Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012811
Original file (20100012811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  16 December 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012811 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of a second Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded two Bronze Star Medals and he would like his DD Form 214 corrected to show both for his family history.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, effective 22 October 1971; and general orders, citations, and certificates for the awards in question.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 February 1970.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91B (Medical Specialist).  He served in Vietnam from on or about 21 August 1970 to 17 August 1971.  He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion (Airmobile), 506th Infantry.

3.  Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile) issued:

	a.  General Orders Number 5498, dated 3 July 1971, awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in the Republic of Vietnam from September 1970 to June 1971.

	b.  General Orders Number 5720, dated 9 July 1971, awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service in the Republic of Vietnam from 
1 August 1970 to 31 August 1971.

	c.  General Orders Number 9180, dated 5 September 1971, revoked General Orders Number 5720 awarding the Bronze Star Medal. 

4.  He was honorably released from active duty in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 on 22 October 1971.  He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).

5.  There are no orders in his military personnel records that show he was awarded a second Bronze Star Medal.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for a second Bronze Star Medal pertaining to the applicant.

7.  The applicant provided as supporting evidence general orders, award certificates, and award citations which awarded him two Bronze Star Medals which were found in his military personnel file and previously discussed.

8.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Military Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  This regulation stated that 


the Bronze Star Medal may have been awarded for heroism, meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight, but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy including combat, support, and supply operations.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  The first oak leaf cluster is awarded to denote the second and succeeding awards of certain decorations, among which is the Bronze Star Medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his record should be corrected to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The evidence of record shows he was awarded two Bronze Star Medals through the publication and announcement in general orders.  General Orders Numbers 5498, dated 3 July 1971; and General Orders Number 5720, dated 
9 July 1971, were found in his military record.  However, General Orders Numbers 5720 were revoked on 5 September 1971 and there is no available evidence to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with Oak Leaf Cluster to denote a second award.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, there is no basis to correct his record.

3.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012811



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012811



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000825C070205

    Original file (20060000825C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In the absence of a proper award authority for this decoration, the applicant may request a third award of the Bronze Star Medal under the provisions of Section 1130 of Title 10, United States Code. Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division General Orders Number 10444, dated 23 October 1970, show the applicant received the Bronze Star Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending Headquarters, 1st...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019039

    Original file (20080019039.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 05 MARCH 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080019039 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The available records show that General Orders Number 6773 were published on 19 June 1971 awarding him the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for heroism in connection with ground operations in the Republic of Vietnam on 13 March 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014832

    Original file (20110014832.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam/MACV Support Command General Orders Number 2598, dated 15 December 1972, awarded him the Air Medal for the period July 1972 to August 1972. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Changing his MOS in item 23a of his DD Form 214 to read 67N2F; and c. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by deleting the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005642C070206

    Original file (20050005642C070206.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows award of the Air Medal (2d Award) and the Bronze Star Medal. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DD Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile) General Orders Number 14927, dated 7 December 1969, awarded the applicant the award of the Air Medal with Numeral "2". Evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000069

    Original file (20100000069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. There is no evidence in the record of orders which subsequently award the applicant the Army Commendation Medal. Accordingly, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal and his records should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017253

    Original file (20080017253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show a second award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Army Commendation Medal. General Orders Number 2403, dated 5 February 1971, show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in connection with ground forces against a hostile enemy force in the Republic of Vietnam from February 1970 to February 1971. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011261

    Original file (20100011261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show his authorized awards include the Air Medal with "V" Device and oak leaf clusters. However, there is no available evidence that the applicant was awarded the Air Medal with "V" Device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the awards currently shown on his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003089101C070403

    Original file (2003089101C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 11d (Effective Date) on the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was released from active duty on 8 March (no entry for the year). There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009532

    Original file (20080009532.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214; Air Medal orders, dated 6 April 1972; three Air Medal award citations; and a Bronze Star Medal award citation. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and this award should be added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry “AIR MEDAL 4TH AWARD (W/”V” DEVICE)” from his DD Form 214; and b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018436

    Original file (20090018436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and the Purple Heart. Item 24 does show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal with "V" device and is authorized the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his...