Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009465
Original file (20100009465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  7 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009465 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he was a private (PV2)/E-2 instead of a private (PV1)/E-1 at the time of enlistment and college benefits in the amount rewarded.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he entered the Army in June 1982 under the Delayed Entry Program (DEP) as an E-2 because he brought another person in with him, but his records show him as an E-1.  He was never compensated for the college benefits ($10,000.00) he was promised.

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Army Regulation 15–185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  Paragraph 2-8 states that the ABCMR staff will review each application to determine if it meets the criteria for consideration by the ABCMR.  The application may be returned without action if the applicant has not exhausted all other administrative remedies or it does not have jurisdiction to grant the requested relief

3.  The issue of receipt of or reimbursement for educational benefits is under the jurisdiction of the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA).  The ABCMR does not have jurisdiction over such issues; therefore, this portion of the applicant's request will not be discussed further in these Proceedings.

4.  On 18 June 1981, the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) pay grade E-1 under the DEP.  His DD Form4/1 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document - Armed Forces of the United States) states, "The agreements in this section and the attached annex(es) are all the promises made to me by the Government.  ANYTHING ELSE ANYONE HAS PROMISED ME IS NOT VALID AND WILL NOT BY HONORED."   His enlistment contract contains no indication of entitlement to entry at a higher pay grade or college benefits.

5.  On 10 June 1982, he was discharged from the USAR DEP and he enlisted in the Regular Army as an E-1 on 11 June 1982.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 12B (Combat Engineer).

6.  The applicant was advanced to E-2, effective 10 December 1982.

7.  The available record contains no documentation related to the applicant's separation other than it was for a physical disability rated as 10 percent disabling.

8.  The applicant DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he was discharged on 7 June 1983 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), paragraph 4-24e(3), by reason of physical disability with severance pay), in pay grade E-2.  He completed 11 months and 27 days of total active service.

9.  Army Regulation 15–185, paragraph 2-9, states that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states he enlisted in the Army as an E-2 because he brought another person in as well, but he was not paid as an E-2.

2.  He was advanced to pay grade E-2 on 10 December 1982.  The record does not contain and the applicant has not provided any evidence to support his contention that he was entitled to an earlier date of advancement to E-2.

3.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009465



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR201000094

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015726

    Original file (20090015726.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When discussing his enlistment with his recruiter, he submitted copies of his college diplomas and transcripts to his recruiter who forwarded the documents to the University of Iowa for evaluation. Item 35 (Remarks) of the applicant’s DD Form 1966/4 (Record of Military Processing), dated 25 July 2008, shows the applicant was authorized an enlistment grade of private (PV2)/E-2 in accordance with paragraph 2-18 of AR 601-210. c. Paragraph 2-7 (Foreign Credentials), applicants completing high...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007137

    Original file (20070007137.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show his rank as private/pay grade E-2, payment for the time he spent in the DEP, and payment of his MOS bonus. There is no evidence in the applicant's records to show he was promoted to the rank/pay grade E-2 between the time he was reduced and the time he was separated. Evidence of record shows that the applicant did not enlist under a program that authorized the payment of an enlistment bonus.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015042

    Original file (20060015042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show his rank as private, pay grade E2. The applicant states that he was a private, pay grade E2 at the time of his separation, and was promised payment for his time in the DEP and an enlistment bonus check. He was separated in the rank of private, pay grade E1, and had completed only 2 years and 24 days of his 3 year obligation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004954

    Original file (20090004954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 1 (Acknowledgement) of his DA Form 3286-59/1 (Statement for Enlistment, U.S. Army Enlistment Option, U.S. Army Delayed Enlistment Program), dated 8 December 1987, shows the entry “Upon enlistment in the Regular Army, I will be enlisted under the provisions of Army Regulation 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program), Option 9-3, U.S. Army Training of Choice Enlistment Option” and “If enlisting for an Army school course I have been assured of attending the school course...

  • CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2008-124

    Original file (2008-124.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The JAG admitted that the record “does document that Applicant was advised in an Annex “T” form (CG-3301T) dated 13 May 2007, that he was eligible for a $6,000 enlistment bonus for college credit.” However, the JAG alleged, the Annex “T” was “invalid, erroneous, and unauthorized” because Article 3.A.2.3. 2005-117, the applicant stated that he was promised a $4,000 SELRES enlistment bonus by his recruiter. Although the JAG recommended only that the Board make the contract voidable, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019054

    Original file (20130019054.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was promised by the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College (CGSC) Adjunct Faculty that his retirement orders would be adjusted in order to continue grading papers for the old CGSC course and earn additional retirements points beyond his MRD as the new CSGC course was being phased in. He was not attached to CGSC per Army Regulation 140-10, paragraph 3-7 to complete IDT duty of grading papers. He completed 28 years of commissioned service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001029C070205

    Original file (20060001029C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 2 April 1981, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, UCMJ for failing to go to his appointed place of duty. The applicant was discharged 24 June 1982 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service with a discharge UOTHC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000331

    Original file (20120000331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement – Armed Forces of the United States), section II (Agreements), dated 8 May 1979, shows: * "reenlisted for Army Service School/Army Training Center Option" * "no waiver" * "SRB [selective reenlistment bonus]: 0" * "RCN [reenlistment control number]: 850684" * "67V1O Observation/Scout Helicopter Repairer (D67V)" b. The advisory opinion stated the applicant enlisted in the Army on 8 May 1979 for MOS 67V as a prior-service applicant. There is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008624

    Original file (20120008624.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He stated, in part: "At the time of my enlistment my recruiter told me not to mention any criminal charges. The Acting Chief stated it appeared the applicant had fraudulently enlisted, and he recommended action be taken in accordance with Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004993

    Original file (20090004993.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) Letter, dated 17 August 2007; College Transcripts, dated 12 May 1984; Retirement Memorandum, dated 13 August 2005; DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Date); SGLV Form 8286 (Service Member’s Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate); DD Form 1299 (Application for Shipment and/or...