Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012471
Original file (20100012471.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012471 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a second award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).  

2.  The applicant states the following:

* He received his first CIB for combat in Panama
* He was assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment in the Gulf War
* All the members of Company B were awarded the CIB in a mass formation at Fort Campbell, KY
* He was never given a copy of the orders
* His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) shows only one award of the CIB

3.  The applicant provides orders for award of the CIB, dated 6 January 1990; 
orders for award of the Army Commendation Medal, dated 1 April 1991; and DA Form 2-1 in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 September 1988.  He completed training as an infantryman and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B.  

3.  His DA Form 2-1 shows he served in Panama from 8 March 1989 to 31 May 1990 and in Saudi Arabia from 8 September 1990 to 9 April 1991.  

4.  Permanent Orders 2-4, dated 6 January 1990, show the applicant was awarded the CIB for service from 20 December 1989 to 6 January 1990.  These orders show he was assigned to Company C, 5th Battalion, 87th Infantry in Panama.  

5.  His service record does not contain orders which show he was awarded a second award of the CIB.  Item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) on his DA Form 2-1 lists one award of the CIB.  

6.  The applicant provided orders, dated 1 April 1991, awarding him the Army Commendation Medal which shows he was assigned to Company B, 1st Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment in Saudi Arabia.  

7.  The applicant was released from active duty on 11 December 1991.  His DD Form 214 shows one award of the CIB.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  The CIB is authorized for qualifying wars, conflicts, and operations in Panama (20 December 1989 to 31 January 1990) and Southwest Asia Conflict (17 January to 11 April 1991).

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a separate award of the CIB has been authorized for qualified Soldiers in any of four conflicts:  

	a.  World War II (7 December 1941 to 3 September 1945);

	b.  the Korean Conflict (27 June 1950 to 27 July 1953); 

	c.  the Vietnam Conflict (which includes service in Vietnam (2 March 1961 to 28 March 1973 and qualifying service in Laos (19 April 1961 to 6 October 1962)), the Dominican Republic (28 April 1965 to 1 September 1966), Korea on the demilitarized zone (4 January 1969 to 31 March 1994), Grenada (23 October to 23 November 1983), Panama (20 December 1989 to 31 January 1990), and the Persian Gulf War (17 January to 11 April 1991); and 

	d.  the War on Terrorism (which includes Afghanistan, Operation Enduring Freedom; and Iraq, Operation Iraqi Freedom).

10.  Subsequent awards of the CIB are not authorized for the same qualifying period.  It is recognized by one award only regardless of whether a Soldier served one or multiple tours in any or all of these areas.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Orders show the applicant was awarded the CIB for service in Panama and this award is recorded on his DD Form 214.  

2.  Although the applicant contends all the members of Company B were awarded the CIB in a mass formation at Fort Campbell, KY there is no evidence in the available record to substantiate his claim.

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Saudi Arabia from 8 September 1990 to 9 April 1991.  

4.  The applicant’s service record shows he was awarded MOS 11B and he served as an infantryman with Company B, 1st Battalion, 187th Infantry Regiment in Saudi Arabia.  

5.  By regulation, the CIB has been authorized for qualified Soldiers in any of four conflicts, one of which is the Vietnam Conflict.  Panama and the Persian Gulf are included within the Vietnam Conflict.  Since the applicant has been awarded the CIB for service in Panama, he is not eligible for a second award of the CIB for his service in Saudi Arabia.  Therefore, the applicant is not eligible for a second award of the CIB.  



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________________________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012471



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012471



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005231

    Original file (20140005231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. The Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. Therefore, he is authorized the Korea Defense Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. Based on his service in SWA from 29 December 1990 to 13 June 1991, he is authorized the KLM-SA and the KLM-K and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003571

    Original file (20090003571.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant served in SWA from 30 August 1990 through 30 March 1991 in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm. Based on the applicant's service in SWA as stated in paragraph 1 above, he is eligible for award of the SWASM with two bronze service stars, the KLM-SA, and the KLM-KU and correction of his records to show these awards. The evidence of record shows the applicant held an infantry MOS and was awarded the CIB for his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000077

    Original file (20150000077.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded or authorized the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with Arrowhead device and the Parachutist Badge with gold combat star. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Parachutist Badge prior to his service in Panama and that he was awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary medal for his service in Panama. Department of the Army General Orders Number...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024255

    Original file (20100024255.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show his award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, awarding him a campaign medal for Operation Just Cause, and to show the correct spelling of his middle name as Aaron. Based on the above facts and findings, it is appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show that in addition to the awards listed on the DD Form 214, the applicant is also authorized the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Panama), Kuwait Liberation Medal-Saudi...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057950C070420

    Original file (2001057950C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that an ARCOM he was awarded is missing from separation document and although he was recommended for the AGCM by his unit commander, he never received the award. It states, in pertinent part, that a member is entitled to receive the AGCM for each 3 years completed. It states, in pertinent part, that there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB; the soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties; must be assigned to an infantry unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016584

    Original file (20130016584.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * completion of the Infantry School and Air Assault School * award of the Army Commendation Medal and Army Achievement Medal * his service during Operation Desert Storm and all corresponding medals 2. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 4 years, 8 months, and 7 days of active service. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016476

    Original file (20140016476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the following awards: * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with one bronze service star * Kuwait Liberation Medal - Saudi Arabia * Kuwait Liberation Medal - Government of Kuwait 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011853C071029

    Original file (20060011853C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Roland S. Venable | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain an administrative error which does not require action by the Board.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008101

    Original file (20110008101.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also states that upon completion of his active duty service he was awarded the ARCOM and the DA Form 638-1 (Recommendation for Award) documenting this award also shows he had been previously awarded the CIB. There are no orders or other documents in the applicant’s NPRC file that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the ARCOM or the CIB by proper authority while serving on active duty. He provides extract from another applicant's ABCMR Record of Proceedings which shows, in part,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073010C070403

    Original file (2002073010C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The...