Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009989
Original file (20100009989.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009989 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the grandson of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests his grandfather be awarded the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with one bronze service star for the Leyte campaign.

2.  The applicant states that documents provided by the Center for Military History shows that his grandfather's unit was sent to the Philippines.  The Philippine Presidential Unit Citation lists his grandfather's unit as a recipient.

3.  The applicant provides copies of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), an extract from DA Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Credit Register), and Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 47, dated 28 December 1950.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The FSM's military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that his records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, sufficient information is available to render a full and impartial review.

3.  The FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and he served on active duty from 10 June 1942 to 20 December 1945.  He was honorably discharged as a Technician 3rd Class.  He was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, World War II Victory Medal, and the American Theater Campaign Medal.

4.  Item 56 (Service Outside Continental U.S. and Return) of the WD AGO Form 53-55 shows the following single entry:

	Date of Departure			Destination					Date of Arrival
	  11 Sep 45					American Theatre			15 Sep 45

5.  The WD AGO Form 53-55 shows in item 6 that the FSM's organization was the 3114th Signal Service Battalion.

6.  Item 8 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 and the FSM's WD Form 370 (Final [Pay] Statement) show that he was discharged at Fort Gulick, Canal Zone on 20 December 1945.

7.  DA Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Credit Register) does not list the 3114th Signal Service Battalion.

8.  DAGO 47, dated 28 December 1950 authorizes listed units and personnel assigned and present for duty with these units to receive the Philippine Presidential Unit Citation for the period 17 October 1944 to 4 July 1945.

9.  The applicant has highlighted the 3114th Signal Service Platoon (emphasis added) as the recipient of the Philippine Presidential Unit Citation and campaign credit for Leyte on the copies of DAGO Number 47 and the DA Pamphlet 672-1 that he submitted.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states that documents provided by the Center for Military History shows that his grandfather's unit was sent to the Philippines.  The Philippine Presidential Unit Citation lists his grandfather's unit as a recipient.

2.  The documents provided by the applicant show the 3114th Signal Service Platoon, not the FSM's unit, the 3114th Signal Service Battalion, received the Philippine Presidential Unit Citation and campaign credit for Leyte.

3.  The FSM's discharge at Fort Gulick in the former Panama Canal Zone could very well account for the seemingly incomplete entry in item 36 of the WD AGO 53-55.  Knowing the FSM served at the Fort Gulick makes this 4-day sea voyage from 11-15 September 1945, which started and ended in the American Theater of Operations, completely reasonable. 

4.  In view of the foregoing, regrettably, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009989



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009989



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003228

    Original file (20110003228.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 31 (Military Qualification and Date) of the FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was awarded the CIB. Therefore, the FSM is entitled to the Philippine Presidential Unit Citation and correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 the Distinguished Unit Badge and the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with 2 bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022829

    Original file (20120022829.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available for review. This pamphlet shows the 383d Infantry Regiment participated in the Leyte (i.e., Phillipines) and Ryukyus (i.e., Okinawa) Campaigns and was: * awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for actions during the period 20 October 1944 through 20 June 1945 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 656, dated 29 August 1945 * credited with an assault landing at Leyte from 20-23 October 1944 by DAGO Number 109, dated 1946 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003069

    Original file (20080003069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards, campaign, and assault credits received by units serving during World War II. By letter dated 9 June 2005, the National Personnel Records Center informed the applicant he would be sent a number of awards; however, a bronze service star for the Philippine Liberation Ribbon was not listed as one of those awards/appurtenances. Based on the authorized campaigns of New Guinea,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082394C070215

    Original file (2002082394C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the applicant's contention that he served in Luzon and Leyte. Therefore, his records will be corrected to show this unit award. That so much of the application as it relates to correction of his records to show the Leyte campaign be denied.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018336

    Original file (20140018336.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55 and copies of: * General Orders (GO) Number 86, issued by Headquarters, Americal Division on 10 June 1945 * his Bronze Star Medal Citation, dated 10 June 1945 * a letter from the War Department, The Adjutant General's Office, dated 20 December 1945 * two letters from the Army Service Forces, Headquarters, First Service Command, dated 13 March 1946 and 28 March 1946 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows that during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062127C070421

    Original file (2001062127C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Philippine Defense Ribbon and the Philippine Independence Ribbon. APPLICANT STATES : That his unit, the 226th Field Artillery (FA) Battalion (Bn), was part of the XXIV Corps during the Leyte Campaign. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065580C070421

    Original file (2001065580C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, on behalf of his late father, the former service member (FSM), that he be awarded a bronze star to his Philippine Liberation Medal, for the battle of Leyte, an arrowhead device to his Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal, for the assault landing at Angaur and the Combat Infantryman Badge because of his face-to-face combat with the enemy during World War II. Finally, he believes that the FSM is entitled to the Combat Infantryman Badge because he fought in combat as a member...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007641

    Original file (20080007641.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, award of the Combat Medical Badge, the battles and campaigns in which he participated, an additional military occupational specialty (MOS), and the immunizations that he received. Although he performed the duties of a Litter Bearer (657) for 12 months and served as a General Clerk (055) in a battalion aid station where his duties included maintaining various records, the available records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082978C070215

    Original file (2002082978C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his discharge document does not show all the battles and campaigns to which he is entitled. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides, in pertinent part, that the Army of Occupation Medal is awarded for service of thirty consecutive days at a normal post of duty in a qualifying location. The Board noted that the applicant is eligible for award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan clasp (based on award of the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal prior to 3 September 1945...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080059C070215

    Original file (2002080059C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, the Purple Heart, the Good Conduct Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with two bronze service stars and two arrowheads, the World War II Victory Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Presidential Unit Citation (known as the Distinguished Unit Citation until 3 November 1966). The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 does not show the...