Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012301
Original file (20100012301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  14 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100012301 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show he served as a security policeman with the 80th General Support Group (GSG) in Vietnam.

2.  The applicant states that he spent his entire time in Vietnam with the 80th GSG as a member of the Security and Reactionary Force; however, his DD Form 214 shows he served with the 560th General Supply Company as a stock control and accounting specialist.  

3.  The applicant provides five photographs of himself in Vietnam and a copy of his plaque designating him guard of the month of the 80th GSG Security Police in January 1969.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in the Army of the United States on 30 November 1966.  He completed the training requirements and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76A (Supply Clerk).

3.  On 9 July 1968, he was transferred to Vietnam and his records show he was assigned to the 560th General Supply Company for duty as a warehouseman.  On 15 August 1968, the applicant requested a dependent identification card application for his wife and he indicated that he was assigned to the 560th General Supply Company.

4.  On 24 November 1968, orders were published by the 560th General Supply Company advancing him to the permanent pay grade of E-3.

5.  On 26 December 1968, orders were published by the 560th General Supply Company advancing him to the temporary pay grade of E-4 in MOS 76P2O (Stock Control and Accounting Specialist).  MOS 76P2O was designated as his primary MOS. 

6.  On 4 April 1969, orders were published by Headquarters, U.S. Army Support Command, DA Nang which reassigned the applicant from the 560th General Supply Company to the U.S. Army Returnee Detachment at Cam Ranh Bay for further assignment to the transfer station at Fort Lewis, Washington.  His clearance papers were issued by the commander of the 560th General Supply Company and the commander issued conduct and efficiency ratings on the applicant.

7.  He departed Vietnam on 6 April 1969 and was transferred to Fort Lewis, Washington where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 8 April 1969 as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 10 months, and 15 days of total active service. 

8.  The DD Form 214 that the applicant was issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he was assigned to the 560th General Supply Company in Vietnam and his MOS was 76P2O.

9.  A review of his official records failed to show any evidence that he was assigned or attached to the 80th GSG or that his primary MOS was that of a security policeman.  His official records contain orders awarding him the specialty of 76P2O and assignment orders to the 560th General Supply Company for the entire period of his assignment in Vietnam.
10.  Army Regulation 635-5 serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that information used on the 
DD Form 214 will be obtained from official records and source documents contained in the official records.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he served as a security policeman in Vietnam with the 80th GSG is not in doubt, there are no official documents contained in his records to show he was assigned to this unit or that he was awarded an MOS as a policeman or security guard.

2.  The applicant's official records show he was assigned to the 560th General Supply Company the entire time that he was in Vietnam and all of his unit administrative processing, to include his promotions, was conducted by the 560th General Supply Company.

3.  Therefore, in the absence of official documents to show otherwise, it must be presumed that his records are correct.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x_____  __x_____  ____x__  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.







2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _ x  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012301



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100012301



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100014499

    Original file (20100014499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect: * He was never awarded MOS 76P2O (stock control and accounting specialist) and he only served in MOS 11B * He never went to advanced individual training (AIT) * His duty MOS was 11B in Vietnam and Germany * He reenlisted as an 11D (armor reconnaissance specialist), but he never got the MOS * The Combat Infantryman Badge was supposed to be on his discharge document * He would have stayed in the service and retired but the Army wouldn't give him MOS 11D, so he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028386

    Original file (20100028386.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) be corrected to show: * He was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), S-5, 3d Brigade 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) and not HHC, 5th Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment * That he was assigned in the military occupational specialty (MOS) of a psychological operations specialist and not a stock control and accounting specialist * That he is authorized the award of the Air Medal * That he is authorized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002024

    Original file (20140002024.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), was assigned to Company D, 52nd Infantry Regiment, held military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B1O (Rifleman), and was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in – * item 22 (MOS) – * Primary MOS (PMOS) 76P2O, Stock Control Specialist, 23 April 1971 * Secondary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020959

    Original file (20090020959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that item 23a (Specialty Number and Title) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending 20 July 1971 be changed to show MOS 11C1O (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman) instead of MOS 76P2O (Stock Control and Accounting Specialist). The applicant contends his 20 July 1971 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show MOS 11C1O in item 23a. The available evidence shows the applicant completed AIT and was awarded MOS 11C1O in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017069

    Original file (20090017069.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows his MOS of 11C1O and that he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), audited on 28 May 1968, shows in: a. item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) he was awarded MOS 11C2O (Infantryman Indirect Fire Crewman) on 1 January 1967; b. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in the RVN from 15 September 1967 through 11 August 1968; c....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014568

    Original file (20090014568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 24 does not show award of the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010167

    Original file (20080010167.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 12 (Last Duty of Assignment and Major Command) and Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected. His record also confirms that on the date of his REFRAD, he held the PMOS of 94B, as evidenced by orders on file in his MPRJ and an entry on his DA Form 20, and that this PMOS is properly listed in Item 23a of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002162

    Original file (20120002162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his specialty number and title as 67H (Cargo Handler). Item 22 (Military Occupational Specialties) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was awarded secondary MOS (SMOS) 61C on 1 June 1967 and primary MOS (PMOS) 57H (Cargo Handler) on 5 December 1967. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 23a of his DD Form 214 the entry "67H2O...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009970

    Original file (20080009970.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge; Army Commendation Medal; Army Achievement Medal; Good Conduct Medal; Army Service Ribbon; and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Pistol, and Grenade Bars. There are no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. Records show the applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and that he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016437

    Original file (20090016437.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 is blank, and the PH is not included in the list of earned awards in item 41 (Awards and Decorations). The applicant's record is void of orders or other documents showing he was reclassified into MOS 11C.