Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013276
Original file (20100013276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013276


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), item 17a (secondary specialty number and title) and item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), to show 91B2F (Flying Medic) and the Aircraft Crew Member Badge (renamed the Aviation Badge in 2000).

2.  He states, in effect, military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B2F and the Aircraft Crew Member Badge are not shown on his DD Form 214.  He has supporting document proving errors of omission on his DD Form 214.

3.  He provides:

* his crewmember flying status orders
* a DD Form 139 (Pay Adjustment Authorization)
* a DA Form 145 (Army Correspondence Course Enrollment Application)
* his Form W-2 (Wage and Tax Statement)
* an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) course completion certificate and list of graduates
* his crewmember termination of flying duty orders
* a Recognition of Service certificate
* his DD Form 214
* a letter from the National Personnel Records Center
* information on the Aircraft Crewman Badge


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 January 1971.  He completed training and was awarded primary MOS 71G2O (Medical Records Specialist), on 3 August 1971.  He was awarded secondary MOS 91B2O (Medical Specialist), on 13 June 1972.

3.  On 22 December 1972, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, Fort Lewis, WA, issued Special Orders Number 211 awarding him crewmember flying status effective 8 December 1972.  These orders show his MOS as 71G2O.

4.  A DA Form 145, dated 21 March 1973, shows his duty assignments were flying medic in MOS 91B2F from 1 December 1972 to 21 March 1973 and medical specialist in MOS 91B from 29 October 1971 to 24 October 1972.

5.  He completed the EMT course on 29 July 1973 and graduated on 21 August 1973.

6.  On 18 December 1973, Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division, Fort Lewis, WA, issued Special Orders Number 352 terminating his flying duty effective 1 December 1973.  These orders show his MOS as 71G2O.

7.  On 14 February 1974, he was recognized for outstanding service from 1 December 1972 through 15 February 1974 with the MAST 54 Helicopter Ambulance.

8.  He was released from active duty (REFRAD) in pay grade E-4 on 15 February 1974 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement).

9.  Item 17a of his DD Form 214 shows secondary MOS "91B2O Med Sp 72/06/13."  Item 26 of his DD Form 214 lists the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, two Overseas Service Bars, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16).  

10.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), item 38 (Record of Assignments), shows he served in MOS 91B2O from 1 December 1972 to 15 February 1974.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated the DD Form 214 provided a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The regulation stated item 17a would list the Soldier's secondary MOS code number and title and date of award.  There were no provisions for listing more than one secondary MOS code number and title in item17a.

12.  Army Regulation 211-201 (Enlisted Career Management Fields and Military Occupational Specialties), in effect at the time, provides the enlisted MOS classification structure for the U.S. Army.  The major duties for MOS 91B are supervises dispensary or field medical facilities, administers emergency medical treatment to battlefield casualties, assists with inpatient and outpatient care and treatment, and assists with technical and administrative management of medical treatment facilities.  Chapter 5 of this regulation contains a list of special qualification identifiers authorized for use with an MOS that identifies special requirements of certain positions and special qualifications of personnel who are capable of filling such positions.  It states SQI "F" (Flying Status) is used to identify positions which require personnel to perform frequent and repetitive aerial flights.  Individuals awarded this identifier must volunteer for flight duty and complete qualifying physical examination for flight status.

13.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  That regulation provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.  The regulation authorized the commander of any unit with Army aircraft assigned to publish orders allowing qualified members of that command to wear the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.  To be eligible for temporary award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge an individual had to be on flying status as a crew chief in the case of crew chiefs, electronic sensor system operators, and flight 

engineers or as a non-crewmember in the case of observers, medical aidmen, gunners, aircraft maintenance supervisors, or technical inspectors.  The regulation also required individuals to be qualified based on a Class III physical examination, and to hold a principal duty assignment as a crew chief, flight engineer, aircraft maintenance supervisor, observer, gunner, or technical inspector.  These personnel are authorized to wear the badge temporarily until relieved from these duties or they may be authorized permanent wear of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge once they have fulfilled the regulatory requirements for permanent award of the badge.  

