Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100008221
Original file (20100008221.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  21 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100008221 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his unit be changed to Battery B, 2nd Battalion (Airmobile), 320th Artillery, on his 28 December 1970 DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 incorrectly lists Battery A instead of Battery B.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214; memorandum, subject:  Rest and Relaxation (R&R) Allocations for November 1970; and two newspaper articles.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 June 1969.  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 28 November 1969 to 27 December 1970.  He was honorably released from active duty on 28 December 1970.

3.  Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists Battery A, 2nd Battalion (Airmobile), 320th Artillery.

4.  A newspaper article titled "Commendation Medal for [Applicant]" stated that he was awarded a commendation medal for his meritorious achievement in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 28 November 1969 to 31 January 1970.  The article lists the applicant's assignment as Battery B, 2nd Battalion (Airmobile), 320th Artillery.  Another newspaper article titled "Men in Service," dated 20 April 1970, also lists the applicant's unit of assignment as Battery B.

5.  In the memorandum, subject:  R&R Allocations for November 1970, dated 7 October 1970, the applicant's unit is listed as Battery B, 2nd Battalion.

6.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that effective 22 March 1970 the applicant was assigned to Battery A, 2nd Battalion, as a cannoneer.

7.  There are numerous promotion and award orders in the applicant's records that list his unit as either Battery A or B, but there are no assignment orders.

8.  Special Orders Number 345, dated 11 December 1970, show the applicant's unit as Battery A, 2nd Battalion, in the standard name line.  This order reassigned the applicant to the transfer point.  However, his installation clearance form shows the same order number as the authority for his departure, but his organization is listed as Battery B, 2nd Battalion, 320th Artillery.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides guidelines for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states that all available records will be used for the preparation of this form.  The DD Form 214 provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The regulation provides a brief description of each entry made on the form.  In item 12, the preparer is to enter the individual's current unit of assignment and title of the major command or agency having jurisdiction over that organization.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although there are numerous documents in the applicant's records that show his unit of assignment as Battery B, there are no orders to verify this assignment. 
His DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to Battery A in March 1970.  His orders assigning him to the separation transfer point, dated 11 December 1970, listed Battery A as his unit of assignment in the standard name line.  In the absence of orders assigning him to Battery B the presumption of regularity must be applied.  Therefore, his last duty assignment and major command listed on his DD Form 214 appears to be correct.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008221



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100008221



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009887

    Original file (20060009887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his previous application requesting that Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his 27 August 1970 separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) as 13B (Cannon Crewmember) and that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) be corrected to show his entitlement to marksmanship qualification badges based on his qualification...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021773

    Original file (20130021773.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the 2nd Battalion, 320th Artillery in Vietnam was awarded the: * RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 8, dated 1974 * RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018746

    Original file (20140018746.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the following: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he served in Vietnam from "1 November 1969 through 30 June 1971" instead of "2 December 1969 through 9 November 1970" * correction of item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) by removing the entry, "MOS [military occupational specialty] 91B (medical specialist)" * award of: * three bronze service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002793

    Original file (20130002793.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. His unit in Vietnam was cited for award of the RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of assignment which is not shown on his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the following awards to his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012484

    Original file (20090012484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that general orders awarded him the Bronze Star Medal and that he was recommended for award of the Army Commendation Medal. In view of the foregoing, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 August 1969 to 27 March 1971 and correct his military records to show the award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018054

    Original file (20100018054.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 25 February 1969 through 2 October 1970 and to correct his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart (2nd award) for wounds sustained in action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000767

    Original file (20150000767.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains general orders Number 3083 published by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, dated 7 April 1969, awarding him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious achievement from 1 October 1968 to 28 February 1969 for his service in Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013149

    Original file (20100013149.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 18 September 1971 to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), two Overseas Service Bars, National Defense Service Medal, and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001851

    Original file (20090001851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant's last unit of assignment prior to transfer for separation was Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 2nd Howitzer Battalion, 320th Field Artillery Regiment, USARV. Furthermore, there is no evidence of record, other than the entry on his DD Form 214, showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026404

    Original file (20100026404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states a bronze service star is worn on the appropriate service ribbon for each credited campaign, to include the Vietnam Service Medal. Since the governing regulation states only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, and the Silver Star is properly shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 9 September 1969, there is no basis for granting his request to show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device (2nd Oak Leaf Cluster) on his...