Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014699
Original file (20100014699.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014699 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the narrative reason for separation on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was honorably discharged due to retirement.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, the current policy dictates that service-members such as himself receive no compensation due to being discharged as a result of circumstance that were out of their control whereas service members deemed single parents can receive compensation.  He believes this policy is inequitable in that it provides benefits for service members who knowingly engage in behavior that could affect their military obligations.  The policy does not provide benefits for service members who are faced with circumstances that are beyond their control and who are forced to act upon last resorts when other options are not successful despite support from their local chain of command.

3.  He provides a:

* Request and Application for Compassionate Actions
* DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  His military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army in pay grade E-1 on 1 May 1989 and served continuously on active duty through several reenlistments. 

2.  On 27 March 2007, he requested a compassionate reassignment from Fort Bragg, NC to Fort McPherson or Fort Gillem, GA, based on the health of his mother.  He stated his mother resided with his spouse and the deterioration of his mother's health had greatly increased the level of concern for the well being of his mother as well as his spouse's ability to provide care without him.  

3.  His request was disapproved on 19 April 2007.

4.  On 29 May 2007, he requested a hardship discharge based on the health of his mother.  He stated his request for a compassionate reassignment was disapproved due to the unavailability of slots in the location he requested.

5.  On 1 June 2007, the appropriate authority approved his request for a hardship discharge and directed his service be characterized as honorable.

6.  He was discharged accordingly under the provisions of paragraph 6-3A, Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), due to dependency or hardship on 25 July 2007, in pay grade E-6.  He was credited with 18 years, 2 months, and 25 days of net active service.

7.  On 10 September 2008, the Army Discharge Review Board denied his request for a change in the character and/or reason of his discharge.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 6-3 states Soldiers on active duty may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship.  Separation will be granted when all the following circumstances exist:  (1) Conditions have arisen or have been aggravated to an excessive degree since entry on active duty.  (2) Conditions are not of a temporary nature.  (3)  Every reasonable effort has been made by the Soldier to alleviate the dependency or hardship conditions without success.  (4)  Separation is the only readily available means of eliminating or materially alleviating the dependency or hardship conditions. The Soldier must request, in writing, separation because of dependency or hardship.  

9.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 12-4, states a Soldier who has completed 20, but less than 30 years of active Federal service may be retired at the individuals request.  The Soldier must have completed at least 20 years and all required service obligations by the requested retirement date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions have been considered.  The evidence shows on 29 May 2007 he requested a discharge under the provisions of paragraph 6-3A, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of hardship/dependency of a family member.  His hardship discharge request was approved on 1 June 2007 and he was discharged accordingly.  He was credited with completion of 18 years, 2 months, and 25 days of active service.

2.  Based on his completion of less 20 years of active service, he was not eligible for retirement.  He submitted a request for a hardship discharge and it was approved.  Item 28 of his DD Form 214 corresponds to the reason for discharge and there is no basis on which to change it.   

3.  Without evidence, it appears his administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.  He was properly discharged in accordance with pertinent regulations with due process.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014699



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014699



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003510

    Original file (20140003510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * applications for compassionate reassignment and hardship discharge * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * four character-reference letters * military records from the National Personnel Records Center CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The Soldier must request separation because of dependency or hardship in writing. She submitted a request for a hardship discharge and her request was approved.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004075

    Original file (20090004075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    BOARD DATE: 23 JULY 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004075 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Paragraph 6-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 states that Soldiers of the Active Army and the Reserve Components may be discharged or released because of genuine dependency or hardship. Evidence of record shows the applicant requested a hardship discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004842

    Original file (20090004842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the narrative reason for separation and separation code on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed to reflect that he was discharged for "Hardship." The available records do not reflect when the applicant returned to the Continental United States; however, on 13 February 1991, while at Fort Bragg, the applicant submitted a request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 6-3a, for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006129

    Original file (20090006129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states that he was released from active duty due to the death of his mother which is the criteria for a dependency discharge as opposed to a hardship discharge as defined in the regulation. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014937

    Original file (20130014937.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by adding the entry “Hardship Discharge” to the narrative reason for his separation. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005588

    Original file (20130005588.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of enlisted Soldiers. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 5 September 1997 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-8 by reason of hardship with an SPD code of "MDB." An RE code of 3 is the correct code for Soldiers separated by reason of hardship.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001241

    Original file (20130001241.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record contains a DA Form 3822-R (Report of Mental Status Evaluation), dated 14 November 1986, that shows he was being examined because he was being considered for a misconduct discharge. However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier's overall record. Although an under other than honorable conditions discharge was normally appropriate for Soldier discharged for misconduct, it appears the separation authority considered his overall...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000392

    Original file (20070000392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued on 14 June 2005 be changed to Hardship instead of Secretarial Authority. Evidence of record shows the applicant applied to the ADRB for a narrative reason for separation change to hardship/dependency and he provided substantive evidence to support his request. Since the evidence of record shows that he should have been discharged due to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001060211C070421

    Original file (2001060211C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 February 2001, the applicant submitted a formal personnel action request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 6, paragraph 6-5, due to dependency of a family member. He stated in his request that the applicant’s son required special attention due to an automobile accident, was confined to a wheelchair, and required constant care and supervision. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant requested to be discharged under the provisions of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076779C070215

    Original file (2002076779C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the obligated period of service, the soldier will not apply for voluntary nondisability retirement unless the soldier is (a) eligible for retirement by completion 30 years or more active Federal service and (b) already eligible through prior service for a higher grade at retirement and (c) over 58 years of age. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, and...