Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011678
Original file (20100011678.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011678 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the last name on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to reflect the last name on his birth certificate.  

2.  The applicant states he was allowed to enter service using the name he used in school instead of the name on his birth certificate.  

3.  The applicant provides copies of his Birth Certificate, Driver's License, and Social Security Card in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant’s record contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) prepared during his enlistment processing.  Item 1 (Name) lists the last name he now claims is incorrect.  He signed this document using the name he now claims is incorrect in three separate places.  

3.  The DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) prepared upon his entry on active duty also lists the last name he now claims is incorrect in item 1 (Name) and the applicant signed the form using the name he now claims is incorrect in item 34 (Signature).  

4.  All the official documents and orders contained in the applicant’s official military personnel file (OMPF) list the same name as it is recorded on his DD Form 4 and on his DA Form 2-1.

5.  On 25 September 1983, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) in the rank of specialist four/E-4, after completing 4 years of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time lists the name as it is recorded in his DD Form 4, on his DA Form 2-1, and in all other documents on file in his OMPF in item 1 (Name).  The applicant authenticated this document with his signature in item 21 (Signature of Member Being Separated) on the date of his REFRAD using the name recorded elsewhere in his record and in item 1 of the DD Form 214.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It states, in pertinent part, that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The regulation also establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214 and contains preparation instructions in chapter 2.  The instructions for completing item 1 state to enter the name as it is recorded in the military record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request that his record and DD Form 214 should be changed to reflect the name recorded in the birth certificate has been carefully considered.  However, while the validity of the name he claims is correct is not in question, the record shows he entered, served, and was separated under the name listed on his DD Form 4, DA Form 2-1, and all documents on file in his OMPF.  


2.  Absent any evidence to confirm the applicant attempted to change his last name while he was still serving, it is presumed he voluntarily chose to serve using the name recorded in his military records.  

3.  The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  There appears to be no compelling reason to compromise the integrity of the Army’s records to correct his name at this late date.

4.  This Record of Proceedings, along with the application and supporting documents will be filed in his military record in order to provide clarity and to deal with any confusion that might arise regarding the difference in his last name.  Filing the Board’s decisional document will also guarantee the historical accuracy of the applicant's military record regarding the name under which he served.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011678



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011678



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009503

    Original file (20090009503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). All of the official documents and orders contained in the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) list the same name as it is recorded on his DD Form 4, DD Form 1966, and DA Form 2-1. The applicant's request that his record reflect his legal last name because he was forced to use his stepfather's name at the time of his enlistment was carefully considered.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023081

    Original file (20100023081.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his record be corrected to show his correct last name. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) prepared during his enlistment processing shows the name he now claims is incorrect and he authenticated this document with his signature using the name he now claims is incorrect on the date of his enlistment and entry on active duty. The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared on the applicant upon his entry on active duty lists the name contained on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009995

    Original file (20060009995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the last name shown on his separation document (DD Form 214) be changed to show his correct last name. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains a Record of Induction (DD Form 47) that lists the last name the applicant now claims is incorrect. The DD Form 398 and DD form 1584 also shows that the last name of the applicant's father was the same last name used by the applicant upon his entry on active duty, and that the last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000227

    Original file (20090000227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the last name listed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) be changed to show the last name listed on his birth certificate. While it is understandable why the applicant would like to have his last name changed in his military records and on his DD Form 214 to match his birth certificate, the available records show he entered the military, served, and was separated under the last...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072611C070403

    Original file (2002072611C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: While the Board understands the applicant’s desire to now record his correct last name in the separation documents in question, it finds no evidence that suggests that the applicant has or would suffer any injury or injustice as a result of the Army maintaining these documents as they were correctly prepared at...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017367

    Original file (20080017367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, that his record be corrected to reflect his correct first and middle names. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time lists his first and middle names in the order and with the spelling of his middle name he now claims is incorrect in Item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013577

    Original file (20090013577.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 14 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090013577 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the first and middle names recorded in his military records be corrected. However, while the validity of the name he claims is correct is not in question, the record shows he entered, served, and was separated under the first and middle names that are listed on his DD Form 47, DA Form 20, and all documents on file in his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018876

    Original file (20090018876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared on the applicant upon his entry onto active duty lists the name contained on his DD Form 4 in item 1 (Name and Service Number) and his social security account number. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time lists the name as it is recorded on his enlistment record, his DA Form 20, and in all other documents on file in his OMPF.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013015

    Original file (20140013015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). All documents contained in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) list the same last name he now claims is incorrect. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011982C071029

    Original file (20060011982C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: SSAN Card; Birth Certificate; Third-Party Statements (3); and DD Form 214. However, the evidence of record confirms the SSAN shown on the applicant's DD Forms 214 is identical to the SSAN recorded on his Personnel Qualification Record and matches the SSAN listed in the military records prepared on him upon his entry on active duty and in all orders and other documents prepared on him throughout his active duty...