Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000505
Original file (20100000505.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000505 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal.  

2.  The applicant states that he would like the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal listed on his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provided no additional documentation in support of his application.

COUNSEL'S REQUEST, STATEMENT AND EVIDENCE:

1.  Counsel requests that the applicant's DD Form 214 be annotated to show a Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal.

2.  Counsel states that the applicant wants his DD form 214 corrected to add a Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal as awards for his service in the Republic of Vietnam. 

3.  Counsel provides no additional documentation in support of the applicant's request.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 1 August 1968, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States for 2 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty 94B (Cook).

3.  On or about 6 December 1968, the applicant departed Fort Jackson, South Carolina, for duty in the Republic of Vietnam.

4.  On 19 January 1969, the applicant was assigned for duty as a rifleman with 
D Company, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, in the Republic of Vietnam.

5.  General Orders Number 103, 71st Evacuation Hospital, undated, awarded the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 14 April 1969. 

6.  On or about 3 May 1969, the applicant was medically evacuated to the Medical Holding Company, US Army Hospital, Fort Jackson, South Carolina.

7.  On 1 August 1969, the applicant was assigned for duty as a cook's apprentice with the 10th Battalion, 2nd Basic Combat Training Brigade, at Fort Jackson.

8.  On 31 July 1970, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He had attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4, and had completed 
2 years of creditable active duty service.

9.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, [Republic of] Vietnam Campaign Medal with 1960 Device, Good Conduct Medal, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle [M-16] Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle [M-14] Bar.

10.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in:

	a.  in Item 40 (Wounds): gunshot wound, right leg, 14 April 1969; and

	b.  in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) Purple Heart and the same awards already shown on his DD Form 214.

11.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that based on the applicant's dates of service in the Republic of Vietnam, he participated in the following two campaign periods: the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase VI; and the Tet 69 Counteroffensive.  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

12.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  This publication shows that the 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was cited in general orders for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.

13.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal.

14.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years.

15.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted 


in a timely fashion.  Upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award of or upgrading of a decoration.  Based upon such review, the Secretary shall determine the merits of approving the award.

16.  The request, with a DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), must be submitted through a Member of Congress to:  U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Soldier Programs and Services Division, 200 Stovall Street, Room 3S67, Alexandria, VA  22332-0405.  The unit must be clearly identified, along with the period of assignment and the recommended award.  A narrative of the actions or period for which recognition is being requested must accompany the DA Form 638.  Requests should be supported by sworn affidavits, eyewitness statements, certificates, and related documents.  Supporting evidence is best provided by commanders, leaders, and fellow Soldiers who had personal knowledge of the facts relative to the request.  The burden and costs for researching and assembling supporting documentation rest with the applicant.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart and the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  General orders show that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

3.  Records show that the applicant participated in two campaign periods during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is eligible for award of two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

4.  The applicant's unit was cited in general orders for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.  Therefore, his records should be corrected to show these foreign unit awards.

5.  While the available evidence is insufficient to correct the applicant's records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects his right to pursue his claim for this award by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that, in addition to the awards shown on his DD Form 214, his authorized awards include the Purple Heart, two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Bronze Star Medal.  




      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000505





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000505



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013008

    Original file (20090013008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the Army Commendation Medal. The records show that during his active service from 30 October 1970 to 1 October 1974 he was awarded or was authorized the Bronze Star Medal and a third award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 with an effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011150

    Original file (20060011150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 17 April 1967 to 14 February 1969; b. awarding him the Combat...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001418

    Original file (20140001418.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain General Orders (GO) Number 28, issued by Headquarters, 54th Field Artillery Group, on 15 June 1969, awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in Vietnam on 18 May 1969. GO awarded him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 18 May 1969, and he states he was awarded the Purple Heart for his June 1969 wounds. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023151

    Original file (20100023151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His service record does not contain any orders or other evidence showing he was awarded a second Purple Heart. The evidence of record shows he was wounded on 5 March 1969 and was awarded the Purple Heart for this wound. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from item 24 of his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 24 April 1968...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019078

    Original file (20100019078.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 10 June 1969. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Combat Infantryman Badge for satisfactory performance of duty against an active hostile ground force in the RVN while assigned to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019560

    Original file (20080019560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the award of the Bronze Star Medal or the Purple Heart. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000955C070205

    Original file (20060000955C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214, does not show award of the Purple Heart or the CMB. The evidence also shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected as follows: a. by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained on 28...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015488

    Original file (20080015488.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze stars from the individual's DD Form 214 issued on 4 March 1971; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 5 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005094

    Original file (20140005094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there are no orders or any other evidence in his military records that show he was recommended for or awarded the Silver Star. There is no evidence in his military records that shows he was awarded the Silver Star for action on 12 August 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars from his DD Form 214; b. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015497C070206

    Original file (20050015497C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    24 October 1950 through 23 October 1953 – with 1 year and 2 days of foreign service and award of the Purple Heart, the Good Conduct Medal, the Korean Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the United Nations Service Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge; c. no DD Form 214 is of record for the period 7 December 1953 through 3 October 1956; d. 4 October 1956 through 3 October 1962 – with 1 year, 6 months, and 5 days of foreign service and award of the Purple Heart, the Good...