Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000995
Original file (20100000995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  27 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000995 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of her request that the record of her husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he earned the Silver Star (SS).

2.  The applicant states in addition to her original argument:

   a.  a view of the FSM’s battle jacket will reveal the awards he was obviously presented and earned;

   b.  during the FSM’s military service thousands of records were prepared using manual typewriters which were not always complete;

   c.  the FSM was awarded the SS independent of the events shown on General Orders Number 11, dated 11 January 1945, announcing his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM);

   d.  while being transferred to a safer hospital in a convoy of ambulances and having been pinned down by incoming gunfire, the FSM and a captain crawled out of their ambulance with a revolver and carbine, fired their weapons on the snipers, and secured the area; and

   e.  later in the hospital the captain gave the FSM a letter or certificate recommending him for the award of the SS because there were no medals at the hospital at that time.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents:

* a self-authored statement
* a picture of awards on a uniform jacket
* a copy of General Order Number 11, dated 11 January 1945

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2090010924 on 9 December 2009.

2.  The applicant provides a copy of a photograph of awards and decorations on a uniform jacket, including the Silver Star, which was not previously reviewed by the ABCMR.  Therefore, it is considered new evidence and as such warrants consideration by the Board.

3.  During its original review of the case, the Board determined the FSM’s existing file was void of any corroborating evidence that he was ever recommended for or awarded the SS by the appropriate authority while he served on active duty and denied the applicant’s request for this medal.

4.  The FSM's complete military record is not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973.  It is believed that the FSM’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents on file for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  This case is being considered using a reconstructed record that consists primarily of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55.

5.  The FSM’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he entered active duty on 23 October 1942 and he continuously served until he was honorably discharged from the Army on 7 November 1945, having completed 2 years, 10 months, and 22 days of creditable military service.  The SS is not included among the awards listed on this document.

6.  The FSM’s reconstructed record remains void of any orders or any other documents to show was awarded or recommended for award of the SS.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 3-10 of the awards regulation contains guidance on award of the SS and states, in pertinent part, that it is awarded for gallantry in action of a lesser degree than required for the Distinguished Service Cross.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant contends the FSM was recommended for or awarded the SS.  However, there are no orders or other corroborating evidence in the FSM’s available record or provided by the applicant/FSM to show he (FSM) was ever recommended for or awarded the SS by proper authority during his military service.  Although the SS is affixed on the uniform in the photograph she now provides, regrettably, there is still an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x____  ____x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20090010924 dated 9 December 2009.



      ____________x___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000995



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000995



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010924

    Original file (20090010924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she hopes there is a record of the FSM being awarded the SS because he did earn it and receive it. Given hospital commanders had the authority to award the PH for wounds received in action, this also could possibly be the award the applicant believes the FSM was awarded and for which he received a certificate while in the hospital. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015655

    Original file (20100015655.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests the FSM's record be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. The applicant provides the following documentary evidence on behalf of her deceased father: a. FSM's death certificate; b. WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) for the period ending 29 December 1945; c. WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record); d. FSM's honorable discharge certificate; e. Western...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010461

    Original file (20100010461.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A review of hospital admission data in the SGO files did not reveal any records indicating the FSM received a shrapnel wound to his knee or that he was otherwise wounded as a result of enemy action. The newspaper clipping shows the FSM was entitled to wear the insignia for the Meritorious Service Unit Plaque (later renamed the Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC)) and was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, Purple Heart, Combat Infantryman Badge, and five battle stars. The applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010203C070208

    Original file (20040010203C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, as the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his late father’s records to show award of the Purple Heart. The FSM's military records were not available to the Board for review. Therefore, the Board requests that CMSD- St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with one silver service star and one bronze service star, the Distinguished Unit Citation, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001447

    Original file (20080001447.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A review of all the documents remaining in the FSM's reconstructed NPRC file and of his separation document fail to provide any evidence indicating that he was ever recommended for or awarded the SS by proper authority, or that he was ever promoted to or held a higher rank during his active duty tenure.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012076

    Original file (20080012076.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests in effect, that the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) for valor, the Silver Star (SS), Purple Heart (PH) with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), and Glider Infantry Badge; to show his eligibility for the French Fourragere, Belgian Fourragere, Netherlands Order of William, Belgium Order of the Day, and Netherlands Orange Lanyard; and that he be issued award certificates for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013877

    Original file (20140013877.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the discharge (i.e., WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge)) of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show that he was awarded a Purple Heart (PH), a higher rank, and an "Expert Badge with 3 Bars." The FSM was promoted to a higher rank than his records show, that he received a PH for a wound while in World War II, and he was awarded an Expert Badge with 3 Bars. There is insufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022312

    Original file (20100022312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Service) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal. The applicant's contention that her deceased father's WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to warrant relief. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013059

    Original file (20090013059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 5 of the awards regulation contains guidance on service medals and service ribbons. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 32 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to reflect all eight campaigns identified and to correct item 33 by adding the DUC 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), Army Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, and 1 silver service star, 3 bronze service stars and 1 bronze arrowhead with his EAME Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005932C070205

    Original file (20060005932C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, as the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests that her late father’s WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart. The FSM’s military records are not available to the Board for review. The medical evidence of record which shows the FSM sustained a battle injury on 6 December 1944 in the European Theater of Operations is accepted as sufficient evidence on which to amend his WD AGO Form 53-55...