Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009130
Original file (20100009130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009130 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the BSM in Vietnam; however, he departed Vietnam on hardship leave and never received the award.  He goes on to state his team leader (a warrant officer) informed him that he was awarded a BSM but he never got it.  He continues by stating that he now has the time to pursue the award that he earned.  He wants his grandchildren to know what type of Soldier he was.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 December 1955.  He completed his basic training at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas and his advanced individual training as a fuel and electrical system repairer at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Maryland before being transferred to France for a 3 year tour.

3.  He continued to serve through a series of continuous reenlistments and served two tours in Vietnam while in the pay grade of E-6 during the periods of 26 November 1966 to 24 November 1967 and 20 December 1969 to 20 November 1970.

4.  The applicant’s last tour in Vietnam was for a period of 11 months and he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service during the period of December 1969 to December 1970.

5.  He was promoted to the pay grade of E-7 on 29 April 1974.  On 30 June 1976, he was honorably released from active duty, and he was transferred to the Retired List effective 1 July 1976.  He had served 20 years and 7 months of total active service. 

6.  There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM for his service in Vietnam.  Additionally, a search of the United States Army Human Resources Command Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), a web-based index containing roughly 611,000 general orders issued between 1965 and 1973 for the Vietnam era failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged n military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states there is no automatic entitlement to an award upon departure either from an assignment or from the service.  It also states that only one decoration will be awarded to an individual for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service.



9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states that it is the responsibility of any individual having personal knowledge of an act, achievement, or service believed to warrant the award of a decoration to submit a formal recommendation into military command channels for consideration within 2 years of the act, achievement, or service to be honored.  The Army does not condone self-recognition; therefore, a Soldier may not recommend himself/herself for award of a decoration.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he was awarded the BSM in Vietnam has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  This is further supported by the fact that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service during his second tour in Vietnam which would preclude an award of the BSM for meritorious service during the same period as it would be a duplicate award for the same service.

3.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record does not show that he was recommended for and awarded the BSM in Vietnam.  Therefore, in the absence of such evidence there appears to be no basis to add this award to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  __X____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      __________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009130



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009130



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009559

    Original file (20080009559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His separation document shows that he was awarded the PH, but does not show that he was awarded the AGCM, the BSM, or the ARCOM. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the AGCM is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he was awarded the AGCM for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017982

    Original file (20080017982.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The AM orders, certificate, and citation provided by the applicant are sufficiently credible to support a conclusion that the applicant was in fact awarded the AM while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020997

    Original file (20100020997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The two BSM certificates provided by the applicant show he was awarded the BSM (first award) for the period December 1969 to November 1970 on 5 December 1970. The applicant provides two BSM Certificates that show two awards of the BSM; however, they are for the same period of meritorious service and his records only contain orders for one award of the BSM. However, the applicant's records do contain orders awarding him the Air Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022171

    Original file (20100022171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) is void of any orders or documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service. There are no available general orders showing the applicant was awarded the BSM by the appropriate award authority. The applicant's DA Form 20 documents the BSM and ARCOM on the same entry; however, the BSM is lined through.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008189

    Original file (20100008189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Recommendation for decoration, dated 4 December 1970, shows the applicant was recommended for the award of the BSM from 26 March 1970 to 12 December 1970. The orders show the ARCOM (First Oak Leaf Cluster) was awarded for meritorious service during the period March 1970 to December 1970, the same period cited on the applicant's recommendation for the award of the BSM. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these unit awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003391

    Original file (20150003391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 shows in: * item 31 (Foreign Service), he served a tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) beginning on 2 December 1967 * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to – * Company C, 3rd Battalion (Airborne), 187th Infantry from 4 December 1967 to 19 December 1967 * Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Battalion, 187th Infantry, from 20 December 1967 to 26 December 1968 * item 41 (Awards and Decorations) – * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008144

    Original file (20070008144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Air Medal (AM) with "V" Device, and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The certificate showing award of the BSM is insufficient evidence without the respective awards order to correct the applicant’s DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008603

    Original file (20090008603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008603 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record does contain Headquarters, Americal Division, General Orders Number 6922, dated 23 July 1969, which awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service in the RVN from January through July 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004346

    Original file (20110004346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device and all unit awards he is entitled to that were not awarded prior to his release from active duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correction his DD Form 214 to show the BSM (2nd Award) and with "V" Device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...