Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009387
Original file (20100009387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 16 March 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009387 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, reissuance of his 1995 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he does not recall receiving a DD Form 214 when he was appointed as a warrant officer in 1995.  He states he does not have a copy, and officials in St. Louis do not have a copy.  He made an inquiry to Fort Rucker, Alabama where the DD Form 214 should have been issued and they failed to produce a copy.  The applicant states he never thought to look for this previously issued DD Form 214 until he was getting ready to retire from active Federal service.  He states he would like a DD Form 214 created for his
13 years of enlisted service.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his request.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Records available to the Board indicate the applicant initially enlisted in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) on 27 August 1981 under the Army’s delayed enlistment program (DEP).  On 29 December 1981, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army after 4 months and 2 days in the DEP.

2.  Following the applicant’s enlistment in the Regular Army, he continued to serve on active duty via a series of reenlistments until 10 April 1995.  By July 1992 he had attained the rank of Sergeant First Class.

3.  On 11 April 1995 the applicant accepted an appointment as a USAR warrant officer with concurrent call to active duty and continued to serve in an active duty status without a break in military service.  

4.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states that a DD Form 214 will be issued when an enlisted Soldier is discharged to continue on active duty as a commissioned or warrant officer.  The applicant’s OMPF (Official Military Personnel File) does not contain a copy of his DD Form 214.

5.  The above regulation also states that a DD Form 214 will not be issued to replace record copies of the DD Form 214 lost by Soldiers.  If no DD Form 214 is available, a statement of service or transcript of military record should be issued.

6.  In the applicant’s case, when he retires from active Federal service, his DD Form 214 will reflect the date he entered active duty as a warrant officer (11 April 1995).  Item 12d (total prior inactive service) will reflect 13 years, 3 months, and 12 days of prior active service as an enlisted Soldier.  Iitem 12e (total prior inactive service) will reflect 4 months and 2 days of service in the DEP.  Item 13 (decorations, medals, badges, citations and campaign ribbons awarded or authorized) will reflect his awards and decorations from all periods of service although item 14 (military education) will only reflect formal in-service training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the 
DD Form 214.  His military education that was completed while he was serving as an enlisted Soldier will not be captured on his retirement DD Form 214.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant should have been issued a DD Form 214 when he was discharged from active duty to accept his appointment as a warrant officer in April 1995.  

2.  In the applicant’s case, his period of service in the DEP and as an enlisted Soldier, as well as his awards and decorations from his entire period of military service, will be reflected on the DD Form 214 issued at the time of retirement.  The only information omitted from his retirement DD Form 214, which may have bearing on future employment, is any formal in-service training courses he may have completed while serving as an enlisted Soldier.  However, that information could be recorded as part of a transcript of military record which should be issued in lieu of the DD Form 214.



3.  Because the absence of a DD Form 214 from the applicant’s enlisted service is not conclusive evidence that a DD Form 214 was not issued at the time he was appointed as a warrant officer, the issuance of a transcript of military record is a viable and appropriate alternative to reissuing a DD Form 214 and essentially serves the same purpose.  This is particularly true in view of the fact that the applicant’s retirement DD Form 214 will appropriately capture the applicant’s entire period of military service in terms of years of service and awards and decorations.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____x____  ___x_____  ____x____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing a transcript of military records reflecting his military service as an enlisted Soldier between 27 August 1981 and 11 April 1995, including any formal 
in-service training courses he may have completed which would have been included on a DD Form 214 issued at the time of discharge for the purpose of accepting an appointment as a warrant officer.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to reissuing his 1995 DD Form 214.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009387



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009387



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001743

    Original file (20110001743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct date of entry as 6 May 1975 instead of 30 October 1978. The regulation states not to issue a DD Form 214 to replace record copies or DD Forms 214 lost by Soldiers. He completed 16 years, 7 months, and 1 day of creditable active service during the period covered by this DD Form 214: * item 12a of his DD Form 214 correctly reflects the entry "1978 10 30," the date...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020132

    Original file (20140020132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he served in an enlisted, warrant, and commissioned officer status; he did not receive a DD Form 214 for his warrant officer service * he served on active duty in a warrant officer status from 8 November 1966 to 6 November 1969; he completed a tour in Vietnam during this period * he did not receive credit for the tour in Vietnam because of the missing DD Form 214 * the previous case indicated that a DD Form 214 for this period is not available and is presumed it was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009340

    Original file (20090009340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record does not show the applicant completed any further active duty service beyond the 1 month and 2 days currently reflected on his DD Form 214 which is contained in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). However, the DD Form 214 contained in his records is the Service -2 copy of the original document issued to the applicant at the time of his separation on 24 August 1981. In additionally, had the applicant lost his DD Form 214 and requested a replacement he would have received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001489C070205

    Original file (20060001489C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve under the DEP on 16 May 1981 and was discharged on 8 September 1981, which is a period of 3 months and 23 days. Although there is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was issued a DD Form 214 for his period of active duty service from 9 September 1981 to 30 June 1983, he should have been issued one. As a result, the Board recommends that the DD Form 214 of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000428

    Original file (20150000428.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. By direction of the Army Board for Corrections of Military Records (ABCMR) or Army Discharge Review Board, or in other instances when appropriate, the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army, Army Review Boards Agency, is authorized to issue or reissue DD Forms 214. Once a DD Form 214 has been issued, it will not be reissued except under specified circumstances, including when it is determined that the original DD Form 214 cannot be properly corrected by issuance of a DD Form 215...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003298

    Original file (20150003298.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered active duty on 30 May 1975 instead of 11 April 1978 and completed 2 years and 7 months of foreign service vice 2 months and 7 days. Although his DD Form 214 is not available for review, he was issued a Certification of Military Service that captured his military service during this period of enlistment. Prior to 1 October 1979, the Army issued a separate DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101027C070208

    Original file (2004101027C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Effective 1 October 1979, the need to prepare a DD Form 214 for enlisted members who are discharged for immediate reenlistment was ended. As a result, the Board recommends all Department of the Army Records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 12d of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 31 January 1996 to show he had 3 years, 8 months, and 12 days of prior...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001110

    Original file (20130001110.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain a DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), separation packet, or his originally-issued DD Form 214 pertaining to his discharge on 2 February 1996. The applicant's reissued DD Form 214 erroneously shows he entered active duty on 21 November 1981 and he was discharged on 2 February 1996 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial with an under honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017971

    Original file (20100017971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered active duty on 16 June 1975 instead of 26 December 1978. The applicant states he entered active duty in June 1975 but the date on his DD Form 214 is 26 December 1978 which is the date he reenlisted. His records do contain a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011525

    Original file (20090011525.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This form shows her last name as "C-------" and her first name as "J--------." This form shows her last name as "C------" and her first name as "J--------." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. issuing the applicant a DD Form 214 that captures her period of ADT from 6 January 2008 through 19 January 2008 with an entry-level status characterization of service; and b. reissuing the applicant an Honorable...