Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010169
Original file (20100010169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  8 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010169


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and an unspecified "combat award."

2.  The applicant states he was in combat as a tank gunner and received a shrapnel wound to his right upper chest just below his armpit.  He needs proof that he was in combat to qualify for Department of Veterans Affairs benefits as well as for personal/family reasons.

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's service medical and dental records are believed to be on permanent loan to the Department of Veterans Affairs and are not available for review.

3.  The applicant, a retired U.S. Army Reserve staff sergeant, enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 March 1964, completed training, and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 131.00 (Armor Crewman).

4.  He reenlisted on 22 April 1965 and served two tours of duty in Vietnam.  The record does not contain any specific information as to what units he served with or the complete dates or duration of his service in Vietnam.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 12 April 1968 shows that at some point during his enlistment, he reclassified to MOS 94B (Cook).

6.  The available records do not contain any indication that the applicant was authorized, recommended for, or received any award that could be considered a combat award.  Nor is there any evidence that he sustained any combat-related wounds.

7.  A review of the Vietnam casualty list failed to locate any reference to the applicant.

8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for any awards for the applicant.

9.  U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War.  It states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he served in combat as a tank gunner and received a shrapnel wound to his right upper chest.  Based on this, he believes he is entitled to the Purple Heart and a combat award.

2.  The applicant's records contain no documentation to support his contention that he received a wound as the result of hostile action.  Without a record of treatment for a wound sustained as the result of enemy action, entitlement to the Purple Heart cannot be established.

3.  His records contain no documentation to support his contention that he was recommended for, authorized, or awarded any award that could be considered a combat award.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007352



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010169



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9510578C070209

    Original file (9510578C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his military records to reflect award of the Purple Heart and Combat Medical Badge. The physician stated that in December 1966, “while carrying a litter” he asked him about a limp and noticed “he was bleeding from his right leg.” The statement goes on to note “as I recall checking him [the applicant] I located shrapnel in his right leg, right side of waist, and the left upper section of his chest.” PURPOSE: To determine whether the application was submitted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03099782C070212

    Original file (03099782C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Although the applicant’s name may not be reflected among the list of individuals reported as combat casualties during the Vietnam War, based on the typed wound entry on his Department of the Army Form 20, the subsequent medical treatment document which mention the shrapnel wound, and the fact that the wound was also recorded on his separation document, there is sufficient evidence to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013296

    Original file (20090013296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records revealed that there are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's military personnel records do not contain any evidence that the applicant provided the information requested. The applicant provides no timely documentary evidence from his service medical records to verify that he was wounded as the result of hostile action, that such wound required treatment by medical personnel, or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024494

    Original file (20100024494.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Combat Infantryman Badge. Item 27 (Military Schools) shows he successfully completed the 8-week Cook course and he was awarded MOS 94B in 1967. c. Item 31 (Foreign Service) shows he served an overseas tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 January 1968 through 23 January 1969. d. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001981

    Original file (20090001981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA's Compensation and Pension Exam Hospital Summary shows that on 26 March 1969, the applicant was admitted with a chief complaint of pain at left ankle area where he had an old gunshot wound. The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. There are no medical records available which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action during his service in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006972C070206

    Original file (20050006972C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an effective date of 7 July 1971 does not show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's military service records do not contain any general orders awarding him the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows award of the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022864

    Original file (20100022864.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A self-authored statement, dated 21 October 2009, wherein he states he served as the platoon sergeant of the 1st Platoon, C Troop. d. An undated statement from another former member (tank gunner) of the applicant's platoon wherein he states on or around 20 August 1968, they were returning from a mine sweep mission to QTC when their tank hit a bomb that damaged the right front of the tank. Notwithstanding the applicant's sincerity and the sincerity of his former platoon members, in the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005660

    Original file (20110005660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Meritorious Service Medal, Wound Chevrons, and Purple Heart. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Based on the available evidence he is not authorized award of the Purple Heart and his request should be denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012856

    Original file (20110012856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his military records to show award of the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The VA Rating Decision provided by the applicant is new evidence that should be considered by the Board. The original Record of Proceedings states: a. the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded; b. there was an absence of evidence showing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014610

    Original file (20110014610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he served on active duty in the U.S. Army from 3 April 1969 through 2 April 1971 * on 2 February 1970, he incurred and was later diagnosed with residual shell fragment wound, left leg, left foot, left side, and right thigh * his wounds were the result of a fragmentation hand grenade exploding also injuring another Soldier * he received medical treatment at the local medical hospital and he was presented the Purple Heart by a captain assigned to the...