Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009027
Original file (20100009027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		

		BOARD DATE:	 14 September 2010 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100009027 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal may be awarded for 1 year of service.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of DD Form 214 and Permanent Orders 53-21, dated 13 June 1988.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 27 June 1986, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  He completed his initial training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 76Y (Unit Supply Specialist).  He was subsequently reassigned for duty with the 547th Engineer Battalion, located in the Federal Republic of Germany.

3.  On 30 March 1988, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the provisions of the 1988 Early Transition Program.  He was transferred to the 376th Transportation Corps Company, Fort Rucker, AL.  He had attained the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4, and had completed 1 year. 9 months, and 4 days of creditable active service.

4.  The applicant's records do not contain any record of disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

5.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 list his awards as the Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Army Lapel Button, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

6.  Permanent Orders 53-21, issued by Headquarters, 130th Engineer Brigade, dated 13 June 1988, awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service with the 547th Engineer Battalion during the period
11 November 1986 to 24 June 1988.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal and the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  Permanent orders show that the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service during the time he was assigned to the 547th Engineer Battalion.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his
DD Form 214 to show this award.

3.  The applicant’s records clearly show that he distinguished himself in the performance of his military service as evidenced by his attaining the rank of SP4 and receiving a personal decoration for meritorious service.  Furthermore, there is no evidence of any misconduct or disciplinary action or a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.  It is presumed that his not receiving an Army Good Conduct Medal for his service was an oversight.  Accordingly, he is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ____x___  _x_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period 27 June 1986 through 30 March 1988 and

	b.  adding to item 13 of his DD Form 214 the Army Commendation Medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award).



      __________x______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100009027



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR201000

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016694

    Original file (20090016694.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Five awards of the Army Achievement Medal occurred during the applicant's initial period of active duty service. Three awards of the Army Achievement Medal occurred during the applicant's second period of active duty service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st award) for the period 27 August 1985 to 2 June 1988; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003818

    Original file (20110003818.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. The applicant's military service records do not contain any disciplinary actions, adverse information, or a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 1 February 1984...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024436

    Original file (20100024436.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Despite the obvious error in the beginning date (i.e., the year) and the apparent administrative error regarding the actual period of the award, the evidence of record shows the applicant qualified for and was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). c. Based on the available evidence, it would be appropriate to amend Permanent Order 56-5 to show the correct period and to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015075

    Original file (20130015075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award), the Army Commendation Medal (Second Award), and the Army Achievement Medal (Second Award). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000340

    Original file (20120000340.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 30 March 1992, to show award of the Valorous Unit Award. As a new issue, he requests, in effect, correction to his DD Form 214, for the period ending 30 March 1992, to show all his awards, training, military occupational specialties (MOSs), and various schools. The evidence of record further shows he was awarded MOS...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011206

    Original file (20060011206.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060011206 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (First Oak Leaf...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006195

    Original file (20090006195.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): * Service in Southwest Asia (SWA) from August 1990 to April 1991; * Award of the Army Commendation Medal, the Army Achievement Medal (Third Award), the Army Good Conduct Medal, and Certificates of Achievement; and * Completion of the 62E Construction Equipment Operator Course, the Combat Lifesaver Course, the Emergency Medical Technician Course, and the Airborne Course....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015332

    Original file (20100015332.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his foreign service in Vietnam and the associated medals and decorations (in effect, the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). His records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008441

    Original file (20110008441.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Valorous Unit Award (VUA). His MOS was 63D and his units Unit Identification Code (UIC) was WAEUD0. Unfortunately, there is no available evidence to show the applicant was assigned to a unit that was awarded the VUA during his period of deployment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001988

    Original file (20150001988.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on his completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...