Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013129
Original file (20100013129.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    7 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013129 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be changed to reflect 2 years of active service.

2.  The applicant states he was released from active duty service with less than 5 months remaining on his 2-year service obligation as a result of a war-related injury.  He further states that he does not dispute the dates shown on his DD Form 214; however, he was told that the State of Ohio would not honor his full military service credit for the Ohio Public Employees Retirement System unless his DD Form 214 reflects the full 2 years of military service.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 May 1968 to serve a 2-year active duty requirement.  He completed initial entry training, was awarded the military occupational specialty of medical corpsman, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.

3.  His DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released from active duty on 9 December 1969 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation.  He completed 1 year, 7 months, and 4 days of creditable active service.

4.  The DD Form 214 he received shows his reason and authority for separation as section VII, chapter 5 and chapter 6, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), with a separation program number (SPN) of 411.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states a DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty service.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5, in effect at the time, provided the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPN codes to be entered on the DD Form 214.  It stated that the SPN code of 411 was the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of early separation of overseas returnees.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the applicant correctly indicates the dates shown on his DD Form 214 are correct as constituted, he requests that this form reflect that he completed 2 years of active duty service in order to receive more State retirement credit.  While the government chose to release him early from active duty to preclude a nonproductive reassignment, since there is no error in the dates of service, there is no basis for correcting his DD Form 214 to show he served 2 full years of active duty.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X__ __  __X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X__   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013129



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013129



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080131C070215

    Original file (2002080131C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations-Separation Documents), change 7, dated 18 October 1966, in effect at the time, provided that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002367

    Original file (20140002367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 11c (Reason and Authority), item 17c (Date of Entry), and item 20 (Place of Entry into Current Active Service) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 19 September 1973. His DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 September 1970 shows in: * item 17c – he entered active duty on 5 January 1970 * item 20 – he entered his current active service in Abilene, Texas * item 22a(1) (Net Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013094

    Original file (20130013094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. The applicant was assigned to a unit that was cited for award of the Republic of Korea Presidential Unit Citation; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award. The applicant served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal; therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020255

    Original file (20120020255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests block 13b "Type of Certificate Issued" on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be changed from "None" to "Medically Retired." He states his DD Form 214 shows that there was no certificate issued. There is no evidence in his available record and he has provided no evidence to show he was physically unfit to perform his duties at the time of separation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007175

    Original file (20130007175.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was assigned an SPN of “211” which is a separation code for “Unsanitary Habits.” However, his separation orders indicate that his SPN was “411” which is the separation code for overseas returnees. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009648

    Original file (20100009648.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A copy of the applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows in section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States) that he served in Germany during the period 27 September 1963 through 22 July 1965. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action, that he required...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023422

    Original file (20100023422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his honorable service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 by: a. adding the entry "HONORABLE" to item 13a; b. adding the entry "DD Form 256A" to item 13b; and c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004703

    Original file (20110004703.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 3 October 1968, while in Vietnam, Special Orders Number 277, issued by Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division, appointing him to the rank/grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3 (Permanent (P)). On 29 October 1969, Special Orders Number 302, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Personnel Center, Fort Lewis, ordered his release from active duty effective 29 October 1969. Army Regulation 600-200 also states the temporary appointment of Regular Army enlisted personnel in grade in which computed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019611

    Original file (20110019611.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. This case is being considered using reconstructed records which primarily consists of the NA Form 13038 and DD Form 256A provided by the applicant and a DA Form 2139 (Military Pay Voucher) in the applicant's NPRC file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024544

    Original file (20110024544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110024544 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.