Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000178
Original file (20100000178.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  22 June 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000178 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to include "101st Airborne Division."  He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Presidential Unit Citation.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 May 1970 and he completed training as a field artillery crewman.  He served in Vietnam from 16 November 1970 to 14 November 1971 and he was assigned to A Battery and then to B Battery, 1st Battalion, 39th Artillery, 101st Airborne Division (Airmobile).

3.  The applicant was reassigned to the Transfer Center or Transfer Point on 15 November 1971, for separation processing in Special Orders Number 283, published by the Department of the Army, Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 39th Artillery, 101st Airborne Division "(Ambl)," APO San Francisco 96383, dated 8 November 1971.

4.  On 15 November 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee.

5.  Item 12 on his DD Form 214 shows B Battery, 1st Battalion, 39th Artillery, APO 96383, as his last duty assignment and major command.

6.  His DD Form 214 also shows the following awards:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Two Overseas Service Bars
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-16)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar

7.  A review of the available records and Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citations and Campaign Participation Credit Register) does not show the unit to which the applicant was assigned was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) serves as the authority for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, that for personnel reassigned on orders to a transfer activity or to a medical holding detachment prior to separation, enter the losing unit of assignment as shown in the standard name line and the title of the major command or agency having jurisdiction over the losing unit of assignment as shown in the lead line "Maj Comd/Agcy" of the orders reassigning the individual to the transfer activity or the medical holding detachment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was assigned to the 101st Airborne Division (Ambl) and it is reasonable to add this information to item 12 on his DD Form 214.
2.  However, there is no evidence in the available records, nor has the applicant submitted any evidence, to support his contention that the unit to which he was assigned was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation.

3.  Therefore, it would not be appropriate to add the Presidential Unit Citation to his DD Form 214 until such time as he can provide evidence to support his contention.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding in item 12 of his DD Form 214 the entry "101st Airborne Division (Ambl)."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending his DD Form 214 to show the Presidential Unit Citation.



      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000178



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000178



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017196

    Original file (20140017196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's military service records for the period of service under review are not available to the Board for review. However, the DD Form 214 and award orders provided by the applicant offer sufficient evidence for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's DD Form 214 to show his correct unit of assignment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003642

    Original file (20120003642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal with Oak Leaf Clusters, a Republic of Vietnam unit citation, the Parachutist Badge, and correction of his last unit duty assignment. Orders for a third Army Commendation Medal were not filed in his records or provide by him. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018294

    Original file (20140018294.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of item 12 (Last Unit of Assignment and Major Command) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was assigned to Company A instead of Company C, 101st Aviation Battalion. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140018294 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017028

    Original file (20070017028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence the applicant was assigned to a unit of the 1st Cavalry Division and that he is entitled to additional unit awards, to include the Presidential Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the individual the Good Conduct Medal, for the period 26 April 1971 to 25 April 1973; the Vietnam Service Medal, with three bronze service stars; and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021007

    Original file (20100021007.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he has three orders for the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 9 June 1969, 11 July 1969, and 11 July 1969 * on 9 June 1969 he was hit with shrapnel * on 11 July 1969 he was shot in the left shoulder by an AK-47 rifle during a firefight and 4 hours later he was hit in the left ear with shrapnel from a rocket-propelled grenade * he informed the doctor of the two separate incidents and the doctor treated his ear and shoulder * he was sent to Japan * the two...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008934

    Original file (20090008934.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This document shows that while the applicant was assigned to both regiments in Vietnam they were both cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation in accordance with Department of the Army, General Order 6, 1974. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058705C070421

    Original file (2001058705C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). He contends that he was awarded the ARCOM and CIB for service to the United States and it would only be just to show this correction in his military records. Therefore, the Board is sufficiently convinced that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious achievement during his assignment with the 11 th Artillery and is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003884

    Original file (20120003884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his military service. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002656

    Original file (20120002656.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 should be corrected to show this award. Although he is authorized to wear only one award, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 should be corrected to show two awards of this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 for the period ending 6 April 1991 the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004164C071029

    Original file (20070004164C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 4 July 1971 be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with device 1960; the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Valorous Unit Award; the Presidential Unit Citation, and the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of this...