Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013415
Original file (20100013415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  11 January 2011

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013415 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states that a one-star general officer got off a helicopter and presented him with the Bronze Star Medal for his part in defeating a sapper attack.

3.  The applicant provides copies of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, a letter of appreciation with a supporting endorsement, and two newspaper articles.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted on 5 March 1968, completed training as an artilleryman, and served in Vietnam from January 1969 to February 1970.

3.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) lists his authorized awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle bar, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device "1960," and two Overseas Bars.

4.  He was released from active duty as a sergeant (E-5) on 20 February 1970 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  His DD Form 214 lists the same authorized awards.

5.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command of Vietnam era general orders, failed to reveal any award information pertaining to the applicant.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged n military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

7.  The documents the applicant submitted to support his request show:

* The 19 June 1969 letter of appreciation to the battery commander from the Commander, 3rd Battalion, 82d Artillery specifically commends the applicant and the men in his section for their efficiency and hard work in relocation on short notice 
* The endorsement from the battery commander is addressed specifically to the applicant and expands on the former remarks to include, "you did with the utmost efficiency, supervise your men in the preparation and march order of your howitzer section with the least possible delay"
* the two newspaper articles talk about sapper attacks on U.S. units in the Mekong Delta region; neither the applicant nor his unit is specifically named 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he was presented the Bronze Star Medal.
2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that, as with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

3.  Unfortunately, there is no substantiating evidence to support the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013415





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013415



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023442

    Original file (20110023442.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in his records and he provides none to show he was awarded a second award of the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity during the period 9 April 1968 through 8 April 1970; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005672

    Original file (20080005672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of the applicant having been recommended for the award of the Army Commendation Medal. There is no evidence of record of anyone in the applicant's chain of command having submitted a recommendation that the applicant be awarded the Army Commendation. Statements provided 60 years after the fact are insufficient to show there was an error or injustice at the time.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013073

    Original file (20100013073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the: * Purple Heart * Combat Action Badge * Red bar or red ribbon [properly known as the Meritorious Unit Commendation] with oak leaf cluster * Presidential Unit Citation 2. His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014273

    Original file (20130014273.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests two awards of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Separation or Discharge) to show the two awards and the Bronze Star Medal. c. As for the June 1970 injury, again there is no evidence of an injury or that such injury occurred as a result of hostile action, and there is also no evidence he was treated or that his treatment was made a matter of official record. There is no evidence in the available records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003022

    Original file (20110003022.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the following: * Bronze Star Medal (BSM) * Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) * Combat Engineer Badge [correctly known as the Sapper Tab] * Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Any additional awards and decorations to which he is entitled 2. A review of his personnel service records failed to show evidence and he did not provide...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019065

    Original file (20100019065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was an infantryman serving in MOS 11C, he was assigned to an infantry unit, and he provided a weapons data card that shows he fired HE rounds during an enemy attack on 3 February 1971. Therefore, based on the evidence he provided to the Board, the applicant should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and his discharge document should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009265

    Original file (20100009265.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, promotion consideration to a higher rank, and the records of the 7th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Infantry Division awards ceremony that occurred on the 153rd anniversary of the regiment. In the letter, the commander stated the applicant had indicated he received the Bronze Star Medal while stationed in the Republic of Korea on 30 January 1951. In support of his application, the applicant provided the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009494

    Original file (20080009494.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's record to show he was recommended for or awarded the BSM. There are no orders showing the applicant was recommended for or awarded the BSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the already-awarded CIB to his record: b. awarding the AGCM (First Award) for the qualifying period of service from 18 May 1970 – 23 December 1971 and correcting his record to show this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018715

    Original file (20140018715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year. There is no available evidence showing he is authorized any awards for his period of service in Germany. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001848

    Original file (20150001848 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was injured on his hand and foot * he served in Vietnam for 11 months and 24 days * he and his unit were attacked by the enemy again on 5 May 1968 * he was honorably discharged at his expiration term of service * his injuries are recorded in his military medical records, but they are not on his DD Form 214 * he was released from active duty (REFRAD) 26 days after the last attack 3. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board. As a result, the...