Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011312
Original file (20100011312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  23 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100011312 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the issuance of a DD Form 2 (Armed Forces of the United States - Geneva Conventions Identification Card (Reserve)).  He also wishes to have a copy of his corrected DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) enclosed with the Board's decision.

2.  The applicant states he was discharged from active duty on 26 March 2003 and later requested corrections to his DD Form 214.  The changes were granted; however, he did not receive a military identification card upon his transition to the inactive Reserve.  He believes this is an error and wishes to be granted these privileges.

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documentation in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 September 1997.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 91W (Health Services Specialist).  The highest pay grade he held on active duty was specialist/E-4.

2.  On 26 March 2003, he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations), chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance with a general under honorable conditions characterization of service.

3.  On 21 July 2003, he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge.  On 4 February 2004, the ADRB granted partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable.  They found his unsatisfactory performance was mitigated by his diagnosed mood disorder and his service of sufficient merit to warrant an upgrade of his discharge.

4.  New separation documents were prepared for his signature and provided to him on 11 March 2004.  The corrected DD Form 214 shows he was discharged with an honorable characterization of service.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-14 (Identification Cards for Members of the Uniformed Services, Their Eligible Family Members, and Other Eligible Personnel) provides policy and guidance concerning the issuance of military identification cards.  It states the card will be surrendered upon expiration; confinement; death; retirement; discharge with no further reserve obligation or Service/Agency affiliations; grade change; to replace a lost, stolen, mutilated, or destroyed card; to correct an error; name change; or to show a significant change in facial features.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests issuance of a DD Form 2 (Reserve) and a copy of his corrected DD Form 214.

2.  The evidence of record shows the ADRB corrected his DD Form 214 to show he was honorably discharged on 26 March 2003; however, he contends he was transferred to the inactive Reserve.  His DD Form 214 clearly shows he was discharged and did not have any remaining military service obligation.  By regulation, he is required to surrender his military identification card upon discharge from the service and he is not entitled to have or to be issued a DD Form 2 (Reserve).

3.  In view of the foregoing, his request for a Reserve identification card should be denied.  However, a copy of his current DD Form 214 will be provided to him with the Board's decision.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x__  ___x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011312



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100011312



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007911

    Original file (20140007911.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His original discharge was upgraded by the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) to an honorable discharge (i.e., general discharge). c. A Resignation in Lieu of Trial by General Court-Martial memorandum, dated 12 September 2003, wherein the separation authority recommended approval of the applicant's resignation and the applicant's separation with an under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge. A Chronological Statement of Retirement Points, dated 21 May 2013, which shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005256

    Original file (20130005256.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 March 1986, he was advised by his unit commander that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Army for misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) provides guidance for hearings and the disposition of applications. Based on this record of indiscipline, his service during the period in question clearly did not meet the standards of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013423

    Original file (20100013423 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). During its review of the applicant's 2004 application and the evidence he presented, the Board concluded there was insufficient evidence to support the applicant's request for transfer to the Retired Reserve and to be issued a 20-year letter and military identification card. It further shows the applicant's commander, while indicating he would support the applicant's resignation request, advised...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018635

    Original file (20130018635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct first name as "Sanyou" vice "San Y." He also states he was released from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) after 8 years of service, but was not issued a DD Form 214. The applicant's first name when he enlisted in the USAR, throughout his service, and at the time he was released from active duty was "Sanyou" without a middle initial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008946

    Original file (20120008946.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the narrative reason and separation code shown on his discharge document. On 3 October 1995, the applicant's company commander notified him that he was recommending him for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14 (Misconduct), paragraph 14-12c, due to commission of a serious offense. The applicant's DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000429

    Original file (20150000429.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), retirement orders, and retired identification card to show he retired as a first sergeant (1SG)/E-8. He provided: a. a DA Form 4187, dated 13 March 2004, which shows he was laterally appointed from MSG to 1SG effective 5 March 2004; b. his ERB which shows his duty title as 1SG with SQI "M" from 5 March 2004 to 16 October 2004; c. his NCOER covering the period April 2004 through...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011386

    Original file (20080011386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: a. On 16 May 1994, she was discharged.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011150

    Original file (20100011150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 April 1985, at Camp Casey, Korea, a board of officers convened to hear testimony and review evidence pertaining to whether the applicant should be discharged from the Army for unsatisfactory performance. There is no record the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board seeking a discharge upgrade during that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 provides that Soldiers with more than 6 years of total active and Reserve military service at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009870

    Original file (20100009870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 12 (Record of Service), block b (Separation Date This Period), shows "970919" (i.e., 19 September 1997). There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he held the rank of PFC/E-3 at any time during the period of active service that is under review in this case. Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation from active duty, prescribed the separation documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005492

    Original file (20090005492.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was granted a clemency discharge, but he has yet to see it reflected on a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served on active duty using a date of birth of 7 April 1949.