Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008832
Original file (20100008832.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008832 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his rank be changed to sergeant/pay grade E-6.

2.  The applicant states that he held three jobs at one time.  His military occupational specialty was 351.10 (Powerman); his commanding officer put him in charge of the motor pool, a sergeant's position; and he was also the mail clerk.  He believes he earned his sergeant's stripes, but since his records were burned in the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) fire, he has no proof.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's complete military records are not available for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the NPRC in 1973.  His records were seriously damaged in that fire.  The available reconstructed record consists of copies of his DD Form 214, an Honorable Discharge Certificate, a DA Form 1270 (Transfer or Release to a Reserve Component of the Army), reassignment orders from Germany to France, reassignment orders to the United States for release from active duty, transfer orders from the Ready Reserve to the Standby Reserve, several military operator's licenses, and a diploma from the Southeastern Signal School.

3.  The applicant was apparently inducted into the Army of the United States on 30 August 1954.  He served in Europe and was advanced to private first class (PFC) on 19 November 1955.  On 11 August 1956, he was separated early as an overseas returnee with an honorable characterization of service.

4.  None of the available documents identify him as holding a rank higher than PFC.

5.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He believes he earned his sergeant's stripes because he held three jobs at once.  One of them was a sergeant's position.

2.  The applicant's records were damaged in the NPRC fire.  None of the existing documents identify him as holding a rank higher than PFC.

3.  The regulations governing the Board's operation require that records must be presumed to have been maintained in accordance with applicable law and regulations unless the applicant can provide evidence to overcome that presumption.  There is nothing in the available records or in anything submitted by the applicant that does so.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ____X___DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _X   _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008832



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008832

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014827

    Original file (20140014827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to change his rank to corporal (CPL). The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 (Grade-Rate-Rank and Date of Appointment) of his DD Form 214 shows his rank/grade as specialist third class (SP3) and his date of appointment as 16 February 1955.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000790

    Original file (20110000790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) be corrected to show that he was discharged in the rank of sergeant (SGT). While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005277

    Original file (20140005277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was promoted to Technician Fifth Grade (T/5) prior to his separation on 14 October 1946. The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. Still, in the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence confirming appointment or promotion to T/5 there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show this rank.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009316

    Original file (20080009316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 2 (Grade) shows the FSM held the rank of PFC and Item 3 (Date of Rank) shows 20 February 1969. Item 24 of the FSM's DD Form 214, as amended by a DD Form 215 (Correction to the DD Form 214) issued on 25 June 2007, shows the FSM earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: NDSM, BSM with "V" Device and 1st Oak Leaf Cluster, RVNCM, VSM, AM and CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018679

    Original file (20100018679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In two separate applications, the applicant requests his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record of Service-Honorable Discharge) be corrected to reflect his proper unit, military occupational specialty (MOS), and rank. Item 6 (Organization) lists the 75th QM Company as his unit at the time of separation. Further, the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 confirms he was in the QM Corps, and item 31 does not indicate he qualified for the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080982C070215

    Original file (2002080982C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant’s military records were not available to the Board for review. This document lists his rank as PFC in Item 3 (Grade).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021730

    Original file (20120021730.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show: * his rank as sergeant (SGT) vice private first class (PFC) * award of the Bronze Star Medal 2. The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. Unfortunately, there are no orders in his reconstructed record that show he was promoted or appointed to SGT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017502

    Original file (20080017502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080017502 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012417

    Original file (20110012417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Headquarters, 723rd Maintenance Battalion, Unit Orders Number 76, dated 21 October 1968, appointed the applicant to the temporary grade of specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4. There are no orders or any other document that shows he was appointed or promoted to the rank of SGT (E-5).