Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014063
Original file (20100014063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 February 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100014063 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reinstatement of his expired transportation entitlement through his Member of Congress.

2.  The applicant states he retired in June 2008.  He and his spouse filled out the paperwork to extend his entitlement for transportation allowance subsequent to retirement.  He did not know he would receive a letter in the mail and never received that letter.  He was having trouble this time last year with getting mail from the post office and changed to another post office as a result.

3.  The applicant provides:

* retirement orders
* two undated requests for an extension to the Personnel Property Shipping Office, Fort Hood, TX
* statement regarding his son's enrollment in school
* letter to his Member of Congress

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 October 1986.  He held military occupational specialty 15K (Aircraft Components Repair Supervisor), served through multiple extensions and/or reenlistments, and attained the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7.

2.  On 20 July 2007, Headquarters, III Corps and Fort Hood, Fort Hood, TX, published Orders 201-0128 announcing the applicant's retirement effective 30 June 2008.  The orders further notified the applicant he was authorized up to 1 year to complete selection of a home and complete travel in connection with this action and that he should contact the Joint Personnel Property Shipping Office for making household goods (HHG) shipment arrangements.

3.  He was honorably retired on 30 June 2008 and was placed on the Retired List in the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 on 1 July 2008.  He was credited with 21 years, 8 months, and 16 days of honorable service.

4.  He submitted:

	a.  an undated request to the Personnel Property Shipping Office, Fort Hood, TX, wherein he requested a 1-year extension of his transportation entitlement.  He contended he was employed by a computer science corporation and his children were enrolled in school.  He did not want to disrupt the children's school attendance;

	b.  a second undated request to the Personnel Property Shipping Office, Fort Hood, TX, wherein he requested an additional 1-year extension of his transportation entitlement.  He contended that his children were enrolled in school and he did not want to disrupt the children's school attendance; and

	c.  statements, dated 24 and 25 March 2010, from his children's schools confirming their attendance.

5.  An advisory opinion from the Chief, Transportation Policy Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-4, Headquarters, Department of the Army, was obtained on 6 January 2011 in the processing of this case.  An official recommended denial of the applicant's request for extension.  He stated that under the provisions of the Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), the time limitation for transportation and travel entitlements under retirement orders is 1 year from the effective date of retirement.  An extension is authorized when the Soldier is unable to move to the home of selection within the 1-year time limit.  The Soldier must request an extension prior to the expiration of the 1-year time limit.  The applicant retired on 30 June 2008.  His first request was required prior to 30 June 2009 and every year thereafter, if necessary, for a maximum of 5 years.  The transportation office does not have a record of receiving any requests for extension prior to his inquiry on 15 March 2010.

6.  He was provided with a copy of this advisory opinion, but he failed to respond.

7.  Volume 1 (Uniformed Service Personnel) of the JFTR contains basic statutory regulations concerning official travel and transportation of members of the uniformed services.  Paragraphs U5130, U5230, and U5365-F contain the policy and procedures pertaining to the shipment of HHG to a permanent duty station (PDS) by uniformed service personnel upon retirement.  In effect, these paragraphs authorize a member travel and transportation allowances to a PDS selected by the member from his last PDS upon retirement.  They state that a member on active duty is entitled to travel and transportation allowances to a home selected by the member from the last PDS upon retirement.  They also establish time limitations for shipment of HHG and state that travel must be completed within 1 year from the active service termination date.

8.  Extension provisions to the 1-year time limit are also provided for deserving cases under the Secretarial process.  This process allows for extensions based on an unexpected event beyond the member's control that prevents movement to a PDS within the specified time limit.  An extension of the time limit may be authorized by the Secretarial process if it is in the best interest of the service or substantially to the member's benefit and not costly or otherwise adverse to the service.  These extensions are approved for the specific period of time that the member anticipates is needed to complete the move, and if additional time is required, the member may request a further extension.  Paragraph U5012-I of Volume 1 of the JFTR provides the policy on restrictions to time limit extensions and states that a written time-limit extension that includes an explanation of the circumstances justifying the extension may be approved for a specific additional time period using the Secretarial process.  However, extensions under this process will not be authorized if it extends travel and transportation allowances for more than 6 years from the separation/retirement date.  These JFTR provisions and time limitations for the shipment of HHG were also in effect at the time of the applicant's retirement.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably retired on 30 June 2008.  His retirement orders stated he was authorized up to 1 year to complete selection of a home and complete travel in connection with this action, and that he should contact the appropriate transportation office for making HHG shipment arrangements.

