Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009394
Original file (20100009394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  26 October 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR2010009394 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for a medical discharge/retirement.

2.  The applicant states he was serving on active duty when he suffered an injury on 17 July 1990.  Further, he is entitled to benefits under Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 1223 (Retired Pay for Non-Regular Service).

3.  The applicant provides the following documents in support of this application which were not previously seen by the Board:

* Standard Form 600 (Chronological Record of Medical Care), undated
* DA Form 3349 (Medical Condition - Physical Profile Records), dated 7 April 1980
* Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 3 June 1983 
* multiple pages of progress notes, dated 14 September 2009 through 5 November 2009
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision, dated 14 July 2009

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20090003423 on 23 June 2009.

2.  The applicant provided new arguments and new evidence which merit consideration by the Board.

3.  The previous ABCMR decision granted him the following partial relief:

	a.  determined he was medically disqualified for retention in the Selected Reserve as a result of a non-duty related injury rather than for the injury he suffered in July 1990,

	b.  entitled him to retired pay at age 60 under Public Law 102-484, and

	c.  issued him a 15-year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60 along with the appropriate Survivor Benefits Plan election form.

4.  The previous ABCMR decision denied his request for a discharge based on physical unfitness because it appeared his medical disqualification was from a condition which existed prior to his entry on active duty rather than from his July 1990 injury, which made his medical disqualification non-duty related.

5.  There were partial medical records available for review and those records show:

	a.  His commander found the injury he sustained on 17 July 1990 was in the line of duty.

	b.  He was hospitalized at the VA Hospital from 20 July 1990 to 26 July 1990 and diagnosed with an L-4 compression fracture with pedicle [the stem that attaches a new growth] due to back trauma.

	c.  On 5 October 1990, he was released from active duty and assigned to Headquarters, 7581st U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Garrison, Fort Buchanan, Puerto Rico.

	d.  Headquarters, Fort McPherson, Permanent Orders Number 297-012, dated 24 October 1990, reassigned him to Headquarters Company, U.S. Army Garrison, for evaluation by a military occupational specialty medical retention board.

	e.  Headquarters, Fort McPherson, Orders 319-18, dated 15 November 1990, released him from active duty effective 16 November 1990 and referred him to a mandatory medical review board.

	f.  His Standard Form 88, dated 15 December 1990, shows the purpose for the examination was a board.  The evaluating physician recommended a board evaluation and ears, nose, throat, and orthopedic examinations.  The applicant was found "not qualified for (word unknown) completed orthopedic evaluation."

	g.  On 13 July 1991, the command surgeon found that the applicant had long-standing low back pain dating back to 1976, was overweight, and suffered an L-4 fracture in July 1990, and that the orthopedic evaluation done during mobilization found him fit for duty with a temporary physical profile.

	h.  The command surgeon recommended that the applicant be referred to the Active Component for orthopedic evaluation of the L-4 injury and a final recommendation and that he seriously be considered for separation from service and transferred to the Standby Reserve on the Active Status List for a period of 1 year to allow sufficient time for evaluation by the USAR Personnel Center Surgeon.

	i.  On 6 May 1992, a physical review board found him qualified for retention in the USAR.

6.  A memorandum, 311th Quartermaster Company, dated 13 May 1993, subject: Unsatisfactory Participation stated the applicant requested and was granted a waiver to stay in the USAR; however, due to his continued health problems and a 
60-percent disability rating from the VA, he was declared non-deployable by the USAR.  The applicant requested a discharge due to his medical unfitness.

7.  Effective 28 May 1993, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.

8.  As a result of an Inspector General inquiry, the 65th USAR Command Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel determined the discharge orders should be revoked because the applicant had not understood his options and had elected to be discharged rather than transferred to the Retired Reserve.

9.  He was required to sign and date corrected option letters (English and Spanish) acknowledging his transfer to the Retired Reserve.

10.  On 9 February 1994, Headquarters, USAR Command, Permanent Orders 94-088-068 assigned him to the Retired Reserve based on his mandatory removal due to being medically disqualified for retention.

11.  Army Regulation 135-178 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Separation of Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 12-1 (Medically Unfit for Retention), states that Reserve enlisted Soldiers who are no longer qualified for retention by reason of medical unfitness under the standards of Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 3 (Medical Fitness Standards for Retention and Separation Including Retirement), will be discharged unless they are granted a waiver of the medical disqualification or are eligible and request transfer to the Retired Reserve under the provisions of Army Regulation 140-10 (Army Reserve Assignments, Attachments, Details, and Transfers), 
paragraph 6-1 (Eligibility).

12.  Army Regulation 635-40 provides that the medical treatment facility commander with the primary care responsibility will evaluate those referred to him and will, if it appears as though the member is not medically qualified to perform duty or fails to meet retention criteria, refer the member to a medical evaluation board.  Those members who do not meet medical retention standards will be referred to a physical evaluation board for a determination of whether they are able to perform the duties of their grade and military specialty with the medically-disqualifying condition.

