IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 16 November 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013746
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he:
* was 20-years old, the eldest of 12 children, his mother was ill and after she had surgery she couldnt work
* had to be home to assist her with his siblings, two of whom had gotten into trouble
* is 55 years old now and a youth pastor and realizes he made a bad decision
* told his commanding officer at that time why he was absent without leave (AWOL) and about the situation, but got no recourse from that
3. The applicant did not provide any additional documentary evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of
justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 February 1972 for a period of 3 years. Records show he completed basic combat and advanced individual training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 76V (Equipment Storage Specialist). The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was private (PV2)/E-2.
3. Records show that the applicant was punished under the provisions of
Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ):
* on 5 April 1972 for AWOL from his unit from 2 April 1972 until 3 April 1972
* on 17 July 1972 for failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty on 10 July 1972 and 11 July 1972
4. On 24 January 1973, he was convicted by a summary court-martial for being AWOL from 13 October 1972 to 8 December 1972 and from 21 December 1972 to 26 December 1972.
5. On 11 July 1973, charges were preferred against the applicant for being AWOL from his unit from 7 March 1973 until 6 July 1973.
6. On 12 July 1973, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the UCMJ, the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him. Subsequent to receiving this legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial.
7. In his request for discharge, he indicated he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him, or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge. He further acknowledged he understood that if his
discharge request was approved, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration, and that he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State law.
8. On 13 August 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge and directed issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 20 August 1973, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) he was issued for this period of service confirms he completed 9 months and 26 days of total active service with 236 days of time lost.
9. There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred,. Commanders would ensure that an individual was not coerced into submitting a request for discharge for the good of the service. Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of Veterans Administration benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge. An Undesirable Discharge Certificate would normally be furnished an individual who was discharged for the good of the Service.
11. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards to acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
12. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of
under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request that his discharge should be upgraded was carefully considered and it was determined that there is insufficient evidence to support his request.
2. The applicant's record shows he was charged with the commission of offenses punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge. Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. All requirements of law and regulation were met, and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Further, the applicants discharge accurately reflects the overall record of service.
3. The applicant's record of service shows he received punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ on two occasions and he was punished by a summary court-martial on another occasion.
4. Based on the record of indiscipline, the applicants service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. This misconduct also renders his service unsatisfactory. Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to either a general or honorable discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__X_____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case
are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ X _______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013746
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013746
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003608
In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that if his request for discharge is accepted, he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and furnished an undesirable Discharge Certificate. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his discharge shows that he was discharged for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge, with service characterized as under conditions other than honorable. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008717
Following consultation with legal counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10. In his request for discharge he indicated the following: a. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000408
Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial in accordance with chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). In his request for discharge, the applicant acknowledged he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000775
There is no evidence indicating he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge. Chapter 10, in effect at the time, provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred. Based on this record of indiscipline and in view of the fact he voluntarily requested discharge to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003374
Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 1 November 1973. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an undesirable discharge was considered appropriate at the time. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017942
Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separation - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood by requesting discharge he understood if the discharge request was approved, he may be discharged under conditions other than honorable and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 18...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011564
On 26 June 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial consistent with the applicant's chain of command's recommendations and directed his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, if applicable, and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, an undesirable discharge is normally considered...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013066
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to an honorable or a general discharge 2. In his request for discharge, the applicant acknowledged he understood that by requesting discharge he understood that if the discharge request was approved, he may be discharged under other than honorable conditions and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100415C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 24 March 1973, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be issued an undesirable discharge. The applicant’s record of service included a bar to reenlistment, five nonjudicial punishments, two special court-martial convictions and 239 days of lost time.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000404
He served in Vietnam from 21 November 1971 to on or about 24 June 1972. On 13 August 1973, consistent with the chain of command recommendations, the separation authority approved the applicant's voluntary request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial and directed his reduction to the lowest enlisted grade, if applicable, and issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. He was discharged accordingly on 21 August 1973.