Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010274
Original file (20100010274.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    9 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010274 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of Block 14 (Military Education) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC) phases 1 and 2.

2.  The applicant states he has five DD Forms 214 and only one lists military education.

3.  The applicant provided copies of his DD Form 214 and Service School Academic Reports (DA Form 1059's) for both phases.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.


2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 14 August 1984.  Records show he completed the training requirements and he was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).  The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was sergeant SGT/E5.

3.  He was honorably separated on 24 February 1992.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 7 years, 6 months, and 11 days of creditable active service.

4.  He subsequently enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 
25 February 1992.  The following DD Forms 214 indicate he served in an Active Duty Special Work (ADSW) status during the following periods:

* 18 March 1996 through 26 September 1996
*  9 October 1996 through 9 April 1997
*  5 February 2003 through 31 December 2003
*  9 January 2004 through 29 December 2004

5.  The applicant's records show he completed ANCOC phase 1 on 26 April 2001 and phase 2 on 30 May 2001.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the policies and procedures for the preparation and issuance of separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It states the DD Form 214 is prepared for all Soldiers at the time of their discharge, retirement, or release from the Active Army.  Block 14 states to list formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214.  Include title, length in weeks, and year completed.  This information is to assist the Soldier in job placement and counseling; therefore, do not list training courses for combat skills.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he completed ANCOC phases 1 and 2 was carefully considered.

2.  The applicant's records show he completed both phases of ANCOC; however, these courses were not completed during a period when he was on active duty.  As a result, the DD Forms 214 are correct as currently constituted. 



3.  Based on the forgoing there is insufficient evidence to support the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X___   ___
      ```	         CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010274



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010575

    Original file (20080010575.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214, dated 23 December 2004, be corrected to reflect his attendance at the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC), his award of the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) and all other awards that were reflected on his DD Form 214, dated 20 June 2001. The applicant provides copies of his award of the MSM, his completion of the ANCOC, and of his DD Forms 214. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013107

    Original file (20140013107.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct record of military service and all of his military education. The applicant contends his 31 March 1992 DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered AD on 5 October 1971, his correct net active service during this period, and all of his military education. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, there is no basis to correct item 12 (blocks a through e) of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069175C070402

    Original file (2002069175C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In effect, that he was administratively reduced by a US Army Reserve (USAR) Army Guard/Reserve (AGR) Enlisted Reduction Panel for failing to meet the conditions of his promotion to SFC. It states, in pertinent part, that when a soldier fails to complete a required NCOES course, the soldier's name will be removed from a promotion list, and if conditionally promoted, the soldier will be reduced in accordance with paragraph 7-12d. The applicant stated that his condition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005409

    Original file (20140005409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He served in Saudi Arabia from 13 January 1991 to 16 May 1991 as a food service specialist and was released from active duty on 11 June 1991. The applicant has not provided and the record contains no evidence to show that the applicant was recommended or considered for promotion to sergeant first class. The applicant met all requirements for promotion consideration to SFC at the time he was mobilized in 1990 except he had not completed either BNCOC or ANCOC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012091

    Original file (20110012091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. the Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) awarded him in January 1999 should be added to item 13 of his DD Form 214; b. the following entries should be added to item 14 of his DD Form 214: * Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Training (December 1997) * Advanced Techniques in Evidence and Property Management (April 1997) * Interview and Interrogations (August 1997) * Military Police Advanced Noncommissioned Officer's Course (ANCOC) (June 1996) * Managing Criminal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018293

    Original file (20080018293.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was reduced from E-7 back to E-6 for not completing the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC) Phase II in time even though he had physical problems. His effort to complete ANCOC is evident by the completion of ANCOC Phase I a second time, even after the reduction and suspension of his conditional promotion effective in January 2003. There is no evidence of record which indicates he completed ANCOC Phase II.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082572C070215

    Original file (2002082572C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It provides, in pertinent part, that effective 1 October 1993, soldiers whose sequence numbers are reached for promotion to the pay grade of E-7 and have not completed or attended ANCOC are promoted conditional upon their completion of ANCOC (provided they are not a previous ANCOC failure). The applicant was originally conditionally promoted to the pay grade of E-7 in 1995 and after failing the ANCOC (academically), he was reduced back to the pay grade of E-6 on 3 December 1996. Although...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002069394C070402

    Original file (2002069394C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    If the grade requires the soldier to be a graduate of ANCOC, the soldier must be enrolled in the course within 12 months of the date of promotion and be a graduate of ANCOC within 24 months of the Phase I completion date. The applicant was scheduled for ANCOC, was on a temporary profile, and his recovery period of his profile overlapped with the course report date. a. by showing that he was granted an authorized delay for NCOES requirements of his conditional promotion and medical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016175C070206

    Original file (20050016175C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that the information contained on the DD Form 214 will apply only to the period of service covered by the DD Form 214, unless otherwise specified, and that only those specialties that have been awarded in accordance with Army Regulation 611- 201 and that have been held for at least 1 year, are authorized for entry on the DD Form 214. In accordance with the applicable regulation, the USAR service that was completed after the period covered should not be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019784

    Original file (20090019784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was promoted to SFC on 1 January 2004 * he completed Phase I of the Advanced Noncommissioned Officer Course (ANCOC) on 6 June 2004, but he could not attend Phase II of ANCOC at that time due to certain medical conditions * he took a voluntary reduction in grade effective 9 August 2004 and was transferred to his detachment * he feels he would have retired at the highest grade held except for medical reasons beyond his control 3. On 31 August 2006, the applicant...