13.  Army Regulation 635-40 states that under the laws governing the Army Physical Disability Evaluation system, Soldiers who sustain or aggravate physically unfitting disabilities must meet several line of duty criteria to be eligible to receive retirement and severance pay benefits.  One of the criteria is that the disability must have been incurred or aggravated while the Soldier was entitled to basic pay or was the proximate cause of performing active duty or inactive duty training.

14.  Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides disability retirement or separation for a member who is physically unfit to perform the duties of his or her office, rank, grade, or rating because of a disability incurred while entitled to basic pay.

15.  Public Law 106-65, added section 12731b (Special Rule for Members with Physical Disabilities Not Incurred in the Line of Duty) and made permanent  an earlier law that states a member of the Selected Reserve who no longer meets the qualifications for membership in the Selected Reserve solely because the member is unfit because of physical disability may, for the purpose s of section 12731 (Age and Service Requirements) of this title, be treated as having met the service requirements and be provided with the notification required if he or she has completed at least 15 and less than 20 years of service.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for a medical discharge/retirement because he was serving on active duty when his injury occurred.
2.  The evidence of record confirms he was serving on active duty when he sustained a back injury on 17 July 1990.  However, the evidence of record also shows that he had a history of back problems going back to 1976.

3.   On 9 February 1994, Headquarters, USAR Command, Permanent Orders  94-088-068 assigned him to the Retired Reserve based on medical disqualification for retention with an effective date of discharge of 28 May 1993.

4.  On 23 June 2009, the ABCMR determined his medical disqualification was non-duty related and corrected his record to show he was entitled to retired pay at age 60 under Public Law 102-484 and issued him a 15-year letter certifying his eligibility for retired pay at age 60.  

5.  There is no available evidence to show that the injury he sustained on 17 July 1990, as opposed to his long history of back problems, resulted in his medical disqualification which occurred on 28 May 1993.  Lacking evidence to the contrary, and in view of the foregoing, his request for medical retirement based on physical unfitness should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  _____X___  _____X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 
are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090003423, dated 23 June 2009.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003423



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009394



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003423

    Original file (20090003423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his transfer to the Retired Reserve due to medical disqualification be corrected to a discharge for physical unfitness. Notwithstanding the USAR Personnel Command's determination that the applicant's medical disqualification was duty related, the preponderance of evidence shows that it was not. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was found medically disqualified...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001291

    Original file (20150001291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 61, provides the Secretaries of the Military Departments with authority to retire or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015402

    Original file (20080015402.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 635-40 governs the evaluation for physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability. Consequently, due to the two concepts involved, an individual’s medical condition may not be considered to be a physical disability by the Army and yet be rated by the DVA as a disability. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007773

    Original file (20140007773.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was released from active duty on 10 April 2004. On 9 April 2005, he was transferred to the Retired Reserve due to medical disqualification for retention. Basically, members with conditions as severe as listed in this chapter are considered medically unfit for retention on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000537

    Original file (20090000537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 August 2008, a MEB convened at Fort Leonard Wood, MO, and after consideration of clinical records, laboratory findings, and physical examinations, the MEB found the applicant’s medical conditions of cervical spine pain, low back pain, and bilateral planter fasciitis rendered him unable to fulfill the requirements of his grade and MOS. The PEB also determined that the applicant’s disability was not combat-related. The PEB determined that the applicant's disabling conditions were those...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011876

    Original file (20100011876.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was honorably discharged for medical reasons. The applicant provides: * DD Form 785 (Record of Enrollment from Officer Candidate - Type Training) * Form 214 * Line of Duty Determination * Physical Disability Separation Memorandum * U.S. Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) discharge orders * DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) * Administrative relief from training memorandum * Orders releasing him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016889

    Original file (20110016889.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) governs the evaluation of physical fitness of Soldiers who may be unfit to perform their military duties because of physical disability incurred while entitled to basic pay. a. Paragraph 15-1k states discharge will be accomplished when it has been determined that a Soldier is no longer qualified for retention by...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015968

    Original file (20090015968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His medical conditions developed during his period of service and were determined by Army Regulations (AR) and medical boards to be the reason for his disqualification for further service; therefore, he requests correction of the decision previously rendered in his case because the disqualifying conditions were not due to his own fault or misconduct. However, along with the notification, he would have been required to acknowledge the notification and elect one of the following options on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9506854C070209

    Original file (9506854C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    EVIDENCE OF RECORD: The applicant's military records show: He enlisted in the ARNG with no prior service on 14 January 1974, entered on his initial active duty for training on 4 June 1974, was awarded the military occupational specialty of supply specialist, and was honorably released from active duty and returned to his ARNG unit on 5 December 1974. The PEB recommended that the applicant be discharged with severance pay, rated 10 percent disabled, contingent on the applicant’s unfitting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005375

    Original file (20090005375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He contends that since he had completed 18 years of Reserve service and was medically disqualified from service, he qualified for immediate transfer to the Retired Reserve. The applicant's contention that his USAR discharge orders, dated 6 May 1992, should be revoked and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve under the Selected Reserve Transition Program Type-XM was carefully considered. Evidence of record shows the applicant elected to be discharged from the USAR on 30 September 1991.