Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | AR20080017823
Original file (AR20080017823.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        17 MARCH 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080017823 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests cancellation of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the SBP is causing financial hardship for his family. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (Divorce) Without Children, a copy of his Marriage Certificate, and a self - authored letter in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 
8 November 1976.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11C (Indirect Fire Infantryman).  He retired from the Army in the rank of staff sergeant/E-6 on 30 November 1996.

2.  A copy of the applicant's DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 3 September 1996, was obtained from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) located in Cleveland, Ohio.

3.  On 3 September 1996, in preparation for his retirement, the applicant completed a DD Form 2656.  In Block 26g (Beneficiary Category(ies)), he elected “Not to participate in the SBP" by placing an "X" in Item 26g (I Elect Not to 
Participate in the SBP).  He also placed an "X" in the box stating he did not have eligible dependents under the plan.  The applicant authenticated this form by placing his signature in Item 32a (Member Signature) and the date "3 September 1996" in Item 32b (Member Date Signed).  

4.  The applicant married on an unknown date.  He provided a copy of his Decree of Dissolution of Marriage (Divorce) Without Children, dated 24 March 2006.

5.  The applicant provides a copy of his Marriage License that shows he was married to his current spouse on 28 April 2006.  Records at DFAS indicate he enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage after this marriage.  However, DFAS records indicate SBP premiums were not deducted until around July 2008, resulting in back premiums due from the period 1 May 2007 through
30 November 2007 at $84.76 per month and from 1 December 2007 through
31 July 2008 at $86.71 per month.

6.  The applicant also provided a self-authored letter, dated 8 October 2008, which in essence states that he was not aware that enrolling in the SBP would incur a debt nor was he informed that the debt would be taken out without him being notified of the amount that would be deducted from his retired pay.

7.  Public Law 92-425, the SBP, enacted 21 September 1972, provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.

8.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that dependent child.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contentions that his SBP should be cancelled and the deduction of monthly payments from his retirement pay should be discontinued were carefully considered and found to be without merit.

2.  The applicant did not have the SBP upon retirement, but he did enroll within one year after his marriage to his current spouse.  As a result, his SBP became effective 1 May 2007, and his election is irrevocable.



3.  Back premiums began effective 1 May 2007 and continued through 
31 July 2008, thereby providing SBP coverage for his current spouse as requested by the applicant.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.  Regrettably, there is no basis for granting the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________XXX____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017823



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080017823



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050015984C070206

    Original file (20050015984C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    John G. Heck | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. If the member fails to make such an election, the law also permits the former spouse concerned to request that a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009918

    Original file (20100009918.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states she elected not to participate in the SBP; however, SBP premium payments were withdrawn from her first retirement pay statement. She states when she initially completed the form electing to decline SBP coverage, there were no instructions stating that signatures on the form must be notarized. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the applicant accurately completed the DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007495

    Original file (20140007495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his spouse within one year of his remarriage. The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 4 April 2014 * Certificate of marriage (Connie), dated 12 February 2013 * Emails to DFAS * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 7 July 2008 * National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022811

    Original file (20100022811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) provided by DFAS shows the following: * retirement date – 1 October 2004 * spouse – F____ * child – S____ with a date of birth of 23 July 1991 * SBP election – 26b, coverage for spouse and child(ren) * date signed – 7 July 2004 4. DFAS stated in an email to this Board, dated 9 May 2011, the FSM's DD Form 2656 was submitted by Fort Carson on 3 November 2004 and shows he elected spouse and child(ren) coverage. The applicant and the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008231

    Original file (20090008231.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he had no eligible spouse at the time of his retirement and that he submitted a request to enroll his current spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner. The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement in 1991, the applicant made an SBP election to decline all coverage. When the applicant attempted to enroll his new spouse in the SBP during the FY06 Open Season, he was incorrectly informed that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009786

    Original file (20120009786.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a statement from his spouse. In item 32 (Member), the statement reads "Also I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within one year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. c. In Section XII (SBP Spouse Concurrence) (Required when member is married and elects child(ren) only coverage, does not elect full spouse coverage, or declines coverage; the date of the spouse's signature in item...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021899

    Original file (20090021899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 September 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090021899 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant retired on 1 May 1998. He was not married at the time and he elected SBP coverage for child-only coverage.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140012453

    Original file (20140012453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This requires establishment of his current spouse as the only eligible SBP beneficiary of record. Public Law 99-661, dated 18 November 1984, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows prior to his retirement, he completed an SBP election form wherein he elected SBP former spouse...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019404

    Original file (20090019404.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of: * his DD Form 2656, dated 7 June 2009 * his Summary of Retired Pay Account, dated 29 July 2009 * a cover sheet from U.S. Army Human Resources Command CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. c. Item 26g (I Elect Not to Participate in SBP) of section IX (SBP Election) is not checked. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing the DD Form 2656 he and his wife completed on 7 June 2009 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013902

    Original file (20110013902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He submitted the following: * An empty envelope from DFAS, addressed to the applicant and postmarked 21 June 2010 * A DD Form 2894, which shows he designated his current spouse as the sole beneficiary to receive any unpaid retired pay upon his death, on 25 July 2010 * A DD Form 2656-6, which shows he elected to change his SBP election from "child only" to "spouse only," signed and notarized on 1 July 2011 6. Item 8 of his DD Form 2656-6 clearly states "A member, who does not have a spouse...