Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013295
Original file (20100013295.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013295 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his 8 January 1957 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his character of service was honorable instead of under honorable conditions. 

2.  The applicant states he believes his DD Form 214 contains a typographical error since he was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate. 

3.  He provides the following:

* 8 January 1957 DD Form 214 
* 8 January 1957 Honorable Discharge Certificate
* 29 January 1963 DD Form 214

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on five separate occasions and was credited with 20 years and 4 months of total active service.  He was honorably retired on 31 March 1969.  

3.  His DD Forms 214 show the following periods of service:

* 28 December 1948 to 29 October 1953, 4 years, 10 months, and 2 days
* 8 January 1954 to 8 January 1957, 3 years and 1 day
* 30 January 1957 to 29 January 1963, 6 years
* 30 January 1963 to 29 January 1966, 3 years
* 30 January 1966 to 31 March 1969, 3 years, 2 months, and 1 day
   
4.  Item 11c (Reason and Authority) of his DD Form 214 from 8 January 1954 to 8 January 1957 shows he was separated due to expiration of term of service (ETS).  Item 13a (Character of Service) of the same form shows his character as "under honorable conditions," with a DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate).  Additionally, his Honorable Discharge Certificate certifies that he reenlisted in the RA on 8 January 1954 and he was honorably discharged on
8 January 1957.

5.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show his conduct and efficiency during the period January 1954 to January 1957.  However, his military personnel records do not contain an administrative discharge packet or any type of derogatory information.

6.  Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 1-13 provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The issuance of an honorable discharge certificate is predicated upon proper military behavior and proficient performance of duty during the member's current enlistment or period of obligated service with due consideration for the member's age, length of service, grade, and general aptitude.  Where a member has served faithfully and performed to the best of his ability and there is no derogatory information in his military record, he should be furnished an honorable discharge certificate.

7.  Table 1-1, Types of Discharge Certificates, of the same regulation shows that a DD Form 256A is an honorable discharge certificate.



DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

It is obvious that an error occurred in the preparation of the applicant's 8 January 1957 DD Form 214.  There is no administrative discharge or any type of derogatory information contained in his military personnel records.  His DD Form 214 shows he was separated because of ETS.  Both his DD Form 214 and his certificate show he was issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate.  Additionally, he was allowed to reenlist in the Army 22 days after the issuance of this form.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this period of service as honorable.

BOARD VOTE:

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 13a of his 8 January 1957 DD Form 214 the character of service of "Under Honorable Conditions" and adding the entry "Honorable."  



      ___________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013295



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013295



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023422

    Original file (20100023422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his honorable service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by: a. adding the entry "HONORABLE" to item 13a; b. adding the entry "DD Form 256A" to item 13b; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002574

    Original file (20150002574.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his rank as specialist four (SP-4). The applicant provides copies of: * Certificate of Service – Armed Forces of the United States * DD Form 214 * DA Form 1270 (Transfer or Release to Reserve Component of the Army) dated 26 October 1956 * Letter Orders, Headquarters, II U.S. Army Corps, dated 31 January 1963 * DD Form 256A, dated 31 January 1963 CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012916

    Original file (20110012916.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 covering the period 18 March 1954 through 6 September 1955. The available records do not contain a DD Form 214 covering the period 7 September 1955 through 25 July 1957. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to the Remarks section of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 July 1963 the following entry: * Inducted on 18 March 1954 * Honorably discharged...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070016096C080407

    Original file (20070016096C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his service was characterized as honorable. The evidence of record confirms the applicant's request for a hardship discharge was approved by proper authority, and that the orders authorizing his discharge provided that he would receive an honorable discharge (DD Form 256A). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063398C070421

    Original file (2001063398C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was issued a DD Form 214, Report of Transfer or Discharge, and was returned to the Wisconsin Army National Guard. The applicant was released from active duty on 10 August 1962 and returned to state control as a member of the Wisconsin Army National Guard. In pertinent part, it directs that a DD Form 214 will be prepared for each member of the Army National Guard released after completion of 90 days or more of active duty for training.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011298

    Original file (20120011298.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Honorable Discharge Certificate to show his service number as "ER xx-xx9-xxx" instead of "ER xx-xx0-xxxx." The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100016576 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011298 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018918

    Original file (20090018918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 January 1951. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record confirms the applicant completed 22 years, 4 months, and 12 day of continuous active military service, and was retired on 31 May 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005419

    Original file (20090005419.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show his service in Korea and Germany. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 215; a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 31 May 1971; and a copy of his DA Form 24 (Service Record) covering the period 9 April 1957 to 8 April 1969 in support of his application. However, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request to show his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007332

    Original file (20080007332.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant’s available service records that shows he was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant’s available service records that shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. b. DD Form 256A, dated 30 June 1963, that shows the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army of the United States and Armed Forces of the United States of America on 30 June 1963. c. National Personnel Records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017307

    Original file (20100017307.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Forms 214 for the periods ending 31 October 1969, 1 June 1966, and 1 June 1963 which show his service number as "RA XX 8XX XXX." The evidence of record shows the applicant's service number as "RA XX 2XX XXX." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the third digit of his service number in item 2 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 October 1969 and replacing...