IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 23 November 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100013047
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests upgrade of his dishonorable discharge.
2. The applicant states, in effect, he believes his record is unjust because the promise to go overseas was not honored by the Army.
3. The applicant provides a four-page letter rendered by his grandson in support of this application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. His military record is not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents on file for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. This case is being considered using the Form 270 (Review of the Staff Judge Advocate).
3. The applicant submitted an AGO Form 01254 (Transcript of Military Record) which shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 January 1946 and served until he was honorably discharged on 9 August 1949.
4. The applicant's record contains a Form 270, dated 6 August 1957, which shows:
* He reenlisted in the RA on 20 February 1950 for 3 years
* On 11 July 1957, he was convicted at a general court-martial (GCM) of desertion from 4 July 1951 through 24 May 1957
* He was sentenced to a forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 6 months, and a dishonorable discharge.
5. The convening authority approved the sentence and after appellate review, directed the execution of the discharge.
6. The applicant submitted an unnotarized four-page personal reference letter rendered by his grandson on 13 October 2009. The grandson essentially provides a synopsis of his grandfather's life and asks that the members of the Board take into consideration all aspects of the applicant's life when rendering their decision because his grandfather is a good person who deserves to be buried with military honors.
7. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy, or instance of leniency, to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
8. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 3-11 (dishonorable discharge) states that a Soldier will be given a dishonorable discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a GCM. The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.
9. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the members service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
10. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was convicted by a GCM of being AWOL from 4 July 1951, during a time of war, to 24 May 1957 and he received a dishonorable discharge. Trial by a GCM was warranted by the serious nature of the offense for which the applicant was charged and convicted. The sentence is commensurate with the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
2. Any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction is prohibited by law. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed. Given the applicant's undistinguished record of service and absent any mitigating factors, the type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate. As a result, clemency is not warranted in this case.
3. There is no evidence which indicates the applicant was not properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time. There is no evidence that all requirements of law and regulations were not met, or the rights of the applicant were not fully protected throughout the separation process. Absent such evidence, regularity must be presumed in this case.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___X_____ __X____ __X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100013047
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006926
One previous conviction was considered. On 18 March 1954, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 615-364 (Enlisted Personnel Discharge Dishonorable and Bad Conduct), by reason of court-martial, and he received a DD. As a result, neither his overall record of service or post-service conduct support clemency in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014193
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013447
This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 6 October 1989, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel), chapter 3, by reason of court-martial -...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025518
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 April 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100025518 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of his dishonorable discharge to a general discharge. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007637
On 21 June 1990, a U.S. Army Court of Military Review noted that prior to his GCM, the applicant had been punished under the provisions of Article 15, UCMJ for two of the many offenses for which he was convicted by court-martial; specifically Charges I and II. This form also shows his character of service as "Dishonorable." _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...
CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 2008-021
… Applying today’s standards, it is unlikely the applicant would be awarded a discharge with a character of service any higher than his current General discharge.” CGPC stated that the applicant’s repeated mis- conduct contradicts his claim to having an “otherwise satisfactory record” and that his General discharge is not “unjust or disproportionate for his offenses and service.” APPLICANT’S RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS OF THE COAST GUARD On March 16, 2008, the applicant responded, stating that he...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002904
His records contain his DA Form 24 (Service Record). He was given a dishonorable discharge pursuant to a general court-martial empowered to adjudge such a discharge. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006603
The Certification of Military Service he was provided, dated 7 November 2012, shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 27 March 1951 and was dishonorably discharged on 27 April 1955. The regulation stated an enlisted person would be dishonorably discharged pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general court-martial imposing a dishonorable discharge. His available military records and the documentation submitted with his application contain no matters upon which the Board should grant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018985
The applicant's military records are not available for review. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018985 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090018985 5 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013512
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's record shows after having prior active military service he enlisted in the Regular Army on 26 March 1979. The conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.