Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000095
Original file (20100000095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    29 June 2010  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000095 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Air Medal.

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the Air Medal on 20 October 1969.  He states it was not put on his DD Form 214 at the time of his discharge.  He further states the Department of Veterans Affairs pointed out the omission while he was filing a claim for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of an Air Medal certificate and a copy of the 101st Airborne Division citation for the award.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 November 1967 for a period of 3 years.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 67N (Single Rotor Turbine Helicopter Mechanic).  He reenlisted on         31 August 1968 for an additional 3 years.

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 
7 November 1968 through 6 November 1969.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC), 160th Aviation Group and later assigned to Battery A, 44th Battalion, 77th Artillery, 101st Airborne Division.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960), 2 overseas service bars, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar for both the M-14 and M-16 rifles.

5.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Air Medal pertaining to the applicant.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Air Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly; for example, personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

7.  U.S Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal for sustained operations.  Appendix IV of the regulation required that recommendations for award of the Air Medal for crewmembers or non-crewmembers on flying status would be submitted on USARV Form 157-R.  The recommendation for award must also have stated that the individual “met the required number of missions and hours for award of the Air Medal”; that “the individual has not caused, either directly or indirectly, an aircraft abort, late take-off, accident or incident”; and that the 

“individual’s accomplishments and service throughout the period have reflected meritorious performance, with no instance of non-professionalism, mediocrity, or failure to display an aggressive spirit.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's request to have the Air Medal added to his DD Form 214 was carefully considered; however, there is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided any evidence which shows he was awarded the Air Medal by official orders.  Absent such evidence, there is no basis to grant the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000095



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000095

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001367

    Original file (20110001367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Records show the applicant participated in three campaign phases during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000933C071029

    Original file (20070000933C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was a crew chief on flight status from 15 July 1972 through 24 January 1974, the date of his separation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying honorable active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017852

    Original file (20110017852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    CIB orders are on file in the applicant's record and therefore the CIB should be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant's record is void of AM orders or other documentation indicating it was ever recommended or awarded; however, by regulation, eligibility for the AM is established for members whose combat duties require them to fly, which includes those in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy and those directly involved in airborne command and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011829

    Original file (20080011829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his record be corrected to show the award of the Air Medal. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to award the Air Medal. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005845

    Original file (20090005845.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that the Purple Heart (PH), Air Medal (AM), Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and all other awards to which he is entitled be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). There is no evidence that the applicant was awarded the AM; therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013714

    Original file (20140013714 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show 15 additional awards of the AM (i.e., the AM with Numeral 16) because he accrued 763 hours of combat assault or combat support flight time. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded more than one AM. e. However, based on the evidence of record (i.e., certification by the operations officer that the applicant accrued 453 flight hours) and the conclusion they were category III...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008511

    Original file (20080008511.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s records do not contain general orders awarding him the Air Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Air Medal with Numeral 8 for participating in aerial flight in the Republic of Vietnam from January 1971 to December 1971; and b. showing award of the Air Medal (Numeral 8), the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005189

    Original file (20090005189.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that he located the orders that awarded him the Bronze Star Medal and his flight record that shows he completed 240 hours of combat flying time by 30 June 1969 which should qualify him for additional oak leaf clusters for his Air Medal. Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, General Orders Number 12870, dated 9 October 1969, show the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from 1 December 1968 to 31 July 1969 in the Republic of Vietnam. To...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050014830C070206

    Original file (20050014830C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, he was assigned to the following units: a. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007496

    Original file (20080007496.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. There is no evidence nor did the applicant provide any evidence that shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual’s DD Form 214, dated 24 February 1972, be corrected by: a. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. showing award of the...