Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011509
Original file (20100011509.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011509 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show award of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the EIB and CIB in 1991.  He goes on to state that he served in Operation Desert Storm while his unit was in Germany and some of his unit was sent to a war zone.  He also states that his unit knew the medals were sent to him by the Department of the Army after they returned and he forwarded them to his father in Colorado.

3.  The applicant provides no documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 17 January 1991, the applicant was ordered to active duty from the U.S. Army Reserve in support of Operation Desert Shield/Desert Storm.  He was released from active duty on 18 May 1991.  His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for this period does not show he served in Southwest Asia.  It does not show he was awarded the EIB or the CIB.

3.  On 1 February 2007, while serving in the pay grade of E-6 in the South Dakota Army National Guard (SDARNG), he was honorably discharged and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired).

4.  His Report of Separation and Record of Service (NGB Form 22) shows he held the primary specialty numbers of:

* (primary) – 21H3O Construction Engineer Supervisor
* (secondary) – 13B3O Cannon Crewmember
* (additional) – 11B3O Infantryman

5.  His decorations do not include awards of the EIB and the CIB.  Areview of his official military personnel file (OMPF) failed to reveal orders for award of the EIB or CIB.  Additionally, there is no indication that the applicant served in combat while assigned to an infantry unit or that he successfully completed the EIB proficiency test.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Award of the CIB is announced in orders.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states award of the EIB requires that an individual must have satisfactorily completed the prescribed proficiency tests while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of at least battalion size.  To be eligible for testing and award of the EIB, a Soldier must be in an active Army status and must have an infantry or Special Forces specialty.  Award of the EIB is announced in orders.

8.  The Defense Manpower Data Center compiled the Desert Shield/Storm Data Base.  The primary Desert Shield/Storm file contains one record for each active duty member who participated in-theater between 2 August 1990 and 31 July 1991 and one record for each Reserve/National Guard member or retiree who was activated or federalized in response to Desert Shield/Desert Storm.  

9.  The applicant's name is not listed on the Desert Shield/Storm Data Base.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he was awarded the EIB and the CIB has been noted and appears to lack merit.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record that he was in fact awarded the EIB and the CIB.

2.  The applicant has not submitted and his records do not contain orders awarding him the EIB or the CIB.  There is no evidence to show he served in a combat zone, and he does not appear to contend that he did serve in a combat zone.  Therefore, in the absence of orders there appears to be no basis to add these awards to his record at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011509



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011509



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012613

    Original file (20130012613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) and Kuwait Liberation Medal (KLM). The applicant states in a handwritten note on an internet printout of the KLM criteria that the 5th Battalion, 21st Infantry Regiment, 7th Infantry Division, had orders and was staged at a holding base in the Mojave Desert in preparation to be deployed for approximately 3 weeks. There is no evidence that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002899

    Original file (20140002899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show the dates of his foreign service in Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War, the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), and the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB). His records do not contain orders that show he was awarded the CIB or the EIB. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to show the dates of his foreign service in the Gulf War and award the CIB and the EIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006164

    Original file (20140006164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB) and any additional commendations for his service in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. There are no orders in the applicant's service personnel records awarding him the EIB or any other commendations, awards, or decorations that are not listed on his DD Form 214. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states award of the EIB...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073026C070403

    Original file (2002073026C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214; orders for the EIB; a Certificate of Training for the German Language Orientation Program; a Certificate of Achievement for exemplary service at ROTC Advanced Camp; his Educational Development Record; and a correspondence course completion notice for the Combat Lifesaver Course. The primary Desert Shield/Storm file contains one record for each active duty member who participated in-theater between 2 August 1990 and 31 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021499

    Original file (20130021499.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence shows the applicant was an infantryman assigned to an ADA unit during his deployed service in support of Operations Desert Shield and Desert Storm. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011399

    Original file (20060011399.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    x The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) or other Gulf War medals added to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that service in the Persian Gulf War is to be recognized by award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal to Army members who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013396

    Original file (20130013396.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded or authorized the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB). The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 for the period ending 8 February 1985 * DD Form 214 for the period ending 11 December 1992 * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 12 August 1991 and annotated as Permanent Orders (PO) Number 46-22, issued by the 207th Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019547

    Original file (20140019547.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22, as amended by Military Personnel Message 08-190, states the CIB may be awarded to an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and actively participating in such ground combat. Although the applicant contends that his unit was awarded the CIB after his discharge, the CIB is an individual award and not a unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007613

    Original file (20080007613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). His DD Form 214 does not show the CIB as an authorized award. The evidence shows the applicant held an infantry MOS, and he was deployed to Southwest Asia from 15 February 1991 to 15 March 1991 (1 month).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004292

    Original file (20120004292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, he requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM). His military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB. There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant should be awarded the CIB.