Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007071
Original file (20100007071.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 September 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100007071 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, extension of his Mandatory Removal Date (MRD) from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was told his area of concentration (AOC) 61U (Pathologist) was 900 percent (%) over-strength and doesn't understand why this was not told to him prior to his accession.  He performs nearly 300 autopsies each year for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, provides expert testimony in the U.S. Air Force (USAF) drug testing program, and works as a consultant for the Department of Justice in the Criminal Investigative Training and Assistance Program.  He is board certified by the American Board of Pathology in Anatomic Pathology, Clinical Pathology, Forensic Pathology, and Blood Banking and Transfusion Medicine.  He believes he still can make a contribution to the USAR.

3.  The applicant provides the following:

* A copy of a letter from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, dated 9 March 2006
* A copy of his Reserve acceptance memorandum, dated 28 March 2006
* A copy of his Reserve Commissioned Officer appointment memorandum, dated 3 October 2006
* A copy of Active Duty for Training (ADT) Orders T-06-743192, dated
29 June 2007


* A copy of a USAR mobilization memorandum, dated 18 December 2007
* A Curriculum Vitae (CV), dated 1 December 2009
* A copy of a newspaper article depicting his appointment in the USAR

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show he was born on 2 September 1942.  He originally enlisted in the USAR on 5 January 1966.  On 5 May 1966, he enlisted in the Regular Army and he served on active duty through 4 January 1970.  Upon his released from active duty, he was transferred to the USAR.   He attended medical school and he was awarded a Doctor of Medicine Degree from Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, on 23 May 1976.

2.  After a break in service, he received a commission in the U.S. Navy (USN) and he entered active duty on 1 July 1977.  A copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows he served as a Pathologist and he completed 6 years and 1 day of net active service; 3 years,
9 months, and 6 days of prior active service; and 2 years, 3 months, and 1 day of prior inactive service.  He resigned on 1 July 1983 with a characterization of service as honorable.

3.  He received his board certificates in Pathology and in Forensic Pathology from the American Board of Pathology in 1981 and 1988, respectively.

4. On 14 October 2005, the applicant completed a DA Form 61 (Application for Appointment) requesting direct appointment as a commissioned officer in the USAR/Medical Corps.  A copy of a DA Form 5074-R (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit Health Services Officers) indicates the applicant was granted 
23 years of constructive service credit from his Doctor of Medicine Degree and his Board Certifications in Pathology and Forensic Pathology.  On 3 October 2006, he took his oath of office and he was appointed as a Colonel in the USAR.  He was awarded AOC 61U and he was given a date of rank of 3 October 2006.

5.  During the processing of this case, on 17 March 2010, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Director, Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Directorate, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO.  The advisory official opined that the applicant was granted an MRD extension which established a new date of 30 September 2009.

6.  A printout from the Soldier Management System (SMS) transaction log indicates on 30 July 2009, the applicant was advised that no further retention 


was allowed because he was age 67 and AOC 61U was currently filled at 900%.  However, the applicant volunteered for mobilization. 

7.  The advisory official also noted the applicant was informed by his career manager on 5 and 6 January 2010 that he had gone beyond his current MRD and he should not conduct any additional military training.  It was also noted that the applicant and his command could request an MRD extension up to age 68 or to 2 September 2010 as authorized by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14703(b).

8.  On 31 March 2010, a copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal on 31 March 2010.  The applicant did not respond.

9.  His ARPC Form 249-E (Chronological Statement of Retirement Points), dated 26 February 2010, shows that as of 2 October 2009 he was credited with
10 years and 2 days of qualifying service for retirement.  He is projected to complete 20 qualifying years of service on 2 October 2019.  He reached age 68 on 2 September 2010.

10.  Orders 10-144-00003, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, dated 24 May 2010, honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR, effective 20 June 2010.

11.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14703, in pertinent part, is the authority to retain chaplains and officers in medical specialties until a specified age.  It states that the Secretary of the Army may, with the officerÂ’s consent, retain in an active status any reserve officer assigned to the Medical Corps.  An officer may not be retained in an active status under this section later than the date on which the officer becomes 68 years of age.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for extension of his MRD was carefully considered; however, is not supported by the evidence provided. 

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant reached age 68 on 2 September 2010.  He was credited with 10 years and 2 days of qualifying service for retirement as of 2 October 2009 and as a result, would not have 20 qualifying years for retirement until 2 October 2019.

