Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000224
Original file (20100000224.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  1 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000224 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the non-pay period of time lost from 10 February to 4 July 1968 be deemed good time. 

2.  The applicant states that on 12 December 1967 he was a passenger in a car involved in a head on collision in Arkansas and was hospitalized until he returned to active duty on 4 July 1968.

3.  The applicant provides three newspaper articles, a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and two third-party letters in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s official records were not available for review.  However, the applicant has provided sufficient documents to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 July 1967 and it appears he went absent without leave (AWOL) while in basic training.  He successfully completed his training as a crawler tractor operator. 

4.  On 1 July 1970, he was discharged under honorable conditions at the United States Army Correctional Training Facility at Fort Riley, Kansas due to unfitness.  He had completed 1 year, 2 months and 18 days of total active service and he had at least 169 days of lost time due to being AWOL.

5.  The period 10 February to 4 July 1968 was deemed as time lost.  There is no evidence available to support the applicant was on an authorized absence at the time he was involved in the car accident or if it was determined to be in the line of duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to show the period 10 February to 4 July 1968 was deemed to be an authorized absence by the commander, it must be presumed the applicant was properly charged as being AWOL during the period in question.

2.  The fact that the applicant was discharged from the Army Correctional Training Facility is indicative that the applicant may have been convicted by a court-martial.  Therefore, in the absence of the details concerning the period in question it would not be prudent to designate the period in question as good time.

3.  Accordingly, there does not appear to be sufficient evidence to support the applicant's contention that the period in question should be deemed good time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ____x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000224



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000224


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011553

    Original file (20100011553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). There is no evidence and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows he did not stutter or stammer, or that he did not complete or request the items listed on the DD Form 504 dated 10 October 1969. ____________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022659

    Original file (20110022659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following documents: * a letter from the Incarcerated Veterans' Consortium, Inc. * power of attorney * a Standard Form 502 (Clinical Record – Narrative Summary) * police reports * a letter * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * a page from the Summary of Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) Hearing * civilian medical records * several character-reference letters CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The same letter shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008354

    Original file (20140008354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His service record shows he was absent without leave (AWOL) from 2 April 1968 to 30 October 1969. b. Paragraph 3-7b states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. He was also AWOL from 3 to 7 March 1970.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005994

    Original file (20090005994.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be changed to a medical discharge. Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), chapter 7, physical profiling, provides that the basic purpose of the physical profile serial system is to provide an index to the overall functional capacity of an individual and is used to assist the unit commander and personnel officer in their determination of what duty assignments the individual is capable...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002023C070205

    Original file (20060002023C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 26 March 1968, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-212 for unfitness due to his frequent involvement in incidents of a discreditable nature with military authorities. On 25 January 1976, he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge. The U.S. Court of Appeals, observing that applicants to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) are by statute allowed 15 years to apply...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011656C070208

    Original file (20040011656C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His status was changed from AWOL to confinement by civil authorities on 1 August 1969. The applicant was 20 years old at the time of his conviction. The evidence available to the Board indicates the applicant was discharged as a result of his civil conviction.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009514

    Original file (20080009514.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012322

    Original file (20060012322.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 May 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012322 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's last period of unauthorized absence was not excused even though he was allowed to separate with a Hardship Discharge. Yolanda Maldonado ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008841

    Original file (20140008841.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), as amended by two DA Forms 2876 (Report of Change for DA Form 20), shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service), he served in Vietnam from 3 April...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007548

    Original file (20120007548.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. On 12 July 1973, his commander recommended approval of his request for discharge and that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 14 August 1973, he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) for the good of the service with an undesirable discharge.