Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013048
Original file (20100013048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100013048 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that she be granted former spouse Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) benefits from her former husband who is a deceased former service member (FSM).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she was married to the FSM for over 26 years and had five children when they were divorced in 1974.  She should have received his SBP benefits when he died because his next wife did not do anything during his career and did not bear him any children.

3.  The applicant provides:

* several letters explaining her application
* a copy of her divorce decree from the FSM
* a copy of the FSM's death certificate
* a copy of correspondence from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to her Congressional representative

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant and the FSM were married in Texas on 14 August 1947.

2.  The FSM was commissioned as a Reserve second lieutenant on 13 June 1948 and he entered active duty on 5 September 1950.  He continued to serve and was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel on 29 June 1966.

3.  On 25 June 1964, the FSM made an election under the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan in which he declined the opportunity to receive reduced retired pay in order to provide an annuity for his dependents.

4.  On 28 February 1969, the FSM was retired and was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 March 1969.  He had served 23 years and 24 days of service.  On 21 September 1972, the FSM elected SBP spouse coverage for the applicant.

5.  The applicant and the FSM were divorced in Fairfax County, Virginia, on 5 March 1974.  The divorce decree is silent as to the division of retired pay or the SBP.

6.  On 27 November 1981, the FSM submitted an SBP election change in which he elected to change from no coverage to full spouse coverage.  He named his spouse at the time and it was not the applicant's name.  He indicated that he married his current spouse on 27 April 1974.

7.  The FSM died on 25 October 2009 and his death certificate lists the same spouse's name that is listed as his spouse under the 1981 SBP election.

8.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan and established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  Election of beneficiaries is made by category only, not by name.  Except as provided by law, an election, once made, is irrevocable.

9.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse coverage for retired members.

10.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a FSM, be corrected to show he changed his category of participation in the SBP from spouse to former spouse coverage.

2.  The evidence of record clearly shows the divorce decree between the applicant and the FSM did not contain any provisions directing the FSM to provide SBP benefits to the applicant.

3.  The evidence also shows the FSM remarried and designated his new spouse as the beneficiary of his SBP benefits.  The election by the FSM at the time appears to have been voluntary on his part and is considered an irrevocable election.

4.  Inasmuch as elections are made by category (spouse, former spouse, children, etc.) and since the FSM elected full spouse coverage, his wife at the time of his death is the legal beneficiary of his SBP benefits.

5.  While the applicant's position is certainly understandable, the applicant and the FSM were divorced prior to the enactment of Public Law 98-94; therefore, she was no longer an eligible spouse beneficiary under the SBP and is not entitled to receive a monthly former spouse SBP annuity.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to grant the relief requested.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013048



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013048



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007646

    Original file (20120007646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100067C070208

    Original file (2004100067C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further provides that a surviving spouse eligible to receive RCSBP payments is the widow or widower who is married to the service member at the time of the member's death and who was married to the member at the time of his or her SBP election, was married to the FSM for at least 1 year prior to the death of the FSM or is the parent of a child born to a post- election marriage to the deceased member. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019417

    Original file (20140019417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. On 25 March 1987, the FSM and applicant were divorced. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007341

    Original file (20080007341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the un-remarried former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her ex-husband's records be corrected to show he elected to provide her an annuity as his "former spouse" under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show that the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" on the date of his divorce from the applicant, and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004491

    Original file (20140004491.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests in effect correction of her former husband's record to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The FSM and applicant were divorced on 26 September 2012. Unfortunately, there is no evidence the FSM changed his SBP coverage to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within one year of her divorce.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008412

    Original file (20140008412.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, correction of the FSM's records to show he enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and changed his election from spouse to former spouse so that she may be entitled to an annuity. She provides: * Addendum to DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * Applicant's self-authored statement * Amended Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage Order, dated 25 April 2006 with Separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005569

    Original file (20120005569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel argues that: * T____ was the beneficiary of the SBP when the FSM retired through the date of the divorce; she was never deleted as the SBP beneficiary * The FSM made contact with DFAS and OPM to change the SBP designation to former spouse coverage; OPM complied but DFAS did not * The FSM believed no additional documentation was needed and as such, continued to pay monthly premiums until he was paid up * The Board has previously granted relief, directly or indirectly, in multiple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001066

    Original file (20100001066.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage at the time of their divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. The applicant contends the records of her deceased former spouse should be corrected to show that he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage pursuant to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020161

    Original file (20110020161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the military records of her former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. However, there was no evidence that he had divorced or made a former spouse election under SBP. Once they divorced she was no longer a beneficiary unless the FSM or the applicant submitted a former spouse election to DFAS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004042

    Original file (20120004042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage within 1 year of his divorce, and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Although there is no indication the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" coverage or the applicant deemed the election within 1 year of the divorce, the FSM did notify the...