Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000695
Original file (20100000695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 August 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000695 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states:

* his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 11B4O
* he was in the 9th Aviation Battalion, 9th Infantry Division, as a helicopter door gunner
* he was active in military evacuations and he was on the receiving end exchanging gunfire with his crews in the air and on the ground

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a map of Vietnam.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 15 July 1966, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed training as a clerk typist.  He arrived in Vietnam on 17 September 1967 and he was assigned to Company B, 9th Aviation Battalion, 9th Infantry Division, as a clerk typist.

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was transferred to Company A, 9th Aviation Battalion, 9th Infantry Division, and was awarded MOS 11B4O on 1 June 1968.

4.  On 13 September 1968, the applicant departed Vietnam en route to the continental United States.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 14 July 1969 and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.

6.  The DD Form 214 he was furnished shows the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal
* Air Medal (12th Oak Leaf Cluster)
* Army Commendation Medal

7.  A review of the available records does not show the applicant was engaged in active ground combat while he was in Vietnam.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  His records do show he was assigned to the 9th Aviation Battalion within the 9th Infantry Division.  However, there is no evidence in the available records that shows he engaged in active ground combat with an infantry unit of brigade or smaller size when he was in Vietnam.  Therefore, he does not meet the criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  In view of the foregoing there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000695



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106650C070208

    Original file (2004106650C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Purple Heart. However, there are no orders in the applicant’s service personnel records which show that he was awarded the Purple Heart, and there is no evidence in his records that he was wounded or treated for wounds as a result of hostile action. In the absence of military records, which show the applicant was wounded or injured or treated for wounds as a result of hostile...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006901

    Original file (20060006901.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he should be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class, Unit Citation, and his other awards are for service while attached to the 9th Infantry Division but no written orders were issued. There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge while he served in Vietnam. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012168

    Original file (20120012168.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he was a combat infantryman the whole time he was in Vietnam assigned to Company C, 2d Battalion, 60th Infantry, 9th Infantry Division. However, there is no evidence to show he engaged in active ground combat.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014005

    Original file (20090014005.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the CIB. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. During the Vietnam era, the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003099

    Original file (20150003099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: a. The available record shows that he was performing duties as a clerk typist during most of his service in Vietnam. He was awarded a clerk typist MOS on 27 September 1967.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028052

    Original file (20100028052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he spent 4 months with A Company, 2nd Battalion, 503rd Infantry. He was awarded MOS 71B and his MOS of 11B was withdrawn 4 months before he was sent to the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, in view of the above, there is insufficient evidence to award the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016888

    Original file (20080016888.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s military personnel records did not contain any orders for awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Therefore, the evidence of record fails to support the applicant’s claim to the Combat Infantryman Badge in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015365

    Original file (20080015365.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to reflect that he served as a combat infantryman in Vietnam and that he be awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states, in effect, that during his first 4 months in Vietnam he was assigned to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 173rd Airborne Brigade. The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (formerly known as the Total Army Personnel Command) has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019916

    Original file (20100019916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicant states he served in Vietnam as an infantryman and was never awarded the CIB. Absent this evidence, there is insufficient evidence upon which to award the CIB in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020197

    Original file (20110020197.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, the evidence of record shows he held an administrative MOS and served with his infantry battalion as a clerk typist. There is no evidence in the available records and he did not submit evidence that shows he held an infantry MOS or that he was personally present and under hostile fire while serving in his assigned infantry duty, in an infantry unit that was actively engaged in ground combat with the enemy. Regretfully, in the absence of conclusive evidence that the applicant held...