Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000016
Original file (20100000016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 July 2010

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20100000016 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his late father's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 1 August 1973 to show his father was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation and one service stripe. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM is eligible to wear the Meritorious Unit Commendation and authorized one service stripe for three years of service.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), prepared on 1 August 1972
* Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 5 dated 5 February 1973
* Headquarters, DAGO Number 11, dated 23 April 1973  
* State of Illinois Certificate of Live Birth, dated 18 November 1983
* State of Indiana Certificate of Death, dated 11 April 2003

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 


or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The FSM enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 September 1970 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 96D (Image Interpreter).

3.  The FSM arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Detachment A, 1st Military Intelligence (MI) Battalion on 30 December 1971.  He was reassigned to the 191st MI Detachment, 3rd Brigade (Separate) on 20 March 1972.  The FSM departed Vietnam on 8 August 1972 after being credited with participating in two campaigns.

4.  Headquarters, DAGO Number 11, dated 23 April 1973 and Headquarters, DAGO Number 5, dated 5 February 1973 both shows that the 1st MI Battalion was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for meritorious achievement for the period 1 March 1970 through 27 April 1972.

5.  On 1 August 1973, the FSM was honorably released from active duty after completing 2 years, 10 months, and 24 days of active service.  

6.  The FSM's DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 August 1973 shows that he was awarded:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal 
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge (M-16)

7.  On 12 February 2007, the FSM's DD Form 214 was amended to add the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

8.  Army Regulation 670-1 (Uniforms and Insignia), in effect at the time, governs the requirements for the wear of service stripes.  It provides, in pertinent part, 

that one service stripe is authorized for wear on the right sleeve of the dress green (class A) uniform for every three years of service completed.  Service stripes are not authorized for entry on the DD Form 214.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Evidence of record shows that at the time the FSM was assigned to the 1st MI Battalion it was awarded of the Meritorious Unit Commendation.  His participation in two campaigns entitles him to two bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be amended to add these awards.

2.  The applicant’s contention that the FSM's service stripe should be entered on his DD Form 214 has been noted.  Service stripes are an item of uniform wear, not an award or decoration, and thus are not authorized for entry on the DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ____X___  ____X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the FSM's DD Form 214 to add the Meritorious Unit Commendation and two bronze service stars to be worn on his Vietnam Service Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 

denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding one service stripe to the FSM's DD Form 214.  



      _______ _  X_______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000016





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100000016



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100892C070208

    Original file (2004100892C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (all periods of service)), of his DD Form 214, shows he was awarded the: "National Defense Service Medal//Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, with 60 Device//Meritorious Unit Citation//Overseas Service Bars (4)//Combat Sp Skill with Dr Bar//Republic of Vietnam Cross Gallantry with Palm//Army Service Ribbon//Service Stripes-5//Good Conduct Medal 4th Award//Overseas Service Ribbon-1//Army Commendation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013122

    Original file (20100013122.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the KDSM is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the Republic of Korea. The FSM was awarded the VSM, and his records show he participated in four campaigns while serving in Vietnam. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the KSM, but does not show he received campaign credit for service in Korea.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020485

    Original file (20090020485.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his deceased father be awarded two Silver Stars and two additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal; however, there are no orders or other evidence in his Official Military Personnel File authorizing these awards. Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that during his service with the Heavy Mortar Company of the 180th Infantry Regiment in Korea, this unit was awarded the Distinguished Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014112

    Original file (20090014112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device and the Purple Heart. Although wear of multiple awards of this unit citation badge is not authorized, official military personnel and historical records will indicate all awards received. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100001016

    Original file (20100001016.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the correct spelling of the FSM's last name. This publication shows during the time of the FSM's assignment, the 11th Armored Cavalry Regiment was cited in Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 43, dated 1972 for award of the Valorous Unit Award; and in DAGO Number 50 and 55, dated 1971...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019560

    Original file (20090019560.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Army Achievement Medal is awarded to any member of the armed forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement. The FSM’s service record does not show he was recommended for or awarded the Army Achievement Medal. However, the FSM’s service record does not contain any orders or other evidence which shows he was recommended for or awarded the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018112

    Original file (20090018112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized (All periods of Service)) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized to wear the * Bronze Star Medal * Defense Meritorious Service Medal * Meritorious Service Medal * Air Medal (7th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Army Service Ribbon * Overseas Service Ribbon * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (7th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016074C070206

    Original file (20050016074C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's service for the period 9 January 1953 through 9 August 1956 is not documented with a DD Form 214. DD Forms 214, with end dates: 9 August 1959, 9 August 1962, 9 August 1965, 9 August 1968, and 24 June 1971 show the applicant earned the following awards: Expert Infantryman Badge; the Good Conduct Medal (4th Award); the National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award), in effect, the National Defense Service Medal, with oak leaf cluster; the Combat Infantryman Badge; the Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008429

    Original file (20130008429.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). GO Number 46, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Transportation Center, Fort Eustis, VA, on 4 February 1972, awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal for service during the period 30 January 1969 through 29 January 1972. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding to his DD Form 214, ending on 5 February 1974: * Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000063

    Original file (20100000063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he is entitled to the following unit awards for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN): Army Presidential Unit Citation, Army Valorous Unit Award, Army Meritorious Unit [Commendation], RVN Presidential Unit Citation, RVN Gallantry Cross Unit Citation, and possibly others. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show...