Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010156
Original file (20100010156.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 November 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100010156 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests her military records be corrected by canceling her Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election for spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states her spouse filled out all the paperwork, indicated he did not want SBP, and he faxed the paperwork back to the retirement section.  However, the paperwork faxed to the Fort Carson, Colorado office was not used.  She contends her spouse spoke to the personnel about his desire and the paperwork was sent out accordingly and then faxed back to them.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 25 August 2010
* Retiree Account Statement, dated 1 October 2010

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant retired effective 1 August 2007 in the rank of staff sergeant/pay grade E-6. 

2.  The available records do not contain a DD Form 2656.



3.  Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records show they never received an SBP election from the applicant.  Her current SBP election is automatic with full coverage, the default election when a valid election is not received. 

4.  In support of her claim, the applicant provided a DD Form 2656, dated 
25 August 2010, which shows she elected not to participate in the SBP and that she did not have eligible dependents under the plan.  Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence (required when member is married and elects children only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage)) of this form is blank.

5.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  

6.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse's written concurrence for a retiring member's election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It appears the applicant was automatically enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage since she did not make an SBP election prior to her retirement in 2007.  

2.  The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, there is no evidence and the applicant provided no evidence which shows her spouse concurred with her election to decline SBP.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicantÂ’s request.   

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION




BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010156





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100010156



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017092

    Original file (20110017092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests her records be corrected to show she declined participation in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and that she receive a refund for all SBP premiums taken from her retired pay. She provides: * Certified mail receipt * Letter addressed to DFAS * Standard Form 1199A (Direct Deposit) * DD Form 108 (Application for Retired Pay Benefits) * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * Retiree Account Statement * Letter from DFAS, Retired and Annuity Pay * ARPC Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050012181C070206

    Original file (20050012181C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DFAS Summary of Retired Pay Account dated 18 November 2004 indicates DFAS did not receive her SBP election and therefore she was provided automatic SBP coverage effective 1 November 2004. The Separations and Retirement Section, Fort Belvoir, VA provided DFAS a DD Form 2656 which indicated the applicant had declined to participate in the SBP on 28 October 2004. Nevertheless, the evidence shows the applicant's spouse did concur with her election not to participate in the SBP.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001471

    Original file (20140001471.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides a Spouse SBP Election Concurrence Statement. After he retired, on 30 August 2013, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656 and elected not to participate in the SBP. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 2656 to show he and his spouse timely signed the form declining to participate in the SBP and the form was properly notarized; b. showing DFAS timely received and processed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012530

    Original file (20110012530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * SBP Spouse Election Concurrence Statement * Retiree Account Statement CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's Retiree Account Statement, dated 9 March 2011 (effective 1 April 2011), shows an SBP deduction for spouse coverage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016266

    Original file (20110016266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An SBP election must be made prior to the effective date of retirement or the SBP will, by law, default to automatic SBP spouse coverage (if married). However, the evidence also shows that both the applicant and her spouse signed a subsequent form declining coverage prior to the effective date of her retirement and the form was duly notarized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing her duly-notarized...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019169

    Original file (20080019169.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that her records be corrected to show she elected, with her spouse's concurrence, not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and reimbursement of SBP premiums deducted from her retired pay. Evidence of record shows that the applicant declined SBP coverage on 12 May 2008. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the applicant's spouse concurred with her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021185

    Original file (20110021185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 2 March 2011 * SBP Spouse Election Concurrence Statement, dated 8 March 2011 * Retiree Account Statement, dated 29 September 2011 * letter of explanation/correction request, dated 14 October 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. By law, his spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date he made this election but prior to the date of retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019508

    Original file (20110019508.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She submits the following documents in support of her application: a. a DD Form 2656, dated 4 May 2011, which shows she elected "children only" coverage, full amount, and indicated she had a spouse; however, this document does not show spousal concurrence and is not notarized; b. a Retiree Account Summary which shows deductions for "spouse only" coverage; and c. a notarized letter, dated 1 May 2012, signed by the applicant and her spouse in which the spouse confirms it was his original...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014707

    Original file (20090014707.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This letter notified the applicant that she had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. The evidence of record also shows she submitted a DD Form 2656 on 25 February 2009 wherein she elected, in the presence of an RSO counselor, not to participate in the SBP. However, by law, her spouse was required to authenticate this form on or after the date she made this election but prior to the date of retirement.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016366

    Original file (20100016366.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that subsequent to receiving her 20-year letter, the applicant elected Option A wherein she declined enrollment at that time and deferred her SBP election to age 60. The evidence of record shows she retired on 6 May 2010, at age 60. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form 2656 on 30 March 2010 electing not to participate in...