Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011560
Original file (20100011560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011560 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the Service Number (SN) and Social Security Number (SSN) listed on his DD Form 214 ( Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected.  

2.  The applicant states the SN and SSN listed on his DD Form 214 are incorrect and he believes this was due to typographical errors.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and of his SSN Card in support of his application. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant’s record contains a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) completed by the applicant on 13 April 1966, during his enlistment processing.  This document lists his SSN with the number 1 as the third digit.  It also contains a DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record) that lists his SN with the number 8 as the second digit.  

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlistment Qualification Record) prepared on the applicant on 23 September 1966, upon his entry on active duty, lists his SN using the number 8 as the second digit and the number 1 as the third digit of his SSN in item 1 (Name and Service Number).  

4.  All orders and other documents on file in the applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (DA Form 201), including a DA Form 873 (Certificate of Clearance and or Security Determination), list his SN using the number 8 as the second digit and his SSN listing the number 1 as the third digit. 

5.  On 26 April 1969, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of specialist four/E-4, after completing 2 years, 7 months, and 7 days of active military service.  Item 2 (Service Number) of the DD Form 214 in his record that was issued upon his separation correctly lists his SN using the number 8 as the second digit.  Item 3 (Social Security Number) lists his SSN erroneously using the number 2 as the third digit.  

6.  The applicant provides a copy of a DD Form 214 that erroneously lists his 
SN with the number 0 as the second digit in item 2 and his SSN with the number 2 as the third digit in item 3.  This document is a copy and item 2 is unclear and appears to have been altered during copying.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the documents to be issued Soldiers upon separation and provides guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant’s separation provided for using the DA Form 20 and documents on file in the DA Form 201 as the source records for entries on the DD Form 214.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that the SN listed on his DD Form 214 is incorrect has been carefully considered.  However, although the copy of the DD Form 214 provided by the applicant appears to contain an incorrect number of 0 as the second digit of the SN in item 2, the DD Form 214 in his record clearly lists the correct number 8 as the second digit.  As a result, no further action by the Board is required on this portion of the requested relief.  A copy of the DD Form 214 in the record will be provided to the applicant for his information and use.  
2.  The applicant’s contention that the SSN entered in item 3 of his DD Form 214 incorrectly lists the number 2 as the third digit has also been carefully considered and found to have merit.  The DD Form 398 prepared by the applicant during his enlistment processing, the DA Form 20 prepared on him upon his entry on active duty, and all documents in his 201 file that contain an SSN list it using the correct number 1 as the third digit.  Therefore, it appears the SSN was erroneously entered in item 3 of his DD Form 214 using the incorrect number 2 as the third digit as a result of an administrative error.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 3 of his DD Form 214 accordingly. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant 
a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected 
by:

   a.  providing him a copy of the official DD Form 214 in his record containing the correct SN;
   
   b.  amending item 3 of his DD Form 214 by deleting the number 2 listed as the third digit of his SSN and adding the number “1”; and

   c.  providing him a document that contains the above change.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011560



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011560



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005073

    Original file (20140005073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 7 January 1967, in conjunction with his enlistment in the Regular Army, the applicant completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) wherein he listed his SSN with the second and third digits as "72." DISCUSSION AND...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024396

    Original file (20110024396.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 August 1969. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains two documents listing the SSN using the number “8” as the second digit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 3 of his DD Form 214 by replacing the second digit of the SSN listed in item 3 with the number "6" as it is listed on his SSN card.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004462

    Original file (20140004462.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 7 June 1966 to show his social security number (SSN) as XX4-XX-XXXX vice XX9-XX-XXXX. Item 32 (Remarks) of the DD Form 214 he was issued for this period of service shows the third digit of his SSN as "9." Item 3 (SSN) of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) he was issued for this period of service shows the third digit of his SSN as "4."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001266

    Original file (20120001266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared on him on 27 December 1968 lists his SSN using the number “7” as the fourth digit and the number "3" as the sixth digit in item 1 (Name and SN). The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains two documents listing the SSN using the number “3” as the fourth digit and the number "7" as the sixth digit. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014359

    Original file (20140014359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states the SSN shown on his DD Form 214 is incorrect; the second and third digits of his SSN are 83 and not 38. Item 3 (SSN) of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows his SSN with the second and third digits as 38. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows that upon the applicant's induction into the AUS, he listed his SSN with the second and third digits as 83 and this is the SSN he used throughout his active duty service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023891

    Original file (20110023891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His DD Form 47 (Induction Record) does not list an SSN. The evidence of record confirms the applicant provided his correct SSN containing the number "5" as the eighth digit at the time of his induction and it was recorded in several documents and orders throughout his military service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110007862

    Original file (20110007862.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his service number (SN) and social security number (SSN) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 7 April 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that item 2 of the applicant's DD Form 214 be corrected to show the fifth digit of his SN as "2" and that item 3 of his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the second and third digits of his SSN as “83.” _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015630

    Original file (20080015630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s induction record, dated 6 June 1968, and his DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History), dated 13 June 1968, show the second digit of his SSN is “6” and the third digit is “5.” These records also show he was born on 12 March 1944. Evidence of record shows the applicant’s second digit of his SSN is “6” and the third digit is “5.” Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 3 on his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows the applicant was born on 12 March 1944.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007454

    Original file (20100007454.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which was prepared upon his entry on active duty on 22 November 1966, also lists the SSN he now claims is correct in item 1 (Name and Service Number). The evidence of record confirms the SSN the applicant now claims is correct is listed on all documents and forms contained in his record other than the DD Form 214 he was issued on 8 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004123

    Original file (20110004123.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared on him on 5 August 1966 lists his SSN using the number “5” as the fourth digit in item 1 (Name and Service Number (SN)). The evidence of record confirms the applicant enlisted in and served under the SSN containing the number “5” as the fourth digit as he now claims is correct, as evidenced by the DD Form 398, DA Form 20, and orders and...