IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010635 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant states he had a family hardship.  Prior to his marriage, his spouse had a child whom he raised like his own.  The father of this child was very abusive to her and his abuse continued for a while.  Even after the applicant joined the Army and his wife got pregnant, the man's abuse of his wife continued. He complained to his chain of command but no one would listen to him.  As there was no other way to resolve the issue, he went in an absent without leave (AWOL) status.  He was a good family man then and he is a good family man today.  The things he said to his officers were out of frustration and not out of disrespect.

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) and 15 statements, letters of support, and/or character reference letters.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AC97-102974 on     25 February 1998.

2.  The applicant submitted 15 statements or letters of support which were not previously considered by the ABCMR.  Therefore, they are considered new evidence and as such warrant consideration by the Board.

3.  His records show he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 2 years on 28 February 1974 and he was subsequently assigned to Fort Leonard Wood, MO, for completion of training.

4. On 22 March 1974, he departed his unit in an AWOL status; however, he voluntarily returned on 2 April 1974.  On 5 April 1974, he again departed his unit in an AWOL status but this time, on 8 April 1974, he was apprehended by military authorities.

5.  On 10 April 1974, he was placed in pre-trial confinement while his command preferred court-martial charges against him for two specifications of AWOL.

6.  On 10 April 1974, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for two specifications of being AWOL from 22 March to 2 April 1974 and from
5 April to 9 April 1974.

7.  On 26 April 1974, after his release from pre-trial confinement, he again departed his unit in an AWOL status, returning to his unit on 28 April 1974.

8.  On 6 May 1974, he consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial for an offense punishable by a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other than honorable conditions, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the possible effects of a request for discharge, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him.  Following consultation with legal counsel, he requested discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial.

9.  In his request for discharge, he acknowledged he was making this request of his own free will and had not been subjected to any coercion whatsoever by any person.  He also indicated he understood that by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charges against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a dishonorable discharge.  He further acknowledged he understood that if the discharge request were approved, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration (VA), and that he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws.  His request also stated, "Moreover, I hereby state that under no circumstances do I desire further rehabilitation, for I have no desire to perform further military service."

10.  With his request for discharge, he submitted a statement wherein he indicated that he felt he could not take orders or fully carry them out.  He had problems with drugs and alcohol and he was seeking help and he thought the Army would help him with these problems.  He would just go AWOL again no matter how many times the Army brought him back.  He knew he would lose his benefits (GI Bill, financial and hospital rights, and others) but stated "I don't care and I don't give a d***."  He added "I'll clearly say I will accept an undesirable discharge and frame it in my living room."

11.  On 21 and 30 May 1974, his immediate, intermediate, and senior commanders recommended approval of the applicant's discharge with the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.

12.  On 8 June 1974, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial, and directed issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.

13.  On 1 July 1974, he was accordingly discharged.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. This form further confirms he completed 2 months and 29 days of net active service this period with 35 days of time lost.

14.  There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations.

15.  He submitted 15 letters of support or character reference letters from various friends, family members, and colleagues wherein the authors describe him as an honest and trustworthy family man with good standing in the church and community.  Additionally, the authors mostly focused on the applicant's integrity and his need of medical assistance.

16.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of the version in effect at the time provided that a member who committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment included a punitive discharge, could submit a request for discharge for the good of the service at any time after court-martial charges were preferred,.  Commanders would ensure that an individual was not coerced into submitting a request for discharge for the good of the service.  Consulting counsel would advise the member concerning the elements of the offense or offenses charged, type of discharge normally given under the provisions of this chapter, the loss of Veterans Administration benefits, and the possibility of prejudice in civilian life because of the characterization of such a discharge.  An Undesirable Discharge Certificate would normally be furnished an individual who was discharged for the good of the Service. 

17.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

18.  Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.  A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends his undesirable discharge should be upgraded to an honorable discharge.

2.  The applicant's records show he was charged with the commission of offenses punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge.  Discharges under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, are voluntary requests for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He voluntarily, willingly, and in writing requested discharge from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.  Further, his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.

3.  Based on his record of indiscipline, his service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.  This misconduct also renders his service unsatisfactory.  Therefore, he is not entitled to an upgrade of his discharge to either an honorable or a general discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AC97-10297, dated 25 February 1998.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010635



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010635



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1