Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013559
Original file (20100013559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013559 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  She states she never received her Army Good Conduct Medal.  She always thought that once you completed a 3-year tour of duty you automatically received an Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  She provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  She enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 August 1977 and successfully completed basic and advanced individual training.  She was awarded military occupational specialty 91B (Medical Specialist).

3.  On 28 July 1980, she was honorably released from active duty in the rank of specialist four/E-4 after completing 2 years, 11 months, and 27 days of creditable active service with no time lost.

4.  Her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows she was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).

5.  There is no evidence she received the Army Good Conduct Medal.  There also is no evidence she was disqualified by her chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal.  Her records do not contain any adverse information.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant was separated in the rank of specialist four with 2 years, 11 months, and 27 days of creditable active service with no time lost.  Her records contain no derogatory information.  Therefore, it appears she met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 2 August 1977 through 28 July 1980 based on completion of a period of qualifying service.

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ___X____  ____X___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding her the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 2 August 1977 through 28 July 1980 and by providing her with a correction to her DD Form 214.



      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013559



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013559



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029313

    Original file (20100029313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests all of her medals be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013122

    Original file (20090013122.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her service in Korea and the Korea Defense Service Medal. While the evidence does confirm the applicant served in Korea, there were no provisions for entering the location of the foreign service on an individual’s DD Form 214 at the time the applicant was released from active duty on 31 March 1980. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021737

    Original file (20120021737.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show her awards and service in Germany. The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows: * 11 months and 11 days of overseas service in Korea * no authorized awards or decorations * no full time military education courses completed 4. The record does not indicate that a DD Form 215 was issued.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008183

    Original file (20090008183.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show that she was awarded the Korea Defense Service Medal. Records clearly show that the applicant served a qualifying period of service in the Republic of Korea for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal. Records show that the applicant served on continuous active duty for a period of 6 1/2 years from 28 February 1978 to 31 August 1984.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011408

    Original file (20100011408.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. The evidence of record clearly shows the applicant requested a discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial fully knowing she was subject to receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011546

    Original file (20100011546.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Korean Service Medal. The evidence clearly shows the applicant did not serve during a qualifying period for award of the Korean Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Korea Defense Service Medal to item 13 of her DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013595

    Original file (20100013595.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his records be corrected to show he completed airborne and ranger training. If the commander's decision remains the same, the commander will forward his or her statement, the individual's statement, and his or her consideration for permanent filing in the individual's official military personnel file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016105

    Original file (20140016105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states she was barred from reenlistment on 30 November 1982 for weight control. On 30 November 1982, her commander initiated a Bar to Reenlistment Certificate due to her NJP on 26 January 1981 for being AWOL. There is no evidence her varicose veins or possible asthma prevented her from performing the duties of her rank and MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009745

    Original file (20080009745.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that her last DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show she had continuous service from 24 October 1972 through 12 May 1980 and award of the Army Commendation Medal. At the time the applicant reenlisted, on 2 December 1974, a separate DD Form 214 was required to be prepared to reflect the period of service from 24 October 1972 through 1 December 1974. During the period 2 December 1974 through 1 December 1976, the fact...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022889

    Original file (20110022889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections of her military records: * Correct her last name on her DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) * Issue her a DD Form 256A for her active duty service * Award her the Army Good Conduct Medal * Add her certificates of achievement, letters of appreciation and distinguished service to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Add all other awards she is authorized based on her service 2. The applicant...