Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010859
Original file (20100010859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010859 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with “V” Device.

2.  The applicant states that he was awarded the CIB and the ARCOM with “V” Device; however, they were not included on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

3.  The applicant provides:

* A copy of his DD Form 214
* A copy of a Vietnam Combat Certificate 
* A copy of an ARCOM citation and certificate
* A copy of a combat stressor document prepared by the applicant

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame 


provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant and his twin brother were inducted in Albuquerque, New Mexico on 15 December 1966.  They were transferred to Fort Bliss, Texas to undergo their basic training.  The applicant completed his basic training and was transferred to Fort Huachuca, Arizona to undergo his advanced individual training as a supply clerk.  

3.  The applicant subsequently served at Fort Meade, Maryland and Fort Hood, Texas before being transferred to Vietnam on 14 October 1968.  He was assigned the duties of a supply clerk in Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 13th Signal Battalion, 1st Cavalry Division.  He was advanced to the pay grade of E-4 on 27 December 1968 and he departed Vietnam on 13 May 1969 for Oakland Army Base, California where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee.  He had served 1 year, 11 months, and 22 days of total active service and had 157 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.

4.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the ARCOM.

5.  General Orders Number 4573 issued by Headquarters 1st Cavalry Division on 13 April 1969 awarded the applicant the ARCOM for meritorious service from October 1968 to May 1969.  

6.  A search of the applicant’s official records failed to show that the applicant was ever awarded an infantryman military occupational specialty (MOS) or that he was ever awarded a CIB or an ARCOM with “V” Device. 

7.  A search of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, a web-based index containing roughly 611,000 general orders issued between 1965 and 1973 for the Vietnam era, also failed to produce an order which awarded the applicant the ARCOM with “V” Device.



8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer personnel who have an infantry or MOS.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.  Battle or campaign participation credit alone is not sufficient; the unit must have been in active ground combat with the enemy during the period.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he was awarded the CIB and the ARCOM with “V” Device has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application, and there is no evidence of record to show, that he was awarded the CIB and the ARCOM with “V” Device.

3.  There simply are no orders to show that he was awarded the CIB and the ARCOM with “V” Device and the evidence is absent any evidence to show that he was even qualified to be awarded the CIB for his service in Vietnam because there is no evidence to show that he served as an infantryman.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of competent orders and evidence, there appears to be no basis to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010859





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010859



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008788

    Original file (20100008788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Additionally, there is no evidence in his records that show that he was awarded an infantry specialty. There is no indication that he served as a commander of an infantry unit while in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016028

    Original file (20080016028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board further determined that the applicant was not awarded SMOS 11F until 13 October 1969, subsequent to his RVN service, and that his record failed to show he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM with “V” Device for Valor. The applicant's record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the CIB or BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015365

    Original file (20080015365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that he served as a combat infantryman in Vietnam and that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that during his first 4 months in Vietnam he was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 173rd Airborne Brigade. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000373C070208

    Original file (20040000373C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 January 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040000373 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states, in effect, that due to an administrative oversight, he was never awarded a PH he was entitled to based on being wounded in action on 5 August 1969, while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN)....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010157

    Original file (20080010157.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders showing the applicant was recommended for or awarded the CIB. The evidence in the official record shows the applicant held MOS 05B during the time he served in the RVN, although his DA Form 20 shows he performed duties as a scout observer (11F) with an infantry regiment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the AGCM (First Award) for the qualifying period of service from 23...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014504

    Original file (20070014504.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This DD Form 214 does show award of the Bronze Star Medal, ARCOM, Air Medal, National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, and the Vietnam Campaign Medal. The applicant's military service records do not contain orders for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, he is entitled to have his record corrected to show award of the ARCOM with "V" Device.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010578

    Original file (20130010578.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. The applicant was serving as an infantryman in an infantry unit when he was cited for award of the ARCOM with "V" Device for heroism in connection with military operations against a hostile force in Vietnam which is sufficient evidence to show he was authorized award of the CIB. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000991

    Original file (20150000991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders for the ARCOM or CIB in the applicant's available records. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the ARCOM as an authorized award; however, there are no orders for the ARCOM in the applicant's available records. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 5 January 1968 through 18 December 1969, b. deleting award of the ARCOM and VSM from his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022467

    Original file (20100022467.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 14 May 1968 through 11 April 1969. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 16 November 1967 through 14 November 1969 and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010430

    Original file (20110010430.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, three additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). The applicant states, in effect: * He never received several of the above awards * He was under the impression that the above awards would follow him from Vietnam to his next duty station, Fort Bragg, NC * He served in Vietnam from (July 1966 to July 1967) * The day he...