Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008513
Original file (20100008513.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  17 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008513 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge for his service in Vietnam and it was never put on his DD Form 214.  

3.  The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.




2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 March 1968 for a period of 
3 years.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 63B (wheel vehicle mechanic).  He served in MOS 63B while assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 14th Engineer Battalion in Vietnam from 9 September 1969 through 11 September 1970.  On 11 October 1970, he was released from active duty and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award.  

4.  There are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge in the available records.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) on the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Combat Infantryman Badge. 

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's contentions were carefully considered.  However, there are no orders for the Combat Infantryman Badge.  The evidence of record shows the applicant served as a wheel vehicle mechanic assigned to an engineer battalion during his assignment in Vietnam.  There is no evidence of record which shows he was an infantryman who served in active ground combat while an assigned member of an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size in Vietnam.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence on which to base adding the Combat Infantryman Badge to his DD Form 214.






BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   X____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008513





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR2010

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005597

    Original file (20120005597.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge or Combat Action Badge. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case. However, the Combat Action Badge is authorized for qualifying service from 18 September 2001 to present.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024236

    Original file (20100024236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not show he was ever in the infantry but he has a Combat Infantryman Badge that was issued (to him) when he was assigned to 5th Battalion, 11th Infantry, Fort Carson, CO. The evidence of record shows he served in Vietnam in MOS 63B.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013249

    Original file (20130013249.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. There are no orders in the applicant's record that show he was awarded an infantry MOS. However, his service record does not contain evidence that shows he met all the requirements for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019944

    Original file (20120019944.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows he performed the duties of a vehicle mechanic while assigned to an infantry unit during his tour of duty in Vietnam; however, by regulation, in order to support award of the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009694

    Original file (20130009694.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 30 November 1967 * his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * 42 additional pages from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) * 2 pages of photographs * article from the internet containing the requirements for the Combat Infantryman Badge CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Combat Infantryman...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011874

    Original file (20100011874.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations) provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. The evidence of record shows he completed training and he was awarded MOS 62B. Based on the available evidence, he is not entitled to award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020683

    Original file (20120020683.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His military records are void of any orders or documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB while serving in Vietnam or at any other time during his military service. In addition, the evidence of record fails to show the applicant was awarded the CIB. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 040008208C070208

    Original file (040008208C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show his MOS (military occupational specialty) as 11B (infantry) vice 63B (wheel vehicle mechanic); that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge; and that he be awarded the Air Medal with “V” device. Thus, his request to correct his DD Form 214 to show his MOS as 11B is not granted. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show his MOS as 11B, and award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007850

    Original file (20080007850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for correction of his military service records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The SF 189 shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant requested his “total service record book including medical.” The NA Form 13045 shows that the applicant was informed the medical records he requested were lent to the Veterans Administration and referred the applicant to the VA claim number. The evidence of record shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076227C070215

    Original file (2002076227C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his time in Vietnam and the Combat Infantryman Badge are not shown on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s DD Form 214 with an effective date of 21 November 1967 does not show his inclusive dates of service in Vietnam or the Combat Infantryman Badge as an authorized award. However, evidence of record shows the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which are not correctly shown by award of two bronze service stars for wear on his...