3.  It is also acknowledged that the applicant's AOC was filled at 900% as of
30 July 2009 and he was previously granted an extension which changed his MRD to 30 September 2009.  Nevertheless, he continued to serve in a USAR status until he was discharged on 20 June 2010.

4.  The applicant's desire to continue to serve in the USAR is commendable; however, based upon the current end-strength of AOC 61U there does not appear to be an operational need.  The applicable laws and regulatory guidance also state an officer may not be retained in an active status later than the date on which the officer becomes 68 years of age.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis to granting the applicant's the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      __________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100007071



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                        

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019828

    Original file (20090019828.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In May 2001, the applicant was granted a two-year extension based on the needs of the service, which adjusted her MRD to 31 May 2003. Unfortunately, she is now age 69 and has been without a military status for 7 years and by law is now well past the maximum retention age. Regrettably, the applicant is not entitled to be extended past her MRD of 16 June 2003 or retention in the USAR in order to qualify for retired pay and benefits.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019981

    Original file (20100019981.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 December 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100019981 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his mandatory removal date (MRD) be extended from 31 August 2018 to 31 December 2018. The applicable law states an AMEDD officer may not be retained in an active status later than the last day of the month on which the officer becomes 68 years of age.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012355

    Original file (20130012355.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she completed 33 years and 6 months of service * service credit of 3 years that she completed but was not credited with * correction of her mandatory removal date to show 4 April 2015 * reinstatement and selection to attend the War College 2. However, she completed 3 more years with the USAR after that. The applicant contends: * her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000208

    Original file (20090000208.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, to have the packet he submitted for promotion be considered by the Reserve Position Vacancy Board (PVB) in March 2009 and to extend his mandatory retirement date. The applicant's record is void of any documentation to show that the Secretary of the Army (SA) determined the applicant to be the only qualified officer available to the fill a position vacancy within his unit. Army Regulation 135-155 further states that officers failed of selection by a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022266

    Original file (20110022266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * Extension of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to 30 September 2011 * Service credit and recalculation of retired pay to include all service completed between his current MRD of 7 May 2010 through the adjusted MRD * Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to include the creditable service as well as award of the Meritorious Service Medal 2. The applicant states: * His MRD was 7 May 2010 prior to changing his status from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 03098522C070212

    Original file (03098522C070212.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 1415 states that a Reserve officer who is in an active status and who reaches age 60 will be transferred to the Retired Reserve if qualified and requests such transfer, or be discharged from the Army Reserve. Army Regulation 135-155 provides the policy for selecting and promoting commissioned officers of the Army Reserve and states in effect that a report of a selection board exists after the promotion board issues a signed board report. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000933

    Original file (20090000933.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) shows his MRD as 2002, but his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit showed his MRD as 24 January 2009. He also submits his DA Form 2B (Personnel Qualification Record) which shows his MRD as 24 January 2009. Based on the fact that the applicant's unit was mobilized shortly after his unit administrator's discussion with HRC-STL about his MRD, it may be reasonably concluded that the applicant did in fact submit his request for a waiver...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012378

    Original file (20140012378.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 3 October 2011, the National Guard Bureau granted the Virginia Adjutant General's request for the applicant's retention beyond her MRD of 31 January 2012 (28 years service) until 31 July 2014 (age 60), under the provisions of Title 10, United States Code (USC) section 14703 and National Guard Regulation 635-100 (Personnel Separations - Termination of Appointment and Withdrawal of Federal Recognition). Title 10 USC, section 14515 (Discharge or Retirement for Age), states that each Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001547

    Original file (20090001547.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests, in effect, that documents related to the applicantÂ’s discharge be expunged from the record and that she be reinstated in the USAR. The applicant requested an extension of service to cover time actually served. The documents submitted with this application consist of: a. a Human Resources Command (HRC) memorandum, dated 7 May 2007, which approved the applicant for retention until 31 December 2006 to cover time served and announced discharge, effective 30 April 2007; b. a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004162C080407

    Original file (20070004162C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he receive credit for United States Army Reserve (USAR) service he performed after he reached age 60; and that his retirement pay be changed accordingly. This HRC retirement official further states that AMEDD officer MRD extension procedures are well known; however, it appears the applicant submitted his request to his chain of command in August 2005, which was just three months prior to his MRD and retirement date, and his request was processed...