14.  The regulation also specified that for permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge, an individual must have performed in one of the duties specified above for not less than 12 months (not necessarily consecutive) or must have been school trained for a principal duty specified above.  Further, an individual who has participated in at least 15 combat missions under probable exposure to enemy fire while serving in the principal duty of crew chief, flight engineer, aircraft maintenance supervisor, observer, gunner, or technical inspector is entitled to permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends item 17a of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to reflect MOS 91B2F.  Although he provided documentation showing he served in MOS 91B2F from 1 December 1972 to 21 March 1973, the evidence of record shows his flying duties were terminated on 1 December 1973, at which time he no longer participated in aerial flight.  Since his flying status was terminated he no longer qualified for SQI "F."  As such, this secondary MOS code number and title and date of award was properly annotated in item 17a of his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of item 17a of his DD Form 214 to show the MOS of 91B2F.

2.  He also contends his DD Form 214 should to be corrected to show award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.  The evidence shows he was awarded flying crewmember status effective 8 December 1972 and that status terminated effective 1 December 1973, after serving a period of 11 month and 24 days.  Regulatory guidance provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.  Medical aidmen, in a flying status, were authorized temporary award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge until relieved from those duties.  In order for them to be authorized permanent wear of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge an individual must have performed in one of the specified duties for not less than 12 months (not necessarily consecutive), or must have been 

school trained for a specified principal duty, or participated in at least 15 combat missions under probable exposure to enemy fire while serving in the principal duty of crew chief, flight engineer, aircraft maintenance supervisor, observer, gunner, or technical inspector.

3.  The evidence of record and the evidence submitted by him do not show the applicant met the criteria for award of the permanent Aircraft Crew Member Badge during the period of his active duty service.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base an award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge in this case and its addition to his DD Form 214.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013276



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013276



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022909

    Original file (20110022909.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110022909 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. He provides a statement from Mr. C, his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), a memorandum regarding his medical clearance for flight duty, and a copy of the Record of Proceedings for the previous consideration of his application. His DA Form 20 shows in: * item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) he was awarded secondary MOS 91B2O (Medical Specialist) on 13 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001373

    Original file (20090001373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant's records do not contain his flight record and/or orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal. The regulation authorized the commander of any unit with Army aircraft assigned to publish orders allowing qualified members of that command to wear the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018394

    Original file (20110018394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Aircraft Crew Member Badge [now known as the Basic Aviation Badge]. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. Although he may have been recommended for award of the Bronze Star Medal by his supervisor, the evidence of record is void of orders showing the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002080

    Original file (20140002080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show award of the Basic Aviation Badge. There is no evidence which shows he met the qualifications for award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008487

    Original file (20120008487.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Reports of Transfer or Discharge) to show the: * Army Commendation Medal * Air Medal * Aircraft Crew Member Badge (now known as the Aviation Badge) 2. The regulation authorized the commander of any unit with Army aircraft assigned to publish orders allowing qualified members of that command to wear the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. In the absence of orders or other independent evidence that would confirm...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004714

    Original file (20120004714.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Aircraft Crewmember Badge (now known as the Basic Aviation Badge) and/or the Air Medal. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity or the recollection of a former crew chief of events that occurred over 40 years ago, there is no evidence that shows he served on flight status while holding the principal duty assignment of gunner for the required 12 months during his service in Vietnam, or that he was medically qualified based on a Class III physical. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003532

    Original file (20090003532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant previously applied to this Board to be awarded the Aircraft Crewmember Badge and his request was denied because there was no evidence in the available records to show he had participated in at least 15 combat missions. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided for temporary and permanent award of the Aircraft Crew Member Badge. The applicant has provided sufficient evidence in the form of flight records to show that he participated as a crewmember (door gunner)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017862

    Original file (20080017862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he is submitting documentation from his flight records that establishes his eligibility for the Air Medal and Aircraft Crew Member Badge. The applicant’s military personnel records are absent orders or any other evidence that he was awarded the Air Medal or Aircraft Crew Member Badge. Thus, records fail to show the applicant was school trained for an authorized principal duty or that he performed one of the specified duties for a period of not less than 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002134

    Original file (20120002134.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DA Form 759 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate - Army) * DA Form 759-1 (Individual Flight Record and Flight Certificate - Army) * Special Orders (SO) Number 309 (flying status) * Record of Flying Time * Breakdown of awards of what appear to be the Air Medal CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. During his service in Vietnam, he completed various combat missions. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020264

    Original file (20120020264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing, his DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in action, and his medical records do not reflect a combat injury/wound or treatment. His record is also void of any official Army correspondence or Western Union telegrams and there is no conclusive evidence in his service personnel record that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. c. Notwithstanding his sincerity,...