2.  The JFTR indicates that retirement transportation and travel entitlements will be used within 1 year of retirement; however, it also provides for extensions of this entitlement in 1-year increments up to 5 additional years.  The applicant in this case submitted two requests for extension.  Although there is no indication these requests were received by the servicing transportation office, it appears the applicant made an effort to request the extension.

3.  It is therefore reasonable to presume that had the transportation office received his requests on time, it would have granted him the requested extension.  Therefore, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to correct his record to show he was granted the necessary extension of his earned and authorized retirement travel and transportation entitlement in order to allow his move to a designated retirement location at government expense.

4.  Notwithstanding the G-4's advisory opinion that extension is not authorized, it seems appropriate to approve the applicant's request for extension and reinstatement of his HHG shipment entitlements through 30 June 2011 (3 years after his retirement).  This would, in effect, authorize the applicant to use the approved extension to complete his final move.  Additional extensions beyond this date must be fully justified and requested in writing to the Fort Hood, TX, Transportation Office within the prescribed time limits.

BOARD VOTE:

__X_____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant timely requested and received approval for annual extensions of his retirement transportation entitlements through 30 June 2011.



      ___________X___________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014063



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100014063



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013683

    Original file (20080013683.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Director further recommends the Board direct the DFAS documentation for excess weight for the transportation of HHG for the applicant under the applicable Bill of Lading include the authorized weight allowance of her husband. The evidence of record further shows that the applicant’s husband submitted two requests for extension of his HHG shipment entitlements, by reason of his spouse’s (the applicant) assignment at Fort Hood. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009923

    Original file (20090009923.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    These JFTR provisions and time limitations for the shipment of HHG were also in effect at the time of the applicant’s retirement. The evidence of record shows the applicant was honorably retired on 1 April 2006. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant timely requested and received approval for annual extensions of his retirement transportation entitlements through 31 March 2010.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006408

    Original file (20110006408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    They state that a member on active duty is entitled to travel and transportation allowances to a home selected by the member from the last PDS upon retirement. Evidence of record shows the applicant retired on 29 February 2004. There is no evidence and he did not provide any to show that even if he had submitted his request for an extension of his travel entitlement in a timely manner, he would have been granted that extension given the fact that he had already been granted five...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017718

    Original file (20080017718.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he requested an extension of entitlement to ship his household goods. It appears the applicant submitted a request for an extension of his travel and shipping entitlement in September 2008, 2 years subsequent to his retirement date. Although the applicant failed to timely file a request for extension of his travel and transportation entitlements, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of justice to correct his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003397

    Original file (20120003397.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * retirement orders, dated 11 December 2007 * recall to active duty orders, dated 15 May 2008 * request for extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements * letter from U.S. Army Installation Management Command, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, Redstone Arsenal, AL, dated 21 January 2009 * a letter from the Transportation Office, Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison-Redstone, dated 3 January 2012 * request for further extension of final HHG and NTS entitlements *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008114

    Original file (20090008114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    They also establish time limitations for shipment of HHG and state that travel must be completed within 1 year from the active service termination date. Notwithstanding HQDA G-4's disapproval of his extension request, based on the applicant's unforeseen medical conditions, it would be appropriate to approve the applicant's requests for extension and reinstatement of his HHG shipment entitlements as an exception to policy through 28 February 2011. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000037

    Original file (20150000037.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he timely requested an extension of his entitlement to ship his household goods (HHG) to his home of selection (HOS). The JFTR, paragraph U5365, states a member is required to contact a Transportation Office for an extension prior to the 1st anniversary date of his or her retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he timely requested and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007095

    Original file (20120007095.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she timely requested an extension of her entitlement to ship her household goods (HHG) to her home of selection (HOS). Travel and transportation entitlements expire 6 years from the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing she timely requested extension of her travel and transportation entitlements on 30 April 2010 that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017414C071029

    Original file (20060017414C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 30 June 2006, the applicant requested a reinstatement and extension of his retirement transportation entitlement and shipment of his household goods (HHG) through 31 December 2006. He stated the reason for the extension request was that his family had not yet made a selection of new home and had not yet used their last move transportation entitlement authorized by his retirement. These extensions are approved for the specific period of time that the member anticipates is needed to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006341

    Original file (20120006341.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he retired from the U.S. Army on 1 April 2008 * in the summer of 2011, he conducted a permanent change of station (PCS) move mandated by the Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Act as a Department of the Army Civilian (DAC) employee from Fort McPherson, GA to Williamsburg, VA * an official in the Fort McPherson, GA, Transportation Office recommended that he use his personally procured move (PPM) (formerly known as a do-it-yourself (DITY) move) entitlement from his...