Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20090003150
Original file (AR20090003150.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       28 MAY 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20090003150 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  The applicant states he was assigned to the 551st Military Police Company in Saigon for 4 months before being transferred to Cat Lai, South Vietnam, for 3 months.  He states his military occupational specialty (MOS) was 11B2O and he believes he should have been awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a letter from the National Personnel Records Center authorizing issuance of awards and decorations associated with his military service.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Records available to the Board indicate the applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 25 July 1969.  He was trained as a light weapons infantryman (11B).

3.  According to documents in his military personnel file, he arrived in Vietnam in December 1969 where he was briefly assigned to a transportation detachment before being reassigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 4th Transportation Command, in February 1970.  In March 1970 orders were issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Support Command, Saigon, promoting the applicant to pay grade E-4 in MOS 95B (military police).  Item 38 (record of assignments) of the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) indicates the applicant performed duties as a security guard while assigned to the 4th Transportation Command.

4.  The applicant departed Vietnam in November 1970 and was assigned to the 551st Military Police Company at Fort Polk, Louisiana, where he remained until he was released from active duty on 23 July 1971.

5.  There is no indication the applicant was ever awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Although the applicant may have held an infantry specialty while in Vietnam, he was not assigned to an infantry unit and as such would not have been eligible for the Combat Infantryman Badge.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

4.  The applicant and all others concerned should know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________XXX____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003150



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20090003150



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064309C070421

    Original file (2001064309C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT REQUESTS:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003256

    Original file (20120003256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Overseas Service Ribbon. He served a qualifying period for award of the Vietnam Service Medal. The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060017648

    Original file (20060017648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the MOS (military occupation specialty), of 11B20, Light Weapons Infantryman, the Combat Infantryman Badge, and the Good Conduct Medal. The evidence of record shows the applicant was trained as a teletypewriter repairman, in MOS, 31J20, and his last duty of assignment was with HHC, 4th Supply and Transport Battalion, 4th Infantry Division, in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065120C070421

    Original file (2001065120C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The applicant’s DA Form 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019082

    Original file (20100019082.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge, Parachutist Badge, and any other awards he may be authorized. Records show that the applicant was in three different units at the time they were awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS when first assigned to infantry regiments in the RVN.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009593

    Original file (20080009593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military service records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and his DA Form 20 does not list the Combat Infantryman Badge in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations). There are also no orders or other evidence to show the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. Thus, the evidence of record fails to show that the applicant served as an infantryman who satisfactorily performed infantry duties, that he was assigned or attached to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018740

    Original file (20140018740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Combat Infantryman Badge and two awards of the Bronze Star Medal. d. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to add the Combat Infantryman Badge to his DD Form 214 or establish his eligibility for this badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007850

    Original file (20080007850.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for correction of his military service records to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The SF 189 shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant requested his “total service record book including medical.” The NA Form 13045 shows that the applicant was informed the medical records he requested were lent to the Veterans Administration and referred the applicant to the VA claim number. The evidence of record shows that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017130

    Original file (20140017130.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his service record shows he had a duty military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B as of 8 November 1966 after completing Infantry advanced individual training (AIT) at Fort Ord, CA. The applicant provides: * a list of units participating in defense of Tan Son Nhut Airbase during the 1968 Tet Offensive * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket AR20130012238, dated 13 March 2014 * an excerpt from Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) CONSIDERATION...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001850

    Original file (20110001850.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's military service records do not contain a DD Form 214 for the period of service from 20 January 1953 through 27 November 1955. The applicant's military personnel record does not contain any orders or other evidence showing he was recommended for or awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge (2nd Award). The evidence of record shows that during the period of service: a.