Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011436
Original file (20100011436.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011436 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he performed his duties honorably and he was unjustly discharged 1 month before his expiration term of service (ETS) date.

3.  The applicant provides a letter of support.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 March 1976 for a period of 4 years establishing an ETS date of 30 March 1980.  He was awarded the military occupational specialty of power generator and wheeled vehicle mechanic and he was advanced to pay grade E-3, which is the highest grade he held during his tenure of service.

3.  Records show he accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on three occasions between 15 January and 21 September 1979 for wrongfully appearing at the platoon sergeant's office with an unclean uniform and boots; needing a shave; being disrespectful in language towards the charge of quarters; and attempting to steal candy bars from the post exchange concessions.

4.  His records show he was counseled on seven occasions.  The counseling statements that were completed by his leadership during the period 22 May to   19 October 1979 indicate effort was extended to rehabilitate the applicant for his poor personal hygiene, poor maintenance of his personal area, poor performance, poor conduct, repeatedly driving a military vehicle without a driver license, writing bad checks, being drunk and disorderly, and not having soap for laundering his clothes to list only a few of the issues.  In one statement, his company commander indicated the applicant's intent was to get out of the Army and return home.  On another occasion it was determined that he had not washed or changed his bedding in 2 months and this and similar behavior related to his personal hygiene was having an adverse impact on other Soldiers.

5.  On 27 August 1979, the applicant's commander notified him of his intention to initiate action to separate him from the Army.  On the same date his commander recommended that he be separated from the military under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13, due to unsuitability.  The applicant's commander indicated the applicant was unable to maintain his personal hygiene, personal property, and military equipment in a satisfactory manner.  The applicant had many chances to correct these behaviors but he failed to respond.

6.  The applicant's intermediate commander's recommendation for approval stated he had personally counseled the applicant, explained the implications associated with a chapter 13 elimination, and the applicant persisted in his desire to leave the service.

7.  On 21 September 1979, the applicant acknowledged he had been counseled and advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action under provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) and its effects, of the rights available to him, and the effect of any action taken by him in waving his rights.  The applicant did not elect to submit a statement in his own behalf.   

8.  On 17 January 1980, the separation authority approved the recommendation for separation under the provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200, for unsuitability.  He directed that the applicant be discharged from the service and issued a general discharge.

9.  On 11 February 1980, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 13 by reason of unsuitability, with a general discharge.  The DD Form 214 issued to him shows he completed a total of 3 years, 10 months, and 11 days of active service.

10.  There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

11.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 13 of the regulation in effect at the time established policy and provided procedures and guidance for eliminating enlisted personnel found to be unfit or unsuitable for further military service.  In pertinent part, it provided for the separation of individuals for unsuitability when it was established that in the judgment of his commander, he will not develop sufficiently to participate satisfactory in further military training and/or become a satisfactory Soldier.

12.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he performed his duties honorably and he was unjustly discharged 1 month before his ETS date.  The available evidence shows the applicant was discharged less than 2 months prior to his ETS date.  However, prior to discharge he was counseled on numerous occasions in regard to his poor personal appearance, personal hygiene, attention to detail, and driving a military vehicle without a license on more than one occasion.  The available evidence further indicates he accepted NJP on three occasions and he persisted in his desire to leave the service.  Such conduct certainly warrants an administrative separation from the Army.



2.  Based on his record of indiscipline, his service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  His misconduct also renders his service unsatisfactory.  Therefore, he is not entitled to an honorable discharge.

3.  The available evidence confirms that his rights were protected throughout the discharge process.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011436



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011436



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005953

    Original file (20090005953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 20 June 1974, the applicant acknowledged he had been counseled and advised of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him for unsuitability under provisions of chapter 13, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel). When separation for unsuitability was warranted, an honorable or general discharge was issued as determined by the separation authority based upon the individual’s entire record.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075789C070403

    Original file (2002075789C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 December 1980, NJP was imposed against the applicant for wrongfully having in his possession 1 gram, more or less, of marihuana on 16 December 1980. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: Carl W. S. Chun Director, Army Board for Correction of Military RecordsINDEXCASE IDAR2002075789SUFFIXRECONDATE BOARDED20021119TYPE OF DISCHARGE(GD)DATE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003106C070205

    Original file (20060003106C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 September 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003106 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. Since the applicant’s record of service included one nonjudicial punishment and adverse counseling statements, his record of service did...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011468

    Original file (20140011468.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) to carefully consider the revised PTSD criteria, detailed medical considerations and mitigating factors when taking action on applications from former service members administratively discharged UOTHC and who have been diagnosed with PTSD by a competent mental health professional representing a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012256

    Original file (20080012256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 26 August 1981, the applicant’s immediate commander initiated a Bar to Enlistment/Reenlistment Certificate against the applicant citing his three instances of nonjudicial punishment and extensive history of counseling. This form further shows he completed 4 years and 9 months of creditable active military service. XXX _________________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9610590C070209

    Original file (9610590C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The applicant's record of disciplinary infractions began before he received his injury. The VA documentation he submits as evidence states he did not experience any problems until sometime in 1979, five years after his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002429

    Original file (20070002429.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 8 (Statement of Examinee’s Present Health and Medications Currently Used), shows the applicant noted, “Epilepsy & Dilantin - Good.” The applicant's military service records also contain an SF 88, dated 14 April 1980, prepared by the physician upon his medical examination of the applicant prior to his separation from the U.S. Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant’s medical condition (i.e., epilepsy) is documented in his military service records; specifically, in his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004131C070206

    Original file (20050004131C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 September 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004131 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The counseling statement provided by the Chaplain does not indicate that he (chaplain) was made aware of the applicant’s psychological or personal problems.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009250

    Original file (20090009250.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that: a. his general discharge be upgraded to a fully honorable discharge; b. his separation program designator (SPD) code be removed from his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); c. his reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3" be changed to a "2" or "1"; d. the remark "apathy" be removed from his narrative reason for separation; e. item 12a (Date Entered [Active Duty] This Period) of his DD Form 214 be changed from 1 July 1980 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009447

    Original file (20130009447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence shows the applicant received counseling on 10 separate occasions regarding his conduct. There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. ___________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.