IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 7 October 2010
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100010466
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the United States Army be set aside and that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show that he was medically retired by reason of permanent disability.
2. The applicant states, in effect, he feels he should have been medically retired and would be unfit for duty. He refers the Board to his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation rating of 50 percent. He contends a rating of 30 percent or more found by the VA or the military should entitle one to a medical retirement.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his VA Rating Decision letter, dated 25 July 2008, and a copy of his DD Form 214
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Information available to the Board indicates that the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 3 August 2000 for a period of 8 years. He was released from DEP status on 6 September 2000, and enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 September 2000.
2. A copy of his Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 14 June 2007, shows in section IV (Personal/Family Data) that he had a P-physical capacity or stamina, U-upper extremities, L-lower extremities, H-hearing and ears, E-eyes, and S-psychiatric (PULHES) rating of "111111" and his physical category was listed as "A." The last physical examination as recorded on this form shows it occurred on 8 August 2005.
3. A copy of a DA Form 2166-8 (Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER)), for the period ending 31 January 2008, shows in Part IV (Values/NCO Responsibilities), item c (Physical Fitness and Military Bearing), he was issued a medical profile on 20 November 2007. The rater entered "ability to perform assigned duties was not hindered" and gave him a rating of "needs some improvement."
4. There is no additional information or medical records contained in the available records.
5. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. This document shows he was honorably released from active duty on 29 March 2008 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement), St. Louis, MO. Item 25 (Separation Authority) shows he was separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Personnel Separations), by reason of completion of required service. He served a total of 7 years, 6 months, and
23 days of net active service. He was assigned an SPD code of "MBK" and a reentry (RE) code of "1."
6. On 25 July 2008, the VA Regional Office, Montgomery, Alabama, issued a rating decision on the applicant. The VA found the applicant was seen on
24 August 2007 for trouble sleeping due to holding his breath during his sleep. On 21 September 2007, he reported complaints of snoring and excessive daytime somnolence. On 5 October 2007, he underwent a sleep study at Walter Reed Army Medical Center and the study revealed severe obstructive sleep apnea. A Continuous Airway Pressure (CPAP) was prescribed on 13 December 2007. The VA determined the condition was service-connected and assigned a 50 percent disability rating. The remainder of the applicant's claim shows the following:
* Left shoulder degenerative joint disease service connected 0 percent
* Hypertension - service connected 0 percent
* Bilateral ankle pain not service connected - denied
* Pes Planus not service connected denied
* Shin Splints not service connected denied
7. Chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual
and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable of performing and if reclassification action is warranted. Four numerical designations (1-4) are used to reflect different levels of functional capacity in six factors (PULHES). In pertinent part, numerical designator "1" under all factors indicates that an individual is considered to possess a high level of medical fitness and, consequently, is medically fit for any military assignment.
8. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve. This regulation includes a list of Armed Forces reentry codes. In pertinent part, RE Code 1 applies to persons completing their term of service and who are considered fully qualified to reenter the Army.
9. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that the SPD code of "MBK" applies to persons who are voluntarily separated under the provisions of chapter 4, Army Regulation 635-200.
10. Army Regulation 635-40 (Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES)) establishes and sets forth the policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. It states, in pertinent part, that after establishing the fact that a Solider is unfit because of a physical disability, and that the Soldier is entitled to benefits, the PEB must decide the percentage rating for each unfitting disability. The VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities is used to establish this rating.
11. Army Regulation 635-40 states that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and they can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service. When a Soldier is being processed for separation for reasons other than physical disability, continued performance of assigned duty commensurate with his or her rank or grade until the Soldier is scheduled for separation, is an indication that the applicant is fit.
12. Title 38, U.S. Code, sections 1110 and 1131, permit the VA to award compensation for disabilities which were incurred in or aggravated by active military service. An Army disability rating is intended to compensate an individual for interruption of a military career after it has been determined that the individual suffers from an impairment that disqualifies him or her from further military service. The VA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affect the individuals civilian employability. The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request for correction of his records to show he was medically retired by reason of permanent disability was carefully considered; however, it is not supported by the evidence of record.
2. A copy of an NCOER reveals that the applicant was issued a medical profile as of 20 November 2007. The type of profile issued is not available for review; however, the rater made an indication that the applicant's profile did not hinder his ability to perform his military duties.
3. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he voluntarily separated and was given an RE code of "1," indicating he was fully qualified to reenter the military. There is no indication he was considered unfit for continued service.
4. The applicant provided a copy of his VA Rating Decision, dated 25 July 2008, which shows he was awarded a combined rating of 50 percent for his service-connected disabilities.
5. In accordance with governing laws, the VA is the Department responsible for compensating veterans when service-related conditions cause social or industrial impairment after a Soldier's discharge. Any rating action by the VA does not necessarily demonstrate error or injustice on the part of the Army. The Army must find a member physically unfit before he can be medically retired or separated. A thorough review of the available records failed to reveal, that the Army, in its discretion, found the applicant medically unfit for duty.
6. The applicant has submitted neither probative evidence nor a convincing argument in support of his request. In view of the foregoing, the applicant is not entitled to the requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X____ _____X___ _____X___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100010466
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100010466
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018568
His Enlisted Record Brief, dated 27 March 2012, shows his physical profile was 121111. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical fitness), chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015598
The applicant did not provide any evidence which shows that any of the conditions for which the VA awarded him disability compensation affected his ability to perform his military duties. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 3 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals involuntarily discharged at the completion of required active service. While it is clear that the applicant was retained beyond his ETS in order to receive medical care, there is no evidence...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017074
He provides: * Orders 13-119-00032, dated 29 April 2013 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) * DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 28 November 2012 * Numerous medical records * Numerous VA documents * Excerpts from Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual's medical...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009111
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and separation orders to show he was medically retired from active duty by reason of a permanent physical disability. His separation was not processed as a medical disability separation. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge that disqualify the Soldier from further military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015025
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: The applicant defers to counsel. Counsel requests the applicant's case be considered by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). Counsel states: a. the applicant did not meet retention standards while on active duty but he was not placed in the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES).
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020732
The applicant provides: * Service personnel records * Deployment reports * Service medical records * DVA records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His reenlistment eligibility worksheet, dated 18 September 2006, states he is currently on profile, he started his physical but needs medical records from DVA to complete, and that Military Occupational Specialty Medical Retention Board (MMRB) processing was initiated for his injury. Army Regulation 135-178 (Separation of Enlisted Personnel)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000558
A DA Form 2807-1 (Report of Medical History) and a DA Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), showing a date of examination of 27 November 2006 and dated 8 January 2007, show he underwent a medical examination at MacDill Air Force Base for the purpose of a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). His record is void of any evidence that shows an MEB was convened, the condition(s) the board considered, and/or the board's recommendation. Consequently, the applicant's medical conditions, although...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016931
The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Service medical records * VA medical records CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical fitness), chapter 7 (Physical Profiling) provides that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003750
Soldiers on active duty orders not in support of the GWOT might be eligible for an Active Duty Medical Extension. The applicant was voluntarily separated at ETS for completion of required active service. Even if the applicant had been evaluated by the Army for his left knee condition, he would not have been medically retired based on a 10 percent disability rating.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040005452C070208
At the formal hearing it was established that there was no medical evidence, by testing or physical examination, which showed instability of the knees. The VA, which has neither the authority, nor the responsibility for determining physical fitness for military service, awards disability ratings to veterans for conditions that it determines were incurred during military service and subsequently affect the individual’s civilian employability. The Army must find a member physically unfit...