior to the suspense date.

2.  The applicant is correct in that he was initially denied promotion due to an erroneous finding that he was not educationally qualified.  However, this was addressed and rectified by his referral to and selection by an SSB.

3.  The applicant was not qualified for promotion to LTC until such time as he was serving in a position commensurate with the higher rank.  As such, he was promoted to LTC on 17 December 2009 upon his assignment to an LTC position.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X__________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014772



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014772



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016555

    Original file (20090016555.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she should be granted an educational waiver because she: * completed almost 50 percent of Command and General Staff Course (CGSOC) and had to start over * was denied attendance of the active duty course after completion of an Operation Iraqi Freedom mission in an LTC billet on active duty (AD) * obtained a Master's of Science Degree in December 2004 * is currently serving in an LTC billet * completed Phase I of the Intermediate Level Education-Common Core Course (ILE-CC)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016774

    Original file (20110016774.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant defers statements to counsel: COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE: Counsel states: a. the applicant was selected as an alternate to attend the Command and General Staff College (CGSC) and Logistics Executive Development Course (LEDC) on 27 January 2003; as a candidate to attend the resident LEDC in November 2003; however on 24 January 2003, he was mobilized in support of Operation Enduring Freedom for one year and unable to attend either course; b. during this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017887

    Original file (20100017887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his promotion file was not considered by the September 2009 Department of the Army (DA) Reserve Components (RC) Selection Board because he did not meet the ILE military educational requirements for promotion consideration to LTC. This message stated the only acceptable document to confirm course completion for military education was the DA Form 1059 and this form was to be filed in the officer's promotion record at least 1 day prior to the convening date of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017353

    Original file (20100017353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Further, it stated the military education requirement is 50-percent completion of the legacy CGSOC or completion of a non-resident ILE-CC with evidence of completion determined by a DA Form 1059. This message stated the only acceptable document to confirm course completion for military education was the DA Form 1059 and this form was to be filed in the officer's promotion record at least 1 day prior to the convening date of the promotion board. His military service records show he had not...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008758

    Original file (20140008758.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ILE constructive credit was never a requirement for him to be educationally qualified. The advisory official states HRC is not the authority to grant credit for military education - this is very misleading because they are the office that marks the file educationally qualified. Officers not educationally qualified will not be selected for promotion.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002949

    Original file (20110002949.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the past, officers granted waivers could be selected but were not promoted until they completed the prescribed military education. Therefore, the applicant is entitled to correction of his records to show he was granted a military education waiver for promotion consideration to LTC. BOARD VOTE: ____X___ ___X____ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006144C071029

    Original file (20070006144C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The G-1 memorandum went on to state that the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components retains authority to grant military education waivers to requesting officers, but waivers must be granted under more restrictive conditions. The G-1 memorandum also stated that, in situations where the officer applying for a military education waiver does not meet the minimum conditions set out in paragraphs 2a through 2d, and the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components deems the case to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009424

    Original file (20130009424.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests reconsideration of the applicant's earlier request for: * removal of the General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) from the applicant's Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by the Department of the Army (DA) Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) under the Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 or 2007 criteria * in the alternative, consideration of the applicant's records under the FY 2006 or FY 2007 Promotion Selection Board (PSB)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010853

    Original file (20130010853.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by reinstating him in the Active Army Reserve and selecting him for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/pay grade O-5. Additionally, he did not meet the MILED requirement to request a MILED waiver as outlined in HQDA, Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1 policy dated 24 May 2010. c. The applicant states he was 50% ILE, MILED completed which is true; however, 50% ILE is not the required course completion to request a MILED waiver. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001928

    Original file (20130001928.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provides the following documents: a. email messages between the applicant and his PMO that show on: * 14 September 2010, the PMO advised the applicant that records did not show the applicant was educationally qualified for the upcoming promotion board and that an officer who is non-educationally qualified for promotion has no chance of being selected for promotion * 22 December 2010, the applicant provided information about his security clearance